An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator

被引:1
|
作者
Sohn, James J. [1 ]
Lim, Sara [1 ]
Das, Indra J. [1 ]
Yadav, Poonam [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Northwestern Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging guided radiation; therapy; MRIdian; QA; Magphan; ACR alternatives; MR-LINAC; RADIATION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Periodic imaging quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MRL) is critical. The feasibility of a new MRL imaging phantom used for QA in the low field was evaluated with auto-mated image analysis of various parameters for accuracy and reproducibility. Methods and materials: The new MRL imaging phantom was scanned across every 30 degrees of the gantry, having the on/off state of the linac in a low-field MRL system using three magnetic resonance imaging sequences: true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP), T1 weighted (T1W), and T2 weighted (T2W). The DICOM files were used to calculate the imaging parameters: geometric distortion, uniformity, resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and laser alignment. The point spread function (PSF) and edge spread function (ESF) were also calculated for resolution analysis. Results: The phantom data showed a small standard deviation -and high consistency for each imaging parameter. The highest variability in data was observed with the true fast imaging sequence at the calibration angle, which was expected because of low resolution and short scan time (25 sec). The mean magnitude of the largest distortion measured within 200 mm diameter with TrueFISP was 0.31 & PLUSMN; 0.05 mm. The PSF, ESF, signal uni-formity, and SNR measurements remained consistent. Laser alignment traditional offsets and angular deviation remained consistent. Conclusions: The new MRL imaging phantom is reliable, reproducible, time effective, and easy to use for a 0.35 T MRL system. The results promise a more streamlined, time-saving, and error-free QA process for low-field MRL adapted in our clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feasibility of in vivo diffusion weighted imaging on a 0.35 T MRI-guided linear accelerator
    Weygand, J.
    Armstrong, T.
    Bryant, J.
    Andreozzi, J.
    Oraiqat, I. M.
    Liveringhouse, C. L.
    Latifi, K.
    Yamoah, K.
    Costello, J. R.
    Moros, E. G.
    El Naqa, I. M.
    Naghavi, A. O.
    Rosenberg, S. A.
    Redler, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1549 - S1551
  • [22] Quality assurance of human functional magnetic resonance imaging: a literature review
    Lu, Weizhao
    Doug, Kejiang
    Cui, Dong
    Jiao, Qing
    Qiu, Jianfeng
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2019, 9 (06) : 1147 - 1162
  • [23] Design of a fused phantom for quantitative evaluation of brain metabolites and enhanced quality assurance testing for magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy
    Song, Kyu-Ho
    Kim, Sang-Young
    Lee, Do-Wan
    Jung, Jin-Young
    Lee, Jung-Hoon
    Baek, Hyeon-Man
    Choe, Bo-Young
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2015, 255 : 75 - 84
  • [24] The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance update
    Schneider, E.
    NessAiver, M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2013, 21 (01) : 110 - 116
  • [25] Protocol for magnetic resonance imaging acquisition, quality assurance, and quality check for the Accelerator program for Discovery in Brain disorders using Stem cells
    Parekh, Pravesh
    Bhalerao, Gaurav V.
    Rao, Rashmi
    Sreeraj, Vanteemar S.
    Holla, Bharath
    Saini, Jitender
    Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan
    John, John P.
    Jain, Sanjeev
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03)
  • [26] Automated linear accelerator quality assurance using a commercial cylindrical calibration phantom
    Mamalui-Hunter, M.
    Li, H.
    Low, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2533 - 2533
  • [27] A standard system phantom for magnetic resonance imaging
    Stupic, Karl F.
    Ainslie, Maureen
    Boss, Michael A.
    Charles, Cecil
    Dienstfrey, Andrew M.
    Evelhoch, Jeffrey L.
    Finn, Paul
    Gimbutas, Zydrunas
    Gunter, Jeffrey L.
    Hill, Derek L. G.
    Jack, Clifford R.
    Jackson, Edward F.
    Karaulanov, Todor
    Keenan, Kathryn E.
    Liu, Guoying
    Martin, Michele N.
    Prasad, Pottumarthi, V
    Rentz, Nikki S.
    Yuan, Chun
    Russek, Stephen E.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 86 (03) : 1194 - 1211
  • [28] Functional magnetic resonance imaging reference phantom
    Renvall, Ville
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (05) : 701 - 708
  • [29] Evaluating Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a New Design of Phantom: Validation with Fast Megavoltage Fluoroscopic Imaging
    Chang, Z.
    Cai, J.
    Wang, Z.
    Yin, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [30] Development and validation of a novel large field of view phantom and a software module for the quality assurance of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Hammoud, Rabih
    McGarry, Maeve
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    Perkins, Gregory
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 33 (07) : 939 - 949