The evolutionary ecology of fungal killer phenotypes

被引:4
|
作者
Travers-Cook, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ]
Jokela, Jukka [1 ,2 ]
Buser, Claudia C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Integrat Biol, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Eawag, Dept Aquat Ecol, Dubendorf, Switzerland
关键词
allelopathy; coevolution; competition; symbiosis; toxin; virus; DOUBLE-STRANDED-RNA; YEAST KILLER; KLUYVEROMYCES-LACTIS; INTERFERENCE COMPETITION; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; MULTICELLULAR COOPERATION; MOLECULAR-MECHANISMS; GENOME ORGANIZATION; POPULATION-GENETICS; TOXIN PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2023.1108
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ecological interactions influence evolutionary dynamics by selecting upon fitness variation within species. Antagonistic interactions often promote genetic and species diversity, despite the inherently suppressive effect they can have on the species experiencing them. A central aim of evolutionary ecology is to understand how diversity is maintained in systems experiencing antagonism. In this review, we address how certain single-celled and dimorphic fungi have evolved allelopathic killer phenotypes that engage in antagonistic interactions. We discuss the evolutionary pathways to the production of lethal toxins, the functions of killer phenotypes and the consequences of competition for toxin producers, their competitors and toxin-encoding endosymbionts. Killer phenotypes are powerful models because many appear to have evolved independently, enabling across-phylogeny comparisons of the origins, functions and consequences of allelopathic antagonism. Killer phenotypes can eliminate host competitors and influence evolutionary dynamics, yet the evolutionary ecology of killer phenotypes remains largely unknown. We discuss what is known and what remains to be ascertained about killer phenotype ecology and evolution, while bringing their model system properties to the reader's attention.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Killer antibodies in fungal infections
    Conti, S
    Magliani, W
    Fisicaro, P
    Dieci, E
    Arseni, S
    Salati, A
    Polonelli, L
    RESEARCH IN IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 149 (4-5): : 334 - 343
  • [22] The Ecology and Evolution of Stoichiometric Phenotypes
    Leal, Miguel C.
    Seehausen, Ole
    Matthews, Blake
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 32 (02) : 108 - 117
  • [23] The Evolutionary Ecology of Metamorphosis
    ten Brink, Hanna
    de Roos, Andre M.
    Dieckmann, Ulf
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2019, 193 (05): : E116 - E131
  • [24] The evolutionary ecology of ethanol
    Bowland, Anna C.
    Melin, Amanda D.
    Hosken, David J.
    Hockings, Kimberley J.
    Carrigan, Matthew A.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2025, 40 (01) : 67 - 79
  • [25] Plant evolutionary ecology
    Rausher, MD
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2005, 165 (01) : 2 - 5
  • [26] The evolutionary ecology of senescence
    Monaghan, P.
    Charmantier, A.
    Nussey, D. H.
    Ricklefs, R. E.
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 371 - 378
  • [27] The evolutionary ecology of dispersal
    Dieckmann, U
    O'Hara, B
    Weisser, W
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1999, 14 (03) : 88 - 90
  • [28] Evolutionary Ecology of Fire
    Keeley, Jon E.
    Pausas, Juli G.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2022, 53 : 203 - 225
  • [29] The evolutionary ecology of metacommunities
    Urban, Mark C.
    Leibold, Mathew A.
    Amarasekare, Priyanga
    De Meester, Luc
    Gomulkiewicz, Richard
    Hochberg, Michael E.
    Klausmeier, Christopher A.
    Loeuille, Nicolas
    de Mazancourt, Claire
    Norberg, Jon
    Pantel, Jelena H.
    Strauss, Sharon Y.
    Vellend, Mark
    Wade, Michael J.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (06) : 311 - 317
  • [30] The evolutionary ecology of deception
    Mokkonen, Mikael
    Lindstedt, Carita
    BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2016, 91 (04) : 1020 - 1035