The new WHO and ICC classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes and their impact on the clinical laboratory

被引:1
|
作者
Bruehl, Frido K. [1 ]
Osman, Mazen M. [1 ]
Chen, Dong [1 ]
Dalland, Joanna C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Div Hematopathol, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
关键词
MDS; Classification; Hematopathology; Myelodysplastic syndrome; ICC; WHO;
D O I
10.1007/s12308-023-00538-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The International Consensus Classification (ICC) and World Health Organization (WHO) proposed significant changes to the diagnostic criteria of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in 2022. The impact of these criteria on hematopathology practice is uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the 2022 ICC and WHO 5th edition classifications on the diagnosis of cytopenias and MDS. Cases from 2021 performed for primary diagnosis of cytopenia(s)/MDS and their clinical, laboratory, and pathologic findings were reviewed and classified according to the new classification systems. The rate of major changes to the diagnosis was determined and potential pitfalls in the diagnostic approach, laboratory workflow, and clinical communication challenges were investigated. A total of 49 cases were recruited. Major changes to the diagnostic entities were made in 18/49 (37%) cases according to the WHO 5th edition, and 23/49 (47%) cases classified according to the ICC. The difference was accounted for by five cases of MDS-EB2 (revised WHO 4th edition) classified as MDS/AML (major change) in the ICC in contrast to no significant change (MDS-IB2) in the WHO 5th edition. MDS-SLD cases were not subject to major reclassification according to either system. The new molecularly defined categories of CCUS/CHIP, MDS-SF3B1, and MDS with biallelic TP53 mutations were almost identically represented in both systems in our cohort. A case of MDS-MLD was reclassified as CMML by both classification systems. There are few but important differences between the new MDS classification systems. A preimplementation assessment is helpful to identify diagnostic and potential clinical impacts of their adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 71
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bone marrow morphology and classification systems in myelodysplastic syndromes
    Aul, Carlo
    GiagounidiS, Aristoteles
    Germing, Ulrich
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2007, 33 : S2 - S5
  • [22] A comparative review of classification systems in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
    Bennett, JM
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2005, 32 (04) : S3 - S10
  • [23] The new WHO classification for acute myeloid leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes:: Is it better than the FAB system?
    Löffler, H
    Haferlach, T
    MEDIZINISCHE WELT, 2000, 51 (11): : 329 - 331
  • [24] Validation of the WHO proposals for a new classification of primary myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 1600 patients
    Germing, U
    Gattermann, N
    Strupp, C
    Aivado, M
    Aul, C
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2000, 24 (12) : 983 - 992
  • [25] Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Overlap Neoplasms and Differential Diagnosis in the WHO and ICC 2022 Era: A Focused Review
    Fontana, Diletta
    Elli, Elena M.
    Pagni, Fabio
    Piazza, Rocco
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [26] New WHO classification for myelodysplasic syndromes
    Ugo, V
    PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE, 2002, 50 (04): : 278 - 282
  • [27] Update on myelodysplastic syndromes: New approaches to classification and therapy
    Langston, AA
    Walling, R
    Winton, EF
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2004, 31 (02) : 72 - 79
  • [28] The WHO classification of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) does make a difference.
    Howe, RB
    Porwit, A
    Wanat, R
    Tehranchi, R
    Hellstrom-Lindberg, E
    BLOOD, 2002, 100 (11) : 790A - 791A
  • [29] The new WHO 2022 and ICC proposals for the classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms. Validation based on the Düsseldorf MDS Registry and proposals for a merged classification
    K. Nachtkamp
    C. Strupp
    M. Vukelja
    A. Kasprzak
    D. Haase
    C. Ganster
    B. Hildebrandt
    B. Betz
    A. Giagounidis
    C. Aul
    S. Blum
    W. K. Hofmann
    M. Pfeilstöcker
    P. Valent
    M. Lübbert
    M. Seidl
    M. Rudelius
    R. Stauder
    O. Krieger
    K. S. Götze
    J. Bobak
    A. Kündgen
    F. Schulz
    S. Dietrich
    G. Kobbe
    N. Gattermann
    U. Germing
    Leukemia, 2024, 38 : 442 - 445
  • [30] The new WHO 2022 and ICC proposals for the classification of myelodysplastic neoplasms. Validation based on the Düsseldorf MDS Registry and proposals for a merged classification
    Nachtkamp, K.
    Strupp, C.
    Vukelja, M.
    Kasprzak, A.
    Haase, D.
    Ganster, C.
    Hildebrandt, B.
    Betz, B.
    Giagounidis, A.
    Aul, C.
    Blum, S.
    Hofmann, W. K.
    Pfeilstoecker, M.
    Valent, P.
    Luebbert, M.
    Seidl, M.
    Rudelius, M.
    Stauder, R.
    Krieger, O.
    Goetze, K. S.
    Bobak, J.
    Kuendgen, A.
    Schulz, F.
    Dietrich, S.
    Kobbe, G.
    Gattermann, N.
    Germing, U.
    LEUKEMIA, 2024, 38 (02) : 386 - 388