Development and External Validation of the STRATified CANcer Surveillance (STRATCANS) Multivariable Model for Predicting Progression in Men with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Starting Active Surveillance

被引:10
|
作者
Light, Alexander [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lophatananon, Artitaya [4 ]
Keates, Alexandra [2 ,3 ]
Thankappannair, Vineetha [2 ]
Barrett, Tristan [5 ,6 ]
Dominguez-Escrig, Jose [7 ]
Rubio-Briones, Jose [7 ]
Benheddi, Toufik [8 ]
Olivier, Jonathan [8 ,9 ]
Villers, Arnauld [8 ,9 ]
Babureddy, Kirthana [10 ]
Abdelmoteleb, Haitham [10 ]
Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Urol Translat Res & Clin Trials Off, Cambridge Biomed Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Div Populat Hlth, Manchester M13 9PL, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Radiol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[6] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[7] Fdn Inst Valenciano Oncol, Dept Urol, Valencia 46009, Spain
[8] Lille Univ, Dept Urol, F-59000 Lille, France
[9] CNRS, Inst Biol Lille, UMR8161, F-59800 Lille, France
[10] Cardiff & Vale Univ Hlth Board, Univ Hosp Wales, Dept Urol, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
关键词
prostate cancer; active surveillance; Cambridge Prognostic Groups (CPG); risk prediction; risk model; non-metastatic disease; MRI; PSA; biopsy; COMPLICATIONS; BIOPSY; GRADE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12010216
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
For men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, we aimed to develop and validate a model to predict the risk of progression on active surveillance (AS), which could inform more personalised AS strategies. In total, 883 men from 3 European centres were used for model development and internal validation, and 151 men from a fourth European centre were used for external validation. Men with Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) 1-2 disease at diagnosis were eligible. The endpoint was progression to the composite endpoint of CPG3 disease or worse (>= CPG3). Model performance at 4 years was evaluated through discrimination (C-index), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The final multivariable model incorporated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Grade Group, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score (Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) or Likert), and prostate volume. Calibration and discrimination were good in both internal validation (C-index 0.742, 95% CI 0.694-0.793) and external validation (C-index 0.845, 95% CI 0.712-0.958). In decision curve analysis, the model offered net benefit compared to a 'follow-all' strategy at risk thresholds of >= 0.08 and >= 0.04 in development and external validation, respectively. In conclusion, our model demonstrated good accuracy and clinical utility in predicting the progression on AS at 4 years post-diagnosis. Men with lower risk predictions could subsequently be offered less-intense surveillance. Further external validation in larger cohorts is now required.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CONDITIONAL SURVIVAL IN MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Bendre, Hersh
    Rumpf, Florian
    Gusev, Andrew
    Wszolek, Matthew
    Dahl, Douglas
    Blute, Michael
    Feldman, Adam S.
    Salari, Keyan
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 : S97 - S97
  • [42] Validation of Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer
    Elamin, Saif
    Bhatt, Nikita Rajiv
    Davis, Niall F.
    Sweeney, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (04) : PC1 - PC3
  • [43] PREDICTING PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS FOLLOWED WITH ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Sternberg, Itay
    Yu, Changhong
    Paz, Gal Keren
    Kim, Philip
    Bernstein, Melanie
    Lakin, Paul
    Kattan, Michael
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Laudone, Vincent
    Scardino, Peter
    Eastham, James
    Touijer, Karim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E459 - E459
  • [44] Predicting progression in patients followed with active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Sternberg, Itay Aharon
    Yu, Changhong
    Paz, Gal Elimelech Keren
    Kim, Philip H.
    Bernstein, Melanie
    Lakin, Paul
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Ehdaie, Behdar
    Laudone, Vincent Paul
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James Andrew
    Touijer, Karim A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (04)
  • [45] Primary androgen deprivation (PAD) followed by active surveillance for newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PC)
    Scholz, Mark Creamer
    Groom, Meg
    Kaddis, Andrew
    Lam, Richard Y.
    Jennrich, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (05)
  • [46] The effect of dual eligibility on the quality of active surveillance in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
    Faraj, Kassem S.
    Dunn, Rodney
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Shahinian, Vahakn B.
    Herrel, Lindsey A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (4_SUPPL) : 266 - 266
  • [47] Active Surveillance as Initial Management of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: Data from the PURC REPLY
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (05): : 936 - 936
  • [48] DECISION AIDS IMPROVE NEWLY DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS UNDERSTANDING OF THE RATIONALE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Seigne, John D.
    Stewart, Telisa
    Clay, Kate
    Kearing, Stephen
    Wason, Shaun
    Heaney, John
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 193 - 193
  • [49] CONTEMPORARY ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE RATES FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS IN COMMUNITY UROLOGY PRACTICES
    Shelton, Jeremy
    Buffington, Phillip
    Koo, Alec
    Shore, Neal
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E27 - E28
  • [50] Impact of a decision aid on newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients' understanding of the rationale for active surveillance
    Formica, Margaret K.
    Wason, Shaun
    Seigne, John D.
    Stewart, Telisa M.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (05) : 812 - 817