Comparing hazard mitigation and climate change adaptation planning approaches

被引:7
|
作者
Matos, Melina [1 ]
Gilbertson, Philip [2 ]
Woodruff, Sierra [3 ]
Meerow, Sara [2 ]
Roy, Malini [1 ]
Hannibal, Bryce [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture, Urban & Reg Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] US Dept State, AAAS Sci & Technol Policy Fellow, Washington, DC 20520 USA
[4] US Census Bur, Salt Lake City, UT USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
climate adaptation plan; hazard mitigation plan; resilience; vulnerability; plan integration; DISASTER RISK REDUCTION; PLANS; VULNERABILITY; FRAMEWORK; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2022.2093171
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Cities are developing hazard mitigation plans (HMP) and climate change adaptation plans (CCAP) with the common aim of proactively reducing vulnerability to future hazards. Yet, they are often treated as distinct planning instruments. Some planning scholars have suggested that HMP and CCAP should be integrated since climate change impacts are increasing and communities have limited time and resources. But, it is unclear how synergistic these two planning approaches are in practice. Focusing on flooding as a key climate-related hazard, this study examines planning frameworks and helps to address this gap by exploring HMPs and CCAPs in three US cities at the forefront of flood resilience planning. We analyze the content of standalone HMPs and CCAPs in Boston, MA, and Seattle, WA, and a combined plan in Baltimore, MD to identify overlaps in practice and explore how, and to what extent, HMPs and CCAPs are synergistic.
引用
收藏
页码:2922 / 2942
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条