Chaotic Aquila Optimization Algorithm for Solving Phase Equilibrium Problems and Parameter Estimation of Semi-empirical Models

被引:3
|
作者
Turgut, Oguz Emrah [1 ]
Turgut, Mert Sinan [2 ]
Kirtepe, Erhan [3 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Dept Ind Engn, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Ege Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Sirnak Univ, Dept Motor Vehicles & Transportat Technol, Sirnak, Turkiye
关键词
Aquila optimization algorithm; Chaotic maps; Parameter estimation; Phase equilibrium; Unconstrained optimization; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; SEARCH; STABILITY; EXPRESSION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s42235-023-00438-7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research study aims to enhance the optimization performance of a newly emerged Aquila Optimization algorithm by incorporating chaotic sequences rather than using uniformly generated Gaussian random numbers. This work employs 25 different chaotic maps under the framework of Aquila Optimizer. It considers the ten best chaotic variants for performance evaluation on multidimensional test functions composed of unimodal and multimodal problems, which have yet to be studied in past literature works. It was found that Ikeda chaotic map enhanced Aquila Optimization algorithm yields the best predictions and becomes the leading method in most of the cases. To test the effectivity of this chaotic variant on real-world optimization problems, it is employed on two constrained engineering design problems, and its effectiveness has been verified. Finally, phase equilibrium and semi-empirical parameter estimation problems have been solved by the proposed method, and respective solutions have been compared with those obtained from state-of-art optimizers. It is observed that CH01 can successfully cope with the restrictive nonlinearities and nonconvexities of parameter estimation and phase equilibrium problems, showing the capabilities of yielding minimum prediction error values of no more than 0.05 compared to the remaining algorithms utilized in the performance benchmarking process.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 526
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CS-PSO: chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems
    Xiaolong Xu
    Hanzhong Rong
    Marcello Trovati
    Mark Liptrott
    Nik Bessis
    Soft Computing, 2018, 22 : 783 - 795
  • [42] Parameter estimation of photovoltaic cells using an improved chaotic whale optimization algorithm
    Oliv, Diego
    Abd El Aziz, Mohamed
    Hassanien, Aboul Ella
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 200 : 141 - 154
  • [43] An Improved Cuckoo Search Optimization Algorithm for the Problem of Chaotic Systems Parameter Estimation
    Wang, Jun
    Zhou, Bihua
    Zhou, Shudao
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 2016
  • [44] Seeker optimization algorithm for parameter estimation of time-delay chaotic systems
    Dai, Chaohua
    Chen, Weirong
    Li, Lixiang
    Zhu, Yunfang
    Yang, Yixian
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 83 (03):
  • [45] Optimization Based Methods for Solving the Equilibrium Problems with Applications in Variational Inequality Problems and Solution of Nash Equilibrium Models
    Rehman, Habib Ur
    Kumam, Poom
    Argyros, Ioannis K.
    Shutaywi, Meshal
    Shah, Zahir
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (05)
  • [46] An Enhanced Chaotic Based Whale Optimization Algorithm For Parameter Extraction of Photovoltaic Models
    Garip, Zeynep
    Cimen, Murat Erhan
    Boz, Ali Fuat
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2022, 25 (03): : 1041 - 1054
  • [47] Semi-empirical models for the estimation of clear sky solar global and direct normal irradiances in the tropics
    Janjai, S.
    Sricharoen, K.
    Pattarapanitchai, S.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (12) : 4749 - 4755
  • [48] Forest height estimation from TanDEM-X images with semi-empirical coherence models
    Praks, Jaan
    Antropov, Oleg
    Olesk, Aire
    Voormansik, Kaupo
    IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 8805 - 8808
  • [49] A two-phase hybrid optimization algorithm for solving complex optimization problems
    Bao, Huiling
    International Journal of Smart Home, 2015, 9 (10): : 27 - 36
  • [50] EXACT PENALTY FUNCTION ALGORITHM FOR SOLVING GENERAL CONSTRAINED PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS
    GESING, W
    DAVISON, EJ
    AUTOMATICA, 1979, 15 (02) : 175 - 188