An evaluation of the EASY instrument in a cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Agel, Julie [1 ]
Ghimire, Umesh [2 ]
Edwards, Nicholas M. [1 ]
Nelson, Bradley [1 ]
Rockwood, Todd [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthoped, 2450 Riverside Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Sch Publ Hlth, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
EASY; Youth; Physical activity; Survey; Scoring methodology; Evaluation of activity surveys in youth; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-024-02158-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of modifying the published scoring system to address identified potential weaknesses in the published scoring system for the Evaluation of Activity Surveys in Youth (EASY). A secondary purpose was to evaluate the EASY on children in Grades 1-5. The EASY is a self-report physical activity instrument for youth.MethodsOriginal EASY survey results were collected at one time point from an online panel from participants across the United States as part of a larger cross-sectional University of Minnesota project looking at children's specific activity and sports participation between June and August 2019. Data was evaluated using three common scoring methods: simple summation, mean, and transformed summation. Data was compared by Grades 1-5 and 6-8.ResultsThe summary statistics of the scores show that there is no statistically significant difference across the scoring methods by population. A paired t-test evaluation of the different scoring methods shows that while the scores are very similar within methodology (simple summation, mean, transformed sum) they are all statistically significantly different from one another, which demonstrates that for any given individual the specific scoring methodology used can result in meaningful differences. The transformed sum provided the strongest methodologic result. Analysis also concluded that administering the scale by proxy to children from grades 1-5 resulted in similar responses to those in Grades 6-8 broadening the appropriate populations able to use this scale.ConclusionThe transformed sum is the preferred scoring method.Trial registrationNot applicable.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the Respiratory Therapy Profession in Ghana: A Cross-sectional Study
    Asante, C.
    Shaheen, R.
    Honny, D.
    Lopez, D.
    Laryea, C. M.
    Alismail, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [32] Anxiety and Tooth Phobia - Psychometric Evaluation in a Cross-sectional Study
    Ferreira, Mariana Andias
    Conceicao Manso, M.
    Gavinha, Sandra
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2008, 49 (02): : 77 - 86
  • [33] A cross-sectional pilot study of the Scottish early development instrument: a tool for addressing inequality
    Lisa Marks Woolfson
    Rosemary Geddes
    Stephanie McNicol
    Josephine N Booth
    John Frank
    BMC Public Health, 13
  • [34] A cross-sectional pilot study of the Scottish early development instrument: a tool for addressing inequality
    Woolfson, Lisa Marks
    Geddes, Rosemary
    McNicol, Stephanie
    Booth, Josephine N.
    Frank, John
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [35] Use of a child health surveillance instrument focusing on growth. A cross-sectional study
    Neves de Araujo, Erika Morganna
    de Oliveira Gouveia, Marcia Teles
    Pedraza, Dixis Figueroa
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 135 (06): : 541 - 547
  • [36] The model for assessing disaster literacy in nurses: Instrument development and cross-sectional validation study
    Zhang, Di
    Zhang, Li-Yan
    Song, Hui-Na
    Zou, Sheng-Qiang
    Cui, Qi
    Zhang, Xiong
    Zhu, Xiao-Fang
    Yin, Hai-Ning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2024, 108
  • [37] A cross-sectional evaluation of perimenopausal depression
    Steinberg, Emma M.
    Rubinow, David R.
    Bartko, John J.
    Fortinsky, Paige M.
    Haq, Nazli
    Thompson, Karla
    Schmidt, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 69 (06) : 973 - 980
  • [38] Cross-sectional evaluation of thoracic lymphoma
    Bae, Young A.
    Lee, Kyung Soo
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 46 (02) : 253 - 264
  • [39] Limitation of a cross-sectional study
    Solem, R. Christian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 148 (02) : 205 - 205
  • [40] INSTRUMENT FOR MEASURING CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF OBJECTS WITH A COMPLEX SHAPE
    VYDRIN, VN
    BARKOV, LA
    PASTUKHO.VV
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES-USSR, 1969, (07): : 1029 - &