Climate Change and the Textile Industry: The Carbon Footprint of Dyes

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Xin [1 ]
Zhu, Lisha [2 ]
Ding, Xuemei [3 ,4 ,5 ,8 ]
Wu, Xiongying [6 ]
Wang, Laili [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Fash Design & Engn, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Int Inst Silk, Coll Text Sci & Engn, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Donghua Univ, Coll Fash & Design, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Int Inst Design & Innovat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Donghua Univ, Key Lab Clothing Design & Technol, Minist Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Shanghai Customs Dist PR China, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Zhejiang Prov Innovat Ctr Adv Text Technol, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[8] Donghua Univ, Coll Fash & Design, Shanghai 200051, Peoples R China
关键词
Disperse dye; Dyeing and printing; Greenhouse gas; Impact assessment; Life cycle assessment; EMISSION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1177/24723444231212954
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
Dyes play an important role in textile production, but their contribution to air pollution and harming human health have raised concerns and remain an international problem. The key to overcoming this challenge is to assess how much greenhouse gases are being generated and the hotspots which guide decision-making process toward more sustainable options. This article established a carbon footprint calculation method for disperse dyes. First, the system boundary description and the functional unit were discussed. Second, the carbon footprint inventory analysis was determined. What's more, the calculation method, allocation method and emission factors were proposed. It was intended to be practical and effective based on three typical disperse dyes in China. The results showed that the carbon footprints of Disperse Blue 79, Disperse Red 167, and Disperse Orange 61 corresponded to 8.28 t CO2 eq/t, 8.07 t CO2 eq/t, and 7.48 t CO2 eq/t, respectively. For the three disperse dyes, the carbon emissions of dispersing agent melamine-formaldehyde resin and liquid ammonia consumption were the dominant emission sources. The steam and electricity were the two major sources of carbon emissions caused by energy usage. The homogenization and the wastewater treatment process were the two largest emission emitters. The sensitivity analysis showed that the total product carbon footprint was mostly sensitive to dispersing agent melamine-formaldehyde resin changes, followed by steam, liquid ammonia, and electricity. The results show that disperse dye production have great potential for improvement. The reduction options for the emissions of the disperse dyes production can be concluded by the optimization of the production process and technology for dispersing agent melamine-formaldehyde resin, liquid ammonia, electricity, and steam. Through the calculation, the influencing factors for the carbon footprint can be analyzed and highlighted. The method provides a comprehensive understanding of environmental impacts with dyes, driving the adoption of sustainable dyeing practices.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 123
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corporate water footprint of textile industry: methodology and case study
    Sun, Qing-Qing
    Huang, Xin-Yu
    Shi, Lei
    2014, 27 (08): : 910 - 914
  • [42] Climate concern elasticity of carbon footprint
    Leferink, Enar Kornelius
    Heinonen, Jukka
    Ala-Mantila, Sanna
    arnadottir, Arora
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 5 (07):
  • [43] Silk industry and carbon footprint mitigation
    Giacomin, A. M.
    Garcia, J. B., Jr.
    Zonatti, W. F.
    Silva-Santos, M. C.
    Laktim, M. C.
    Baruque-Ramos, J.
    17TH WORLD TEXTILE CONFERENCE AUTEX 2017 - SHAPING THE FUTURE OF TEXTILES, 2017, 254
  • [44] WEBINAR "CARBON FOOTPRINT IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY"
    Polaczek, Jerzy
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2024, 103 (04): : 458 - 459
  • [46] Aluminum Production in the Times of Climate Change: The Global Challenge to Reduce the Carbon Footprint and Prevent Carbon Leakage
    Gudrun Saevarsdottir
    Halvor Kvande
    Barry J. Welch
    JOM, 2020, 72 : 296 - 308
  • [47] Aluminum Production in the Times of Climate Change: The Global Challenge to Reduce the Carbon Footprint and Prevent Carbon Leakage
    Saevarsdottir, Gudrun
    Kvande, Halvor
    Welch, Barry J.
    JOM, 2020, 72 (01) : 296 - 308
  • [48] A Carbon Footprint of Textile Recycling A Case Study in Sweden
    Zamani, Bahareh
    Om, Magdalena Svanstr
    Peters, Gregory
    Rydberg, Tomas
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 19 (04) : 676 - 687
  • [49] Carbon footprint evaluation of cellulosic fiber textile and garment
    Feng, Qiuyu
    Wang, Yaqing
    Xia, Zhuying
    Xu, Xiaofang
    Wang, Laili
    CELLULOSE, 2025, 32 (05) : 2889 - 2900
  • [50] Textile Carbon Footprint Assessment: Theory, Reality and Choices
    Liu, Xin-Lei
    Du, Chong
    Zhou, Xiao-Wen
    Wang, Li-Hua
    TEXTILE BIOENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 2011, : 618 - 622