Realist review of community coalitions and outreach interventions to increase access to primary care for vulnerable populations: a realist review

被引:2
|
作者
Welch, Vivian [1 ]
Pottie, Kevin [2 ]
Gaudet, Caroline [1 ]
Thuku, Micere [2 ]
Mallard, Ryan [3 ]
Spenceley, Shannon [4 ]
Amjed, Nida [5 ]
Wadhwani, Arpana [1 ]
Ghogomu, Elizabeth [1 ]
Scott, Cathie [6 ]
Dahrouge, Simone [2 ]
机构
[1] Bruyere Res Inst, Methods Ctr, 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON K1R 7G5, Canada
[2] Bruyere Res Inst, CT Lamont Primary Hlth Care Res Ctr CTLC, 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON K1R 7G5, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[4] Univ Lethbridge, 4401 Univ Dr W, Lethbridge, AB T1K 6T5, Canada
[5] Lakehead Univ, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
[6] PolicyWise Children & Families, 1000, 9925 109 St, Edmonton, AB T5K 2J8, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Realist Review; Vulnerable; Coalition; Mobile service; RE-AIM; Primary Health Care; RE-AIM FRAMEWORK; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; HEALTH; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; UNDERSTAND; ENGAGEMENT; EFFICACY; CLUSTER; HOME;
D O I
10.1186/s13690-023-01105-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundThere are meaningful gaps in equitable access to Primary Health Care (PHC), especially for vulnerable populations after widespread reforms in Western countries. The Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) research program is a Canadian-Australian collaboration that aims to improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations. Relationships were developed with stakeholders in six regions across Canada and Australia where access-related needs could be identified. The most promising interventions would be implemented and tested to address the needs identified. This realist review was conducted to understand how community coalition and outreach (e.g., mobile or pop-up) services improve access for underserved vulnerable residents.ObjectiveTo inform the development and delivery of an innovative intervention to increase access to PHC for vulnerable populations.MethodsA realist review was conducted in collaboration with the Local Innovative Partnership (LIP) research team and the IMPACT research members who conducted the review. We performed an initial comprehensive systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library up to October 19, 2015, and updated it on August 8, 2020. Studies were included if they focused on interventions to improve access to PHC using community coalition, outreach services or mobile delivery methods. We included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), and systematic reviews. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used for data extraction and framework analysis to obtain themes. The LIP research team was also allowed to suggest additional papers not included at screening.ResultsWe included 43 records, comprising 31 RCTs, 11 systematic reviews, and 1 case control study that was added by the LIP research team. We identified three main themes of PHC interventions to promote access for vulnerable residents, including: 1) tailoring of materials and services decreases barriers to primary health care, 2) services offered where vulnerable populations gather increases the "reach" of the interventions, 3) partnerships and collaborations lead to positive health outcomes. In addition, implementation designs and reporting elements should be considered.ConclusionRealist reviews can help guide the development of locally adapted primary health care interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient Views of the Advanced Practitioner Role in Primary Care: A Realist Review
    Morris, Leah
    Walsh, Nicola
    Moule, Pam
    Pearson, Jen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2019, 18
  • [22] Patient Views of the Advanced Practitioner Role in Primary Care: A Realist Review
    Morris, Leah
    Walsh, Nicola
    Moule, Pam
    Pearson, Jen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2019, 18
  • [23] Explaining variations in test ordering in primary care: protocol for a realist review
    Duddy, Claire
    Wong, Geoffrey
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (09):
  • [24] Exercise Interventions for Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Realist Review
    McGrath, Deirdre
    O'Halloran, Peter
    Prue, Gillian
    Brown, Malcolm
    Millar, Joanne
    O'Donnell, Adrina
    McWilliams, Lisa
    Murphy, Claire
    Hinds, Gwyneth
    Reid, Joanne
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (04)
  • [25] Realist evaluation of health promotion interventions: a scoping review
    Malengreaux, Segolene
    Doumont, Dominique
    Scheen, Benedicte
    Van Durme, Therese
    Aujoulat, Isabelle
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (05)
  • [26] Music therapy for palliative care: A realist review
    McConnell, Tracey
    Porter, Sam
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2017, 15 (04) : 454 - 464
  • [27] Referral and access to heart function clinics: A realist review
    Fowokan, Adeleke
    Frankfurter, Claudia
    Dobrow, Mark J.
    Abrahamyan, Lusine
    Mcdonald, Michael
    Virani, Sean
    Harkness, Karen
    Lee, Douglas S.
    Pakosh, Maureen
    Ross, Heather
    Grace, Sherry L.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (04) : 949 - 964
  • [28] Realist inquiry into Maternity care @ a Distance (ARM@DA): realist review protocol
    Evans, Catrin
    Evans, Kerry
    Booth, Andrew
    Timmons, Stephen
    Jones, Nia
    Nazmeen, Benash
    Sunney, Candice
    Clowes, Mark
    Clancy, Georgia
    Spiby, Helen
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [29] Realist Review of Care Models That Include Primary Care for Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors
    Snyder, Claire
    Choi, Youngjee
    Smith, Katherine C.
    Wilson, Renee F.
    Yuan, Christina T.
    Nathan, Paul C.
    Zhang, Allen
    Robinson, Karen A.
    JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2022, 6 (02)
  • [30] Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review
    Grossman, Lisa, V
    Creber, Ruth Masterson
    Benda, Natalie C.
    Wright, Drew
    Vawdrey, David K.
    Ancker, Jessica S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 26 (8-9) : 855 - 870