Implementation of the SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) performance assessment tool in the emergency department: A pilot study

被引:1
|
作者
Haas, Mary R. C. [1 ,5 ]
Davis, Mallory G. [1 ]
Harvey, Carrie E. [1 ]
Huang, Rob [1 ]
Scott, Kirstin W. [2 ]
George, Brian C. [3 ]
Wnuk, Gregory M. [3 ]
Burkhardt, John [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Emergency Med Residency Program, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ctr Surg Training & Res, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med & Learning Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
assessment; competency-based medical education; direct observation; emergency medicine education; feedback; graduate medical education; mobile applications; residency; smartphone; technology-enhanced education; WRITTEN FEEDBACK; COMPETENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/aet2.10842
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundFeedback and assessment are difficult to provide in the emergency department (ED) setting despite their critical importance for competency-based education, and traditional end-of-shift evaluations (ESEs) alone may be inadequate. The SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) mobile application has been successfully implemented and studied in the operative setting for surgical training programs as a point-of-care tool that incorporates three assessment scales in addition to dictated feedback. SIMPL may represent a viable tool for enhancing workplace-based feedback and assessment in emergency medicine (EM). MethodsWe implemented SIMPL at a 4-year EM residency program during a pilot study from March to June 2021 for observable activities such as medical resuscitations and related procedures. Faculty and residents underwent formal rater training prior to launch and were asked to complete surveys regarding the SIMPL app's content, usability, and future directions at the end of the pilot. ResultsA total of 36/58 (62%) of faculty completed at least one evaluation, for a total of 190 evaluations and an average of three evaluations per faculty. Faculty initiated 130/190 (68%) and residents initiated 60/190 (32%) evaluations. Ninety-one percent included dictated feedback. A total of 45/54 (83%) residents received at least one evaluation, with an average of 3.5 evaluations per resident. Residents generally agreed that SIMPL increased the quality of feedback received and that they valued dictated feedback. Residents generally did not value the numerical feedback provided from SIMPL. Relative to the residents, faculty overall responded more positively toward SIMPL. The pilot generated several suggestions to inform the optimization of the next version of SIMPL for EM training programs. ConclusionsThe SIMPL app, originally developed for use in surgical training programs, can be implemented for use in EM residency programs, has positive support from faculty, and may provide important adjunct information beyond current ESEs.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The assessment of dermatological emergencies in the emergency department via telemedicine is safe: a prospective pilot study
    Villa, Luigi
    Matz, Oliver
    Olaciregui Dague, Karmele
    Kluwig, David
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Brokmann, Joerg Christian
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 15 (07) : 1275 - 1279
  • [22] Impact of an education session on clinical handover between medical shifts in an emergency department: A pilot study
    Blyth, Caroline
    Bost, Nerolie
    Shiels, Sue
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2017, 29 (03) : 336 - 341
  • [23] The effects of consecutive night shifts on neuropsychological performance of interns in the emergency department: A pilot study
    Rollinson, DC
    Rathlev, NK
    Moss, M
    Killiany, R
    Sassower, KC
    Auerbach, S
    Fish, SS
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 41 (03) : 400 - 406
  • [24] Psychometric characterization of the obstetric communication assessment tool for medical education: a pilot study
    Rodriguez, A. Noel
    DeWitt, Peter
    Fisher, Jennifer
    Broadfoot, Kirsten
    Hurt, K. Joseph
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 7 : 168 - 179
  • [25] Improving Emergency Department Patient-Physician Conversation Through an Artificial Intelligence Symptom-Taking Tool: Mixed Methods Pilot Observational Study
    Scheder-Bieschin, Justus
    Blumke, Bibiana
    de Buijzer, Erwin
    Cotte, Fabienne
    Echterdiek, Fabian
    Nacsa, Julia
    Ondresik, Marta
    Ott, Matthias
    Paul, Gregor
    Schilling, Tobias
    Schmitt, Anne
    Wicks, Paul
    Gilbert, Stephen
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (02)
  • [26] USE OF THE PEPTEST™ TOOL IN PATIENTS ADMITTED FOR CHEST PAIN I N THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A PILOT STUDY
    Petruzziello, C.
    Franceschi, F.
    Ojetti, V.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2018, 50 (02) : E180 - E180
  • [27] Learning medical professionalism with the online concordance-of-judgment learning tool (CJLT): A pilot study
    Foucault, Amelie
    Dube, Serge
    Fernandez, Nicolas
    Gagnon, Robert
    Charlin, Bernard
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2015, 37 (10) : 955 - 960
  • [28] Ultrasound and NICOM in the assessment of fluid responsiveness in patients with mild sepsis in the emergency department: a pilot study
    Oord, Martha
    Olgers, Tycho J.
    Doff-Holman, Mirjam
    Harms, Mark P. M.
    Ligtenberg, Jack J. M.
    ter Maaten, Jan C.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (01):
  • [29] ASSESSMENT OF RISK TOLERANCE FOR ADVERSE EVENTS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT CHEST PAIN PATIENTS: A PILOT STUDY
    Brown, Todd B.
    Cofield, Stacey S.
    Iyer, Anand
    Lai, Robin
    Milteer, Hugh
    Queen, Brannon
    Schwab, Mark H.
    Menchine, Michael
    Schriger, David L.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 39 (02): : 247 - 251
  • [30] Improving the view on non-mydriatic fundus photography implementation in the emergency department: A qualitative description study
    Browning, Samuel D.
    Dunn, Hamish P.
    Thomson, David
    Keay, Lisa
    McCluskey, Peter
    White, Andrew
    Fraser, Clare
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 49 (08): : 930 - 930