Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model

被引:14
|
作者
Wang, Yunhe [1 ]
Yuan, Xiaojun [2 ]
Ren, Yibin [1 ]
Bushuk, Mitchell [3 ]
Shu, Qi [4 ]
Li, Cuihua [2 ]
Li, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, CAS Key Lab Ocean Circulat & Waves, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY 10964 USA
[3] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 1, Qingdao, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Antarctic; sea ice prediction; PREDICTABILITY; FORECAST; IMPACTS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1029/2023GL104347
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Antarctic sea ice concentration (SIC) prediction at seasonal scale has been documented, but a gap remains at subseasonal scale (1-8 weeks) due to limited understanding of ice-related physical mechanisms. To overcome this limitation, we developed a deep learning model named Sea Ice Prediction Network (SIPNet) that can predict SIC without the need to account for complex physical processes. Compared to mainstream dynamical models like European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, and Seamless System for Prediction and Earth System Research developed at Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, as well as a relatively advanced statistical model like the linear Markov model, SIPNet outperforms them all, effectively filling the gap in subseasonal Antarctic SIC prediction capability. SIPNet results indicate that autumn SIC variability contributes the most to sea ice predictability, whereas spring contributes the least. In addition, the Weddell Sea displays the highest sea ice predictability, while predictability is low in the West Pacific. SIPNet can also capture the signal of ENSO and SAM on sea ice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cyclostationary EOF Modes of Antarctic Sea Ice and Their Application in Prediction
    Pei, Yuhua
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2021, 126 (10)
  • [32] The role of bias correction on subseasonal prediction of Arctic sea ice during summer 2018
    Jiechen Zhao
    Qi Shu
    Chunhua Li
    Xingren Wu
    Zhenya Song
    Fangli Qiao
    ActaOceanologicaSinica, 2020, 39 (09) : 50 - 59
  • [33] An Explainable Deep Learning Model for Daily Sea Ice Concentration Forecast
    Li, Yang
    Qiu, Yubao
    Jia, Guoqiang
    Yu, Shuwen
    Zhang, Yixiao
    Huang, Lin
    Lepparanta, Matti
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 62 : 1 - 17
  • [34] MICROBIOLOGY OF ANTARCTIC SEA-ICE - MICROALGAE AND ANTARCTIC SEA-ICE
    BUNT, JS
    WOOD, EJF
    NATURE, 1963, 199 (490) : 1254 - &
  • [35] Modeling of Antarctic sea ice in a general circulation model
    Wu, XR
    Simmonds, I
    Budd, WF
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 1997, 10 (04) : 593 - 609
  • [36] A Markov model for seasonal forecast of Antarctic sea ice
    Chen, DK
    Yuan, XJ
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2004, 17 (16) : 3156 - 3168
  • [37] Regional characteristics of sea level variation in the Southern Ocean with relation to Antarctic sea ice
    Chen, G
    Ezraty, R
    He, MX
    THIRD ERS SYMPOSIUM ON SPACE AT THE SERVICE OF OUR ENVIRONMENT, VOLS. II & III, 1997, 414 : 963 - 966
  • [38] Assimilation of SMOS sea ice thickness in the regional ice prediction system
    Gupta, Mukesh
    Caya, Alain
    Buehner, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 42 (12) : 4583 - 4606
  • [39] Impact of Antarctic ice shelf basal melting on sea ice and deep ocean properties
    Hellmer, HH
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (10) : L103071 - 4
  • [40] An ocean-sea ice model study of the unprecedented Antarctic sea ice minimum in 2016
    Kusahara, Kazuya
    Reid, Phillip
    Williams, Guy D.
    Massom, Robert
    Hasumi, Hiroyasu
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (08):