A web-based software for group decision with analytic hierarchy process

被引:4
|
作者
Francozoa, Rafael Verdo [1 ]
Urquiza Junior, Luiz Sergio Velasquez [1 ]
Carrapateira, Elana Souza [1 ]
Pacheco, Bruna Cristine Scarduelli [2 ]
Oliveira, Marcio Teixeira [1 ]
Torsoni, Guilherme Botega [1 ]
Yari, Jiyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Educ Sci & Technol Mato Grosso, Cuiaba, Brazil
[2] Univ Araraquara, Araraquara, Brazil
关键词
Open-source software; Decision support systems; Software for OR; CONSISTENCY INDEX; AHP; PRIORITIES; TRANSITIVITY; JUDGMENTS; PAIRWISE; RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.mex.2023.102277
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multi-criteria decision support method and is widely applied in many areas. The original AHP method proposed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s re-quires (n 2-n)/2 comparisons. The number of required comparisons can make using this method challenging for maintaining consistent judgments in problems involving many criteria and/or alternatives. Furthermore, the available software is platform-dependent and generally does not support group decision-making. In this paper, we present software for AHP that demands n-1 com-parisons. Additionally, the software supports group decision-making using individual aggregation of priorities with arithmetic and geometric means. The system is available at http://ahpweb.net/ and is accessible from any internet-connected device. It currently has more than 100 users and dozens of decision problems in various areas.& BULL; The original AHP formulation requires (n 2-n)/2 comparisons per cluster which makes it dif-ficult to make consistent judgments.& BULL; AHP avaliable software does not enable group decision making.& BULL; The proposed system AHP-WEB fills these gaps. The method demands n-1 comparisons per cluster without any inconsistency and allows group decision making on a web system.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] HOW TO MAKE A DECISION - THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    SAATY, TL
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (01) : 9 - 26
  • [42] HOW TO MAKE A DECISION - THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    SAATY, TL
    INTERFACES, 1994, 24 (06) : 19 - 43
  • [43] ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR SPATIAL DECISION MAKING
    Ozturk, Derya
    Batuk, Fatmagul
    SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2010, 28 (02): : 124 - 137
  • [44] Group Awareness Information in Web-Based Group Decision Support System
    Jongsawat, Nipat
    Premchaiswadi, Wichian
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2009), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 370 - 375
  • [45] Analytic hierarchy process based decision modelling in CAPP development tools
    Liu D.
    Duan G.
    Lei N.
    Wang J.-S.
    International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1999, 15 (01): : 26 - 31
  • [46] Bank Credit Decision Analysis Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Zhao, Di
    Lin, Fuan
    Gu, Ruonan
    Peng, Haoran
    Yan, Tingting
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2021), 2021, : 3853 - 3858
  • [47] Selection Of Web-Based Framework for System Development using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) Method in PT. XYZ
    Gunawan, Ali
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY (ICIMTECH), 2020, : 148 - 152
  • [48] Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process- Preface
    Whitaker, Rozann
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2007, 46 (7-8) : 837 - 839
  • [49] Group Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Tutorial
    Hummel, J. Marjan
    Bridges, John F. P.
    IJzerman, Maarten J.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (02): : 129 - 140
  • [50] Group Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Tutorial
    J. Marjan Hummel
    John F. P. Bridges
    Maarten J. IJzerman
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014, 7 : 129 - 140