Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses

被引:2
|
作者
Uhlikova, Tereza [1 ]
Vihma, Timo [2 ]
Karpechko, Alexey Yu [2 ]
Uotila, Petteri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Inst Atmospher & Earth Syst Res, Fac Sci, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[2] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki, Finland
来源
CRYOSPHERE | 2024年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
HEAT FLUXES; TEMPERATURE; WINTER; MODEL; LEADS; COEFFICIENTS; BOUNDARY; MOMENTUM; POLYNYAS; LAYER;
D O I
10.5194/tc-18-957-2024
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
A prerequisite for understanding the local, regional, and hemispherical impacts of Arctic sea-ice decline on the atmosphere is to quantify the effects of sea-ice concentration (SIC) on the turbulent surface fluxes of sensible and latent heat in the Arctic. We analyse these effects utilising four global atmospheric reanalyses, ERA5, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and NCEP/CFSR (including both the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and the NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2)), and evaluate their uncertainties arising from inter-reanalysis differences in SIC and in the sensitivity of the turbulent surface fluxes to SIC. The magnitude of the differences in SIC is up to 0.15 but typically around 0.05 in most of the Arctic over all four seasons. Orthogonal-distance regression and ordinary-least-squares regression analyses indicate that the greatest sensitivity of both the latent and the sensible heat flux to SIC occurs in the cold season, November to April. For these months, using daily means of data, the average sensitivity is 400 W m - 2 for the latent heat flux and over 800 W m - 2 for the sensible heat flux per unit of SIC (change in SIC from 0 to 1), with differences between reanalyses that are as large as 300 W m - 2 for the latent heat flux and 600 W m - 2 for the sensible heat flux per unit of SIC. The sensitivity is highest for the NCEP/CFSR reanalysis. Comparing the periods 1980-2000 and 2001-2021, we find that the effect of SIC on turbulent surface fluxes has weakened owing to the increasing surface temperature of sea ice and sea-ice decline. The results also indicate signs of a decadal-scale improvement in the mutual agreement between reanalyses. The effect of SIC on turbulent surface fluxes arises mostly via the effect of SIC on atmosphere-surface differences in temperature and specific humidity, whereas the effect of SIC on wind speed (via surface roughness and atmospheric-boundary-layer stratification) partly cancels out in the turbulent surface fluxes, as the wind speed increases the magnitudes of both upward and downward fluxes.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 976
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thinning of the Arctic sea-ice cover
    Rothrock, DA
    Yu, Y
    Maykut, GA
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1999, 26 (23) : 3469 - 3472
  • [32] REVERBERATION UNDER ARCTIC SEA-ICE
    BROWN, JR
    MILNE, AR
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1967, 42 (01): : 78 - &
  • [33] Anomalies of sea-ice transports in the Arctic
    Martin, Torge
    Martin, Thomas
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, VOL 44, 2006, 2006, 44 : 310 - +
  • [34] ARCTIC AND ANTARCTIC SEA-ICE MODEL
    WASHINGTON, WM
    SEMTNER, AJ
    PARKINSON, C
    MORRISON, L
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1976, 57 (12): : 936 - 936
  • [35] The Arctic sea-ice navigability index
    Gupta, Mukesh
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2021, 121 (04): : 567 - 570
  • [36] ARCTIC SEA-ICE EXTENT AND THICKNESS
    WADHAMS, P
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1995, 352 (1699): : 301 - 319
  • [37] REVERBERATION UNDER ARCTIC SEA-ICE
    BROWN, JR
    BROWN, DW
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1966, 40 (02): : 399 - &
  • [38] Arctic sea-ice variability revisited
    Stroeve, Julienne
    Frei, Allan
    McCreight, James
    Ghatak, Debjani
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, VOL 48, 2008, 48 : 71 - 81
  • [40] Influence of the Arctic Sea-Ice Regime Shift on Sea-Ice Methylated Mercury Trends
    Schartup, Amina T.
    Soerensen, Anne L.
    Heimburger-Boavida, Lars-Eric
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 7 (10) : 708 - 713