Designathons in health research: a global systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Tieosapjaroen, Warittha [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Elizabeth [3 ]
Ritchwood, Tiarney [4 ]
Li, Chunyan [5 ]
Conklin, Jamie L. [6 ]
Babatunde, Abdulhammed Opeyemi [7 ]
Ongkeko, Arturo M. [8 ,9 ]
Nwaozuru, Ucheoma [10 ]
Tucker, Joseph D. [11 ,12 ]
Castillo Carandang, Nina T. [9 ,13 ]
Ong, Jason J. [1 ,2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hlth, Melbourne Sexual Hlth Ctr, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Behav, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo Coll, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Univ N Carolina, Hlth Sci Lib, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ Ibadan, Coll Med, Fac Clin Sci, Med & Surg, Ibadan, Nigeria
[8] Univ Philippines Manila, Natl Inst Hlth, Manila, Philippines
[9] Fdn Advancement Clin Epidemiol Inc, Manila, Philippines
[10] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Implementat Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[11] Univ N Carolina, Inst Global Hlth & Infect Dis, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[12] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Clin Res Dept, London, England
[13] Univ Philippines Manila, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Manila, Philippines
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 9卷 / 03期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic review; Health policies and all other topics; Public Health; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013961
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction A designathon is a three-stage participatory activity informed by design thinking. There is a growing literature on designathons in health. This study synthesised designathons' effectiveness and implementation-related factors to address health challenges.Methods We searched Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for articles containing primary data on designathons for health from their dates of inception to 29 November 2022. We retrieved additional studies from citation searching and a complementary open call. We synthesised data on designathons' effectiveness (ie, engagement, outputs and implementation), required resources and implementation-related factors (ie, resources, facilitators, barriers, strengths and limitations). We assessed the risk of bias using a checklist adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools.Results In total, 4973 citations were identified, and 42 studies were included. In total, 26 studies (62%) were from high-income countries. The median number of total participants was 49, divided into a median of 8 teams. The duration of the intensive collaboration phase ranged from 3 hours to 7 days. Common evaluation criteria were feasibility, innovation and impact. Idea and prototype outputs included mobile phone applications, educational programmes and medical devices. Interventions developed from a designathon was estimated to be highly cost-effective. The most common facilitators were interdisciplinary participants and high-quality mentorship. The most common barriers were suboptimal execution of the events, difficulties in balancing interdisciplinary participants across teams and limited support for participants along the process. There were limited data on required resources and further implementation of solutions after designathons.Conclusion Given designathons' adaptability in terms of budget, mode of delivery, type of output and involvement of diverse participants, including end users, designathons can be implemented in a wide range of contexts to address various health issues.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023389685.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inclusion of Children With Disabilities in Health Research: A Systematic Review
    Njelesani, Janet
    Lowinger, Danielle
    Rezak, Sara
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2021, 75
  • [32] A decade of research on housing and health: a systematic literature review
    Alidoust, Sara
    Huang, Wei
    REVIEWS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 38 (01) : 45 - 64
  • [33] A Systematic Review of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery
    Baxter, Natalie B.
    Howard, Julia C.
    Chung, Kevin C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (03) : 529E - 537E
  • [34] Gender in Occupational Health Research of Farmworkers: A Systematic Review
    Habib, Rima R.
    Hojeij, Safa
    Elzein, Kareem
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2014, 57 (12) : 1344 - 1367
  • [35] Improving assent in health research: a rapid systematic review
    Soll, Dominik
    Guraiib, Maria Magdalena
    Rollins, Nigel Campbell
    Reis, Andreas Alois
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [36] The use of research in public health policy: a systematic review
    Masood, Sara
    Kothari, Anita
    Regan, Sandra
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2020, 16 (01): : 7 - 43
  • [37] A Systematic Review of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery
    Naga, Hani I.
    Levin, L. Scott
    Butler, Paris D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (06) : 1067E - 1068E
  • [38] Youth engagement in mental health research: A systematic review
    McCabe, Erin
    Amarbayan, Mungunzul
    Rabi, Sarah
    Mendoza, Justino
    Naqvi, Syeda Farwa
    Bajgain, Kalpana Thapa
    Zwicker, Jennifer D.
    Santana, Maria
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (01) : 30 - 50
  • [39] Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review
    Moher, David
    Weeks, Laura
    Ocampo, Mary
    Seely, Dugald
    Sampson, Margaret
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Miller, Donald
    Simera, Iveta
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Hoey, John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (07) : 718 - 742
  • [40] Digital Storytelling as a Method in Health Research: A Systematic Review
    West, Christina H.
    Rieger, Kendra L.
    Kenny, Amanda
    Chooniedass, Rishma
    Mitchell, Kim M.
    Klippenstein, Andrea Winther
    Zaborniak, Amie-Rae
    Demczuk, Lisa
    Scott, Shannon D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2022, 21