Designathons in health research: a global systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Tieosapjaroen, Warittha [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Elizabeth [3 ]
Ritchwood, Tiarney [4 ]
Li, Chunyan [5 ]
Conklin, Jamie L. [6 ]
Babatunde, Abdulhammed Opeyemi [7 ]
Ongkeko, Arturo M. [8 ,9 ]
Nwaozuru, Ucheoma [10 ]
Tucker, Joseph D. [11 ,12 ]
Castillo Carandang, Nina T. [9 ,13 ]
Ong, Jason J. [1 ,2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hlth, Melbourne Sexual Hlth Ctr, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Behav, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo Coll, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Univ N Carolina, Hlth Sci Lib, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ Ibadan, Coll Med, Fac Clin Sci, Med & Surg, Ibadan, Nigeria
[8] Univ Philippines Manila, Natl Inst Hlth, Manila, Philippines
[9] Fdn Advancement Clin Epidemiol Inc, Manila, Philippines
[10] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Implementat Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[11] Univ N Carolina, Inst Global Hlth & Infect Dis, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[12] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Clin Res Dept, London, England
[13] Univ Philippines Manila, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Manila, Philippines
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 9卷 / 03期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic review; Health policies and all other topics; Public Health; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013961
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction A designathon is a three-stage participatory activity informed by design thinking. There is a growing literature on designathons in health. This study synthesised designathons' effectiveness and implementation-related factors to address health challenges.Methods We searched Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for articles containing primary data on designathons for health from their dates of inception to 29 November 2022. We retrieved additional studies from citation searching and a complementary open call. We synthesised data on designathons' effectiveness (ie, engagement, outputs and implementation), required resources and implementation-related factors (ie, resources, facilitators, barriers, strengths and limitations). We assessed the risk of bias using a checklist adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools.Results In total, 4973 citations were identified, and 42 studies were included. In total, 26 studies (62%) were from high-income countries. The median number of total participants was 49, divided into a median of 8 teams. The duration of the intensive collaboration phase ranged from 3 hours to 7 days. Common evaluation criteria were feasibility, innovation and impact. Idea and prototype outputs included mobile phone applications, educational programmes and medical devices. Interventions developed from a designathon was estimated to be highly cost-effective. The most common facilitators were interdisciplinary participants and high-quality mentorship. The most common barriers were suboptimal execution of the events, difficulties in balancing interdisciplinary participants across teams and limited support for participants along the process. There were limited data on required resources and further implementation of solutions after designathons.Conclusion Given designathons' adaptability in terms of budget, mode of delivery, type of output and involvement of diverse participants, including end users, designathons can be implemented in a wide range of contexts to address various health issues.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023389685.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enhancing systematic review with machine learning modelling for global health research
    Luo, Yuan
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 5 (01): : E2 - E3
  • [2] Key competencies for global health research: systematic literature review and mapping
    Saint, V
    Detering, B.
    Franke, A.
    Eger, H.
    Oppenberg, J.
    Rohleder, S.
    Bozorgmehr, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 34
  • [3] Systematic mapping of global research on climate and health: a machine learning review
    Berrang-Ford, Lea
    Sietsma, Anne J.
    Callaghan, Max
    Minx, Jan C.
    Scheelbeek, Pauline F. D.
    Haddaway, Neal R.
    Haines, Andy
    Dangour, Alan D.
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2021, 5 (08): : E514 - E525
  • [4] A global perspective of Indigenous child health research: a systematic review of longitudinal studies
    Lloyd-Johnsen, Catherine
    Eades, Sandra
    McNamara, Bridgette
    D'Aprano, Anita
    Goldfeld, Sharon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (05) : 1554 - 1568
  • [5] Global Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Data Governance in Health Research: A systematic review
    Griffiths, Kalinda
    Wallace, Tessa
    Vajdic, Claire
    Jorm, Louisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 50 : 87 - 87
  • [6] Health impacts of flooding: A global systematic review
    Ahern, M
    Kovats, S
    Matthies, F
    Few, R
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (04) : S125 - S126
  • [7] Indoor temperature and health: a global systematic review
    Tham, S.
    Thompson, R.
    Landeg, O.
    Murray, K. A.
    Waite, T.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 179 : 9 - 17
  • [8] Heatwave and health impact research: A global review
    Campbell, Sharon
    Remenyi, Tomas A.
    White, Christopher J.
    Johnston, Fay H.
    HEALTH & PLACE, 2018, 53 : 210 - 218
  • [9] A systematic review of cannabis health warning research
    Massey, Zachary B.
    Hammond, David
    Froeliger, Brett
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 37
  • [10] Research culture in allied health: a systematic review
    Borkowski, Donna
    McKinstry, Carol
    Cotchett, Matthew
    Williams, Cylie
    Haines, Terry
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2016, 22 (04) : 294 - 303