Moving forward through consensus: a national Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in prostate cancer in Uganda

被引:0
|
作者
Ssemata, Andrew Sentoogo [1 ,2 ]
Muhumuza, Richard [1 ]
Seeley, Janet [1 ,2 ]
Lombe, Dorothy Chilambe [3 ]
Mwamba, Monde [4 ]
Msadabwe, Susan [5 ]
Mwaka, Amos Deogratius [6 ,7 ]
Aggarwal, Ajay [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] MRC UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Res Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Global Hlth & Dev, London, England
[3] Midcent Dist Hlth Board, Radiat Oncol, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[4] Univ Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
[5] Canc Dis Hosp, Lusaka, Zambia
[6] Makerere Univ, Mulago Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kampala, Uganda
[7] Gulu Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, Gulu, Uganda
[8] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
[9] Kings Coll London, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
Prostate; Primary Health Care; Prostate disease; Quality in health care; Health Services; ONCOLOGY; MORTALITY; KAMPALA; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075739
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To identify key areas for research in prostate cancer (PC) in the Ugandan context by establishing the major health system, socioeconomic and clinical barriers to seeking, reaching and receiving high-quality cancer care. Design Modified Delphi Technique. Setting Government and private-not-for-profit hospitals. Methods We applied a two-stage modified Delphi technique to identify the consensus view across cancer experts. In round 1, experts received a questionnaire containing 21 statements drawn from a systematic review identifying the reason for the delay in accessing cancer care. Each statement was scored out of 20. Statements scoring >= 15 from over 70% of participants were prioritised for inclusion while statements for which <30% of participants gave a score of >= 15 were excluded. Sixteen statements were included in round 2 as they did not receive consensus for inclusion or exclusion. Results We found that the top six research priority areas arise from challenges including: (1) lack of diagnostic services-ultrasound, laboratory tests and biopsy facilities; (2) high costs of services, for example, surgery, radiotherapy, hormone therapy are unaffordable to most patients, (3) lack of essential medicines, (4) limited radiotherapy capacity, (5) lack of awareness of cancer as a disease and low recognition of symptoms, (6) low healthcare literacy. The lack of critical surgical supplies, high diagnostic and treatment costs were ranked highest in order of importance in round 1. Round 2 also revealed lack of diagnostic services, unavailability of critical medicines, lack of radiotherapy options, high costs of treatments and lack of critical surgical supplies as the top priorities. Conclusion These research priority areas ought to be addressed in future research to improve prompt PC diagnosis and care in Uganda. There is need to improve the supply of high-quality affordable anticancer medicines for PC patients so as to improve the survivorship from the cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN THE PSYCHOSOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL-ASPECTS OF CANCER CARE - A GROUP CONSENSUS APPROACH
    ISCOE, NA
    CUNNINGHAM, AJ
    OSOBA, D
    TILL, JE
    HUMANE MEDICINE, 1989, 5 : 26 - 30
  • [22] A consensus development approach to define national research priorities in bone metastases: Proceedings from NCICCTG workshop
    Wu, J
    Bezjak, A
    Chow, E
    Cross, P
    Genest, P
    Grant, N
    Kirkbride, P
    Roy, I
    Whelan, T
    Fitzgibbon, E
    Wong, R
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 15 (08) : 496 - 499
  • [23] Consensus in Bladder Cancer Research Priorities Between Patients and Healthcare Professionals Using a Four-stage Modified Delphi Method
    Bessa, Agustina
    Maclennan, Steven
    Enting, Deborah
    Bryan, Richard
    Josephs, Debra
    Hughes, Simon
    Amery, Suzanne
    Khan, Muhammad Shamim
    Malde, Sachin
    Nair, Rajesh
    Cahill, Fidelma
    Wylie, Harriet
    Thurairaja, Ramesh
    Chatterton, Kathryn
    Kinsella, Netty
    Haggstrom, Christel
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (02) : 258 - 259
  • [24] Top 10 research priorities relating to stroke nursing: a rigorous approach to establish a national nurse-led research agenda
    Rowat, Anne
    Pollock, Alex
    St George, Bridget
    Cowey, Eileen
    Booth, Joanne
    Lawrence, Maggie
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (11) : 2831 - 2843
  • [25] Best Current Practice and Research Priorities in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-A Report of a Movember International Consensus Meeting
    Moore, Caroline M.
    King, Lauren E.
    Withington, John
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Andrews, Mark
    Briers, Erik
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Chinegwundoh, Francis I.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Crowe, Jane
    Finelli, Antonio
    Fitch, Margaret I.
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Giganti, Francesco
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Freeman, John
    Gallo, Joseph
    Gibbs, Stephen
    Henry, Anthony
    James, Nicholas
    Kinsella, Netty
    Lam, Thomas B. L.
    Lichty, Mark
    Loeb, Stacy
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Mastris, Ken
    Mitra, Anita V.
    Merriel, Samuel W. D.
    van der Kwast, Theodorus
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Palmer, Nynikka R.
    Paterson, Catherine C.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Segal, Phillip
    Schraidt, James A.
    Short, Camille E.
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Tempany, Clare M. C.
    Villers, Arnaud
    Wolinsky, Howard
    MacLennan, Steven
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (02): : 160 - 182
  • [26] Do researchers, clinicians, managers, and caregivers agree on the priorities for cancer caregiving research? A national and international online Delphi survey and meetings
    Lambert, Sylvie
    Ould-Brahim, Lydia
    Morrison, Marjorie
    Girgis, Afaf
    Yaffe, Mark
    Clayberg, Karissa
    Robinson, John
    Thorne, Sally
    Bottorff, Joan
    Duggleby, Wendy
    Campbell-Enns, Heather
    Kim, Youngmee
    Loiselle, Carmen
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 : 14 - 14
  • [28] Using a Modified Delphi Approach to Gain Consensus on Relevant Comparators in a Cost-Effectiveness Model: Application to Prostate Cancer Screening
    Keeney, Edna
    Thom, Howard
    Turner, Emma
    Martin, Richard M.
    Sanghera, Sabina
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (05) : 589 - 600
  • [29] Using a Modified Delphi Approach to Gain Consensus on Relevant Comparators in a Cost-Effectiveness Model: Application to Prostate Cancer Screening
    Edna Keeney
    Howard Thom
    Emma Turner
    Richard M. Martin
    Sabina Sanghera
    PharmacoEconomics, 2021, 39 : 589 - 600
  • [30] Management of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era: An Italian consensus through a Delphi approach
    Ceresoli, Giovanni Luca
    Rossi, Giulio
    Agustoni, Francesco
    Bonomi, Lucia
    Borghetti, Paolo
    Bulotta, Alessandra
    Casartelli, Clelia
    Cerea, Giulio
    Colonese, Francesca
    del Signore, Ester
    Finocchiaro, Giovanna
    Gianoncelli, Letizia
    Grisanti, Salvatore
    Maiolani, Martina
    Pagni, Fabio
    Proto, Claudia
    Rijavec, Erika
    Vittimberga, Isabella
    Arcangeli, Stefano
    Filippi, Andrea Riccardo
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 199