Does mandatory tax disclosure mitigate tax expense anomaly? Evidence from FIN 48

被引:1
|
作者
Song, Huimin [1 ]
Tao, Xuedan [1 ]
Wang, Huabing [2 ]
Zhang, Jinkang [3 ]
Zhang, Linlin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Nottingham Univ Business Sch China, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] West Texas A&M Univ, Paul & Virginia Engler Coll Business, Canyon, TX USA
[3] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Bengbu, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Res Ctr Cent & Eastern Europe, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Tax uncertainty; uncertainty Tax expense anomaly; FIN; 48; Uncertain tax benefits; Uncertain tax positions; Tax disclosure; INVESTOR SOPHISTICATION; EARNINGS; INCOME; RESERVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.frl.2023.104686
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Financial Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) mandates the disclosure of uncertain tax positions for U. S. public firms. Exploring its impact on market efficiency, we find a reduction in the tax expense anomaly as documented by Thomas and Zhang (2011) for affected firms. The effect is stronger for affected firms with higher disclosure quality, accuracy, and transient institutional shareholding, and it cannot be explained by increased analyst tax forecasts or decreased predictability of tax expenses for future profitability. Our findings suggest that the mandatory tax disclosure under FIN 48 encourages investors to assess the implications of tax information for stock prices.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does environmental information disclosure mitigate corporate risk? Evidence from China
    Chang, Yingying
    Du, Xingqiang
    Zeng, Quan
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2021, 17 (01)
  • [42] How does the structure of an interest expense cap change the tax benefits of debt?
    Bhanot, Karan
    Francois, Pascal
    Kadapakkam, Palani-Rajan
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2025, 91
  • [43] Do Firms Use Tax Reserves to Meet Analysts' Forecasts? Evidence from the Pre- and Post-FIN 48 Periods
    Gupta, Sanjay
    Laux, Rick C.
    Lynch, Daniel P.
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2016, 33 (03) : 1044 - 1074
  • [45] One Size Does Not Fit All: How the Uniform Rules of FIN 48 Affect the Relevance of Income Tax Accounting
    Robinson, Leslie A.
    Stomberg, Bridget
    Towery, Erin M.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2016, 91 (04): : 1195 - 1217
  • [46] The materiality of non-financial tax disclosure: Experimental evidence
    Goettsche, Max
    Habermann, Florian
    Sieber, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2024, 54
  • [47] Does Capital Bear the US Corporate Tax After All? New Evidence from Corporate Tax Returns
    Fox, Edward
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2020, 17 (01) : 71 - 115
  • [48] Does Tax Policy Change Affect Tax Avoidance Behaviour? Evidence from the Thin Capitalisation Rule in Indonesia
    Fitriantoro, Mohamad Jatiardi
    Abbas, Yulianti
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTING, 2024, 17 (02): : 145 - 168
  • [49] The Impact of Tax Awareness on Tax Compliance: Evidence from Vietnam
    Le, Thuy Nguyen Thi
    Hai, Yen Mac Thi
    Thi, Tran Cuong
    Hong, Minh Nguyen Thi
    JOURNAL OF TAX REFORM, 2024, 10 (02): : 214 - 227
  • [50] Does centralization of tax administration regulate tax competition? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Zhang, Haotian
    Lu, Shengfeng
    Chen, Sixia
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 84 : 1084 - 1098