The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, Shiyang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Tianying [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Clin Res Inst, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Renji Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Stat Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optimal allocation; Repeating baselines; Pre-post design; Analysis of covariance; Repeated measures; CALIBRATION; CHOICE; GEE;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-01893-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn pre-post designs, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a standard technique to detect the treatment effect with a continuous variable measured at baseline and follow-up. For measurements subject to a high degree of variability, it may be advisable to repeat the pre-treatment and/or follow-up assessments. In general, repeating the follow-up measurements is more advantageous than repeating the pre-treatment measurements, while the latter can still be valuable and improve efficiency in clinical trials.MethodsIn this article, we report investigations of using multiple pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements in randomized clinical trials. We consider the sample size formula for ANCOVA under general correlation structures with the pre-treatment mean included as the covariate and the mean follow-up value included as the response. We propose an optimal experimental design of multiple pre-post allocations under a specified constraint, that is, given the total number of pre-post treatment visits. The optimal number of the pre-treatment measurements is derived. For non-linear models, closed-form formulas for sample size/power calculations are generally unavailable, but we conduct Monte Carlo simulation studies instead.ResultsTheoretical formulas and simulation studies show the benefits of repeating the pre-treatment measurements in pre-post randomized studies. The optimal pre-post allocation derived from the ANCOVA extends well to binary measurements in simulation studies, using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE).ConclusionsRepeating baselines and follow-up assessments is a valuable and efficient technique in pre-post design. The proposed optimal pre-post allocation designs can minimize the sample size, i.e., achieve maximum power.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analyzing pre-post randomized studies with one post-randomization score using repeated measures and ANCOVA models
    Wan, Fei
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (10-11) : 2952 - 2974
  • [32] Optimizing treatment allocation in randomized clinical trials by leveraging baseline covariates
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Liu, Aiyi
    BIOMETRICS, 2023, 79 (04) : 2815 - 2829
  • [33] Randomized clinical trials with a pre- and a post-treatment measurement: Repeated measures versus ANCOVA models
    Winkens, Bjorn
    van Breukelen, Gerard J. P.
    Schouten, Hubert J. A.
    Berger, Martijn P. F.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (06) : 713 - 719
  • [34] Bayesian Optimal Phase II Design for Randomized Clinical Trials
    Zhao, Yujie
    Yang, Bo
    Lee, J. Jack
    Wang, Li
    Yuan, Ying
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (04): : 423 - 432
  • [35] Randomized clinical trials to identify optimal antibiotic treatment duration
    Horsburgh, C. Robert
    Shea, Kimberly M.
    Phillips, Patrick
    LaValley, Michael
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [36] Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Remains Far from Optimal
    Turner, J. Rick
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2018, 52 (02) : 137 - 139
  • [37] Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Remains Far from Optimal
    J. Rick Turner
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2018, 52 : 137 - 139
  • [38] Randomized clinical trials to identify optimal antibiotic treatment duration
    C Robert Horsburgh
    Kimberly M Shea
    Patrick Phillips
    Michael LaValley
    Trials, 14
  • [39] Measuring mental health outcomes with pre-post designs
    E. Warren Lambert
    Ann Doucette
    Leonard Bickman
    The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 2001, 28 : 273 - 286
  • [40] ISOASYMMETRY AND ANISOASYMMETRY TESTING IN PRE-POST RATING DESIGNS
    HEILMANN, WR
    LIENERT, GA
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 29 (01) : 65 - 69