The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, Shiyang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Tianying [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Clin Res Inst, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Renji Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Stat Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optimal allocation; Repeating baselines; Pre-post design; Analysis of covariance; Repeated measures; CALIBRATION; CHOICE; GEE;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-01893-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn pre-post designs, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a standard technique to detect the treatment effect with a continuous variable measured at baseline and follow-up. For measurements subject to a high degree of variability, it may be advisable to repeat the pre-treatment and/or follow-up assessments. In general, repeating the follow-up measurements is more advantageous than repeating the pre-treatment measurements, while the latter can still be valuable and improve efficiency in clinical trials.MethodsIn this article, we report investigations of using multiple pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements in randomized clinical trials. We consider the sample size formula for ANCOVA under general correlation structures with the pre-treatment mean included as the covariate and the mean follow-up value included as the response. We propose an optimal experimental design of multiple pre-post allocations under a specified constraint, that is, given the total number of pre-post treatment visits. The optimal number of the pre-treatment measurements is derived. For non-linear models, closed-form formulas for sample size/power calculations are generally unavailable, but we conduct Monte Carlo simulation studies instead.ResultsTheoretical formulas and simulation studies show the benefits of repeating the pre-treatment measurements in pre-post randomized studies. The optimal pre-post allocation derived from the ANCOVA extends well to binary measurements in simulation studies, using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE).ConclusionsRepeating baselines and follow-up assessments is a valuable and efficient technique in pre-post design. The proposed optimal pre-post allocation designs can minimize the sample size, i.e., achieve maximum power.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials
    Shiyang Ma
    Tianying Wang
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23
  • [2] Data management system for diabetes clinical trials: a pre-post evaluation study
    Nourani, Aynaz
    Ayatollahi, Haleh
    Solaymani-Dodaran, Masoud
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [3] Data management system for diabetes clinical trials: a pre-post evaluation study
    Aynaz Nourani
    Haleh Ayatollahi
    Masoud Solaymani-Dodaran
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [4] Optimal sample allocation in multisite randomized trials
    Shen, Zuchao
    Kelcey, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2022, 90 (03): : 693 - 711
  • [5] SAMPLE-SIZE ESTIMATION FOR RANDOMIZED PRE-POST DESIGNS
    OVERALL, JE
    STARBUCK, RR
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1979, 15 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [6] Single session pre-post randomized intervention studies: The good, bad, and ugly
    Gross, Anita
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2018, 38 : V - VII
  • [7] On recent advances in optimal allocation designs in clinical trials
    Sverdlov O.
    Rosenberger W.F.
    Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 2013, 7 (4) : 753 - 773
  • [8] Optimal Allocation of Sample Sizes to Multicenter Clinical Trials
    Lai, Dejian
    Chang, Kuang-Chao
    Rahbar, Mohammad H.
    Moye, Lemuel A.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2013, 23 (04) : 818 - 828
  • [9] Implementing optimal allocation in clinical trials with multiple endpoints
    Wang, Lu
    Chen, Yong
    Zhu, Hongjian
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2017, 182 : 88 - 99
  • [10] Optimal adaptive randomized designs for clinical trials
    Cheng, Yi
    Berry, Donald A.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2007, 94 (03) : 673 - 689