Consumers perceptions about the welfare of farm animals in Colombia

被引:1
|
作者
Garcia Castro, Fredy E. [1 ]
Medrano-Galarza, Catalina [2 ,3 ]
Cubides-Cardenas, Jaime A. [1 ]
Zuniga Lopez, Aldemar [1 ]
Ahumada-Beltran, Diego G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Corp Colombiana Invest Agr AGROSAVIA, Anim Hlth & Welf Res & Innovat Grp, Tibaitat Res Ctr, Cundinamarca, Colombia
[2] Fundacion Univ Colombia Uniagraria, Anim Sci Res Grp, Specializat Program Anim Welf & Ethol, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Univ Antonio Narino, Masters Program Anim Welf, Fac Vet Med, Bogota, Colombia
来源
AGRONOMIA MESOAMERICANA | 2023年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词
attitudes; domestic animals; opinions; society; ATTITUDES; CITIZENS;
D O I
10.15517/am.v34i1.50817
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Introduction. Research focused on listening and understanding public attitudes towards farm animal welfare is proliferating globally. Objective. To determine how consumers in Colombia perceive the welfare of farm animals and socio-demographic factors associated with such perceptions. Materials and methods. A descriptive and analytical epidemiological study was done through the implementation of a cross-sectional national online survey, conducted from September to October-2021, to obtain information on the knowledge and attitudes of consumers (>= 18 years) in Colombia regarding farm animal welfare, as well as socio-demographic characteristics (sex, age, education, occupation, location, growing-up environment, level of contact with livestock farms, and diet). Logistic and multinomial logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations of demographic factors with the level of importance given to animal welfare (AW), perceptions about needs, behavior, and sentience in farm animals, and perceptions about the state and promotion of AW in Colombia. Results. Responses from 798 participants were included in the analysis, 85.57 % saw AW as a concept that refers to how to treat animals and improve their quality of life. The level of importance given to AW was 9.78 +/- 0.85 (scale from 0 to 10) and was associated with words such as health, food, caring, respect, and comfort. Sex, age, education, level of contact with a farm, and growing-up in rural areas significantly influenced the opinions regarding the concept of AW and the promotion of farm animal welfare in Colombia. Conclusion. The participants showed concern about farm animal welfare. The differences found associated with the different socio-demographic factors can be used as a basis for formulating education and empowerment strategies that help modulate changes in the way animals are seen, and what welfare means and what it implies.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE WELFARE OF FARM-ANIMALS - AN ETHOLOGICAL APPROACH
    DUNCAN, IJH
    SCIENCE PROGRESS, 1987, 71 (283) : 317 - 326
  • [22] Assessing the welfare status of newborn farm animals
    Mellor, DJ
    Stafford, KJ
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2003, 12 (04) : 695 - 698
  • [23] EUROPEANS DEBATE WELFARE OF FARM-ANIMALS
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1979, 104 (17) : 377 - 379
  • [24] What do consumers think about farm animal welfare in modern agriculture? Attitudes and shopping behaviour
    Heise, Heinke
    Theuvsen, Ludwig
    INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 20 (03): : 379 - 399
  • [25] Attitudes of meat consumers in Mexico and Spain about farm animal welfare: A cross-cultural study
    Estevez-Moreno, Laura X.
    Maria, Gustavo A.
    Sepulveda, Wilmer S.
    Villarroel, Morris
    Miranda-de la Lama, Genaro C.
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2021, 173
  • [26] Welfare Monitoring Schemes: Using Research to Safeguard Welfare of Animals on the Farm
    Barnett, John L.
    Hemsworth, Paul H.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2009, 12 (02) : 114 - 131
  • [27] Stakeholder perceptions of primary school education about food sustainability and farm animal welfare in England
    Jones, Alice
    McCulloch, Steven P.
    Reiss, Michael J.
    RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [29] Animal welfare in husbandry, transport and slaughter of farm animals
    Troeger, K
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1996, 76 (12): : 1222 - &
  • [30] Welfare benefits to farm animals from their use in research
    Colditz, IG
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2004, 32 : 235 - 240