Life cycle assessment of paper products based on recycled and virgin fiber

被引:1
|
作者
Simamora, J. [1 ]
Wiloso, E. I. [2 ]
Yani, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] IPB Univ, Nat Resources & Environm Management Sci, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
[2] BRIN, Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Syst & Life Cycle Assess, Tangerang, Indonesia
[3] IPB Univ, Fac Agr Engn & Technol, Dept Agroindustrial Technol, POB 220, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
关键词
Global warming potential; Life cycle assessment; Paper product; Recycled fiber; Virgin fiber; WASTE MANAGEMENT; SOLID-WASTE; ISO; 14040; IMPACT; CONSUMPTION; METALS; SYSTEM; MATTER; PM2.5; WATER;
D O I
10.22034/gjesm.2023.09.SI.07
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Virgin wood fiber and recycled waste paper are the main raw materials for paper production. Virgin wood-fiber paper appears less favorable than recycled paper, as recycled paper generally consumes more natural resources. globalThis study presents a comparative life cycle assessment of paper production in Indonesia using wood fibers and recycled fiber materials. This life cycle assessment study aimed to compare two comparable products, namely duplex board with 93 percent recycled fiber and folding boxboard with 100 percent wood or virgin fiber raw materials. METHODS: Both products were represented as one metric ton of the final product. The study utilized a cradle-to-grave system and combined primary data from a paper factory in Indonesia with secondary data from the Ecoinvent database, representing processes in background systems. Various impact assessment methods were employed to evaluate the environmental impact, including the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the Centre for Environmental Studies, International Reference Life Cycle Data System, and the United Nations Environment Program, Society for Environmental Toxicology, and Chemistry toxicity model. All inventory and impact assessments were performed using SimaPro software. FINDINGS: The current study revealed that duplex board is environmentally preferable to folding boxboard across all the impact categories assessed. The results of the impact assessment of global warming potential fossil, acidification, particulates, fossil abiotic depletion, and human toxicity-cancer for duplex board were 1,848.26 kilogram carbon dioxide equivalent, 8.12 kilogram-sulfur-dioxide-equivalent, 2.12 kilogram particulate matter 2.5-equivalent, 14,668.06 megajoule, and 0.0000017 comparative toxic unit, while for folding boxboard 2,651.25 kilogram carbon-dioxide-equivalent, 13.95 kilogram sulfur-dioxide-equivalent, 3.27 kilogram particulate matter 2.5-equivalent, 22,395.81 mega-joule, and 0.0000021 comparative toxic unit, respectively. All impact magnitudes were measured in functional units per 1 ton of paper product. CONCLUSION: The study has revealed the environmental impact of paper products produced in Indonesia. Paper products made from recycled fibers are a more environmentally favorable option when than those produced from virgin fibers. Through further contribution analysis, it was determined that the main contributor to all impact categories in both production systems was fossilbased energy input. Efforts to improve the environmental performance of the two products should focus on enhancing the energy efficiency of the system and incorporating non-fossil fuel energy sources into the production process.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 106
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of woodfree printing paper life cycle inventory
    Katsura, Toru
    Niwata, Hiroaki
    Nakazawa, Katsuhito
    Katayama, Keiichi
    Sakamura, Hiroyasu
    Yasui, Itaru
    2000, JAPAN TAPPI, Tokyo, Japan (54): : 84 - 91
  • [22] Energy-based life cycle assessment of industrial products
    Bao, Han P.
    Multani, Harpreet S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2007, : 123 - +
  • [23] Life Cycle Assessment of Forest-Based Products: A Review
    Sahoo, Kamalakanta
    Bergman, Richard
    Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda
    Gu, Hongmei
    Liang, Shaobo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (17)
  • [24] A review of life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete
    Zhang, Yurong
    Luo, Wei
    Wang, Jingjing
    Wang, Yuanfeng
    Xu, Yaqin
    Xiao, Jianzhuang
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 209 : 115 - 125
  • [25] Life Cycle Assessment of Thermoactivated Recycled Cement Production
    Real, Sofia
    Sousa, Vitor
    Meireles, Ines
    Bogas, Jose Alexandre
    Carrico, Ana
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (19)
  • [26] Life cycle assessment of nickel products
    Mark Mistry
    Johannes Gediga
    Shannon Boonzaier
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 1559 - 1572
  • [27] Life cycle Sustainability assessment of products
    Kloepffer, Walter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of nickel products
    Mistry, Mark
    Gediga, Johannes
    Boonzaier, Shannon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (11): : 1559 - 1572
  • [29] PCB IN RECYCLED PAPER PRODUCTS
    WELLING, L
    PAUKKU, R
    MANTYKOSKI, K
    CHEMOSPHERE, 1992, 25 (03) : 293 - 295
  • [30] RECYCLED FIBER AND PAPER QUALITY
    不详
    SVENSK PAPPERSTIDNING-NORDISK CELLULOSA, 1994, 97 (02): : 74 - 74