WORKFLOW EFFICIENCIES FOR FLEXIBLE CYSTOSCOPY: COMPARING SINGLE-USE VS REUSABLE CYSTOSCOPES

被引：0
|
作者：
Haislip, I [1 ]
Rindorf, D. [2 ]
Cool, C. [3 ]
Tester, B. [4 ]
机构：
[1] Ambu USA, Columbia, MD USA
[2] Ambu AS, Ballerup 84, Denmark
[3] Ambu USA, New York, NY USA
[4] Reg Urol, Shreveport, LA USA
来源：
VALUE IN HEALTH | 2023年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
HSD40
引用
收藏
页码：S245 / S245
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single-use flexible bronchoscopes vs traditional reusable flexible bronchoscopes: a prospective controlled study
    He, Shuzhen
    Xie, Lihua
    Liu, Jianming
    Zou, Lijun
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [22] Are single-use flexible cystoscopes environmentally sustainable? A simplified lifecycle analysis
    Wombwell, Amy
    Holmes, Angela
    O'Kane, Dermot
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 27 - 28
  • [23] COMPARISON OF A NOVEL SINGLE-USE FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPE TO CURRENTLY EXISTING REUSABLE AND SINGLE-USE FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPES
    Wollin, Daniel
    Jiang, Ruiyang
    Radvak, Daniela
    Scales, Charles
    Ferrandino, Michael
    Simmons, W. Neal
    Preminger, Glenn
    Lipkin, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E666 - E666
  • [24] Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis
    Belkovsky, Mikhael
    Passerotti, Carlo Camargo
    Maia, Ronaldo Soares
    Artifon, Everson Luiz de Almeida
    Otoch, Jose Pinhata
    Da Cruz, Jose Arnaldo Shiomi
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 52 (01)
  • [25] Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system
    Kim, Jaehoon
    Gao, Bruce
    Bhojani, Naeem
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Chughtai, Bilal
    Elterman, Dean S.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (10): : 346 - 350
  • [26] Editorial Comment on "Institutional Micro-cost Comparative Analysis of Reusable vs Single-use Cystoscopes With Assessment of Environmental Footprint"
    Zampini, Anna M.
    UROLOGY, 2024, 188 : 77 - 77
  • [27] SINGLE-USE CYSTOSCOPES OFFERS FASTER TIME-TO-SCOPE WITH EQUIVALENT PERCEIVED FUNCTIONALITY VS REUSABLE SCOPES IN THE INPATIENT SETTING
    Hassig, Stephen
    Steidle, Matthew
    Ceraolo, Carl
    Fairbourn, Jason
    Zhu, Denzel
    Li, Ashley
    Chen, Galen
    Lim, Kelvin
    Wanderling, Christopher
    Saxton, Aaron
    Hines, Laena
    Hunt, Trevor
    Ninomiya, Mark
    Lee, Austin
    Jain, Rajat
    Quarrier, Scott O.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E562 - E562
  • [28] Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes-Letter by Rizan et al (2022): Clarification of Methods Due to Apparent Misinterpretation
    Hogan, Donnacha
    Hennessey, Derek B. B.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (10) : 1145 - 1146
  • [29] Cost comparison of reusable and single-use cystoscopes: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Birkedal, A. C. O.
    Mahmalji, W.
    Dehlholm-Lambertsen, E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S867 - S867
  • [30] Commentary on "Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis"
    Aizezi, Xierzhati
    Ge, Xue
    Wang, Zheng
    Ma, Yuan
    Li, Jifu
    Huang, Jinxing
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 52 (01)
12345