A mixed model approach to estimate the survivor average causal effect in cluster-randomized trials

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Tong, Guangyu [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hirani, Shashivadan P. [5 ]
Newman, Stanton P. [5 ,6 ]
Halpern, Scott D. [1 ,7 ]
Small, Dylan S. [8 ]
Li, Fan [3 ,4 ]
Harhay, Michael O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Palliat & Adv Illness Res PAIR Ctr, Perelman Sch Med, Clin Trials Methods & Outcomes Lab, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Methods Implementat & Prevent Sci, New Haven, CT USA
[5] City Univ London, Sch Hlth Sci, London, England
[6] UCL, Div Med, London, England
[7] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
causal inference; cluster-randomized trials; linear mixed models; expectation-maximization; potential outcomes; principal stratification; RECENT METHODOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; PRINCIPAL STRATIFICATION; POTENTIAL OUTCOMES; INFERENCE; IDENTIFICATION; LIKELIHOOD; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9939
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In many medical studies, the outcome measure (such as quality of life, QOL) for some study participants becomes informatively truncated (censored, missing, or unobserved) due to death or other forms of dropout, creating a nonignorable missing data problem. In such cases, the use of a composite outcome or imputation methods that fill in unmeasurable QOL values for those who died rely on strong and untestable assumptions and may be conceptually unappealing to certain stakeholders when estimating a treatment effect. The survivor average causal effect (SACE) is an alternative causal estimand that surmounts some of these issues. While principal stratification has been applied to estimate the SACE in individually randomized trials, methods for estimating the SACE in cluster-randomized trials are currently limited. To address this gap, we develop a mixed model approach along with an expectation-maximization algorithm to estimate the SACE in cluster-randomized trials. We model the continuous outcome measure with a random intercept to account for intracluster correlations due to cluster-level randomization, and model the principal strata membership both with and without a random intercept. In simulations, we compare the performance of our approaches with an existing fixed-effects approach to illustrate the importance of accounting for clustering in cluster-randomized trials. The methodology is then illustrated using a cluster-randomized trial of telecare and assistive technology on health-related QOL in the elderly.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 33
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ethical Issues in Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trials in Dialysis Facilities
    Goldstein, Cory E.
    Weijer, Charles
    Taljaard, Monica
    Al-Jaishi, Ahmed A.
    Basile, Erika
    Brehaut, Jamie
    Cook, Charles L.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Lacson, Eduardo, Jr.
    Lindsay, Craig
    Jardine, Meg
    Dember, Laura M.
    Garg, Amit X.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 74 (05) : 659 - 666
  • [32] Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials
    Brittney E. Bailey
    Rebecca Andridge
    Abigail B. Shoben
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [33] Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials
    Bailey, Brittney E.
    Andridge, Rebecca
    Shoben, Abigail B.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [34] Permutation tests for stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials
    Thompson, Jennifer
    Davey, Calum
    Hayes, Richard
    Hargreaves, James
    Fielding, Katherine
    STATA JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (04): : 803 - 819
  • [35] A mixed model formulation for designing cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes
    Braun, TM
    STATISTICAL MODELLING, 2003, 3 (03) : 233 - 249
  • [36] Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials
    Li, Peng
    Redden, David T.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [37] Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials
    Peng Li
    David T Redden
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15
  • [38] A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study (vol 19, 223, 2019)
    McGuinness, Myra B.
    Kasza, Jessica
    Karahalios, Amalia
    Guymer, Robyn H.
    Finger, Robert P.
    Simpson, Julie A.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Hierarchical Bayes Approach to Estimate the Treatment Effect for Randomized Controlled Trials
    Liang, Xinya
    Kamata, Akihito
    Li, Ji
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2020, 80 (06) : 1090 - 1114
  • [40] Survivor Average Causal Effects for Continuous Time: A Principal Stratification Approach to Causal Inference With Semicompeting Risks
    Comment, Leah
    Mealli, Fabrizia
    Haneuse, Sebastien
    Zigler, Corwin M.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 67 (02)