Comparative Cost Analysis Between Endoscopic Resection and Surgery for Submucosal Colorectal Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Noh, Soo Min [1 ]
Hwang, Sung Wook [1 ]
Park, Sang Hyoung [1 ]
Yang, Dong-Hoon [1 ]
Ye, Byong Duk [1 ]
Park, In Ja [2 ]
Lim, Seok-Byung [2 ]
Byeon, Jeong-Sik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, 88,Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Colorectal surgery; Cost; Endoscopy; Gastrointestinal; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; MUCOSAL RESECTION; JAPANESE SOCIETY; INVASION DEPTH; COLON; DISSECTION; MAGNIFICATION; MICROSURGERY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000002220
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: There are few studies analyzing the cost of endoscopic resection and surgical resection in the treatment of submucosal colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to perform a detailed cost analysis of endoscopic resection and surgical resection for submucosal colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Medical records of 484 patients with submucosal colorectal cancer who underwent endoscopic resection or surgical resection between July 2003 and July 2015 were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The total costs during index admission and follow-up as well as clinical outcomes between the 2 groups were compared in the whole cohort and propensity score-matched cohort. RESULTS: In the propensity score-matched analysis (n = 155 in each group), the endoscopic resection and surgical resection groups did not show significant differences in the rates of procedure-related adverse events (6.5% vs 3.9%; p = 0.304) and recurrence (0.6% vs 1.3%; p > 0.99). Readmission was more common in the endoscopic resection group (40.6% vs 11.0%; p < 0.001) because 64 (41.3%) patients underwent additional surgery for endoscopic noncurative resection. The endoscopic resection group had a lower cost during the index admission (1335.6 vs 6698.4 USD; p < 0.001), whereas the surgical resection group had a lower cost during follow-up (2488.7 vs 5035.7 USD; p < 0.001). The total cumulative cost was lower in the endoscopic resection group (6371.3 vs 9187.1 USD; p < 0.001). The same trend was observed in the whole cohort without propensity score matching. LIMITATIONS: A limitation of this study was the retrospective nature of analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The total cumulative cost for treatment and follow-up for submucosal colorectal cancer was lower in the endoscopic resection group, which had comparable oncologic outcomes as the surgical resection group. Endoscopic resection can be considered a cost-effective option for initial treatment for submucosal colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 732
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Surgery or Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Metachronous Early Gastric Cancer: a Meta-analysis
    Meng, Zhao Wu
    Bishay, Kirles
    Vaska, Marcus
    Ruan, Yibing
    Al-Haddad, Mohammad A.
    Elhanafi, Sherif E.
    Qumseya, Bashar J.
    Belletrutti, Paul J.
    Gill, Richdeep
    Debru, Estifanos
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Brenner, Darren R.
    Forbes, Nauzer
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (11) : 2628 - 2639
  • [22] Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Surgery or Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Metachronous Early Gastric Cancer: a Meta-analysis
    Zhao Wu Meng
    Kirles Bishay
    Marcus Vaska
    Yibing Ruan
    Mohammad A. Al-Haddad
    Sherif E. Elhanafi
    Bashar J. Qumseya
    Paul J. Belletrutti
    Richdeep Gill
    Estifanos Debru
    Steven J. Heitman
    Darren R. Brenner
    Nauzer Forbes
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023, 27 : 2628 - 2639
  • [23] Endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection) for early gastric cancer
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Jung, Hwoon-Yong
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 25 : 55 - 63
  • [24] Outcome of endoscopic resection for submucosal colorectal cancer based on the overall survival and tumor recurrence
    Yoshino, T
    Sano, Y
    Fu, KI
    Saito, Y
    Matsuda, N
    Akino, K
    Maeda, N
    Kato, S
    Fujii, T
    Yoshida, S
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (05) : AB161 - AB161
  • [25] Long-Term Outcomes After Endoscopic Resection for Submucosal Invasive Colorectal Cancer
    Yoda, Yusuke
    Ikematsu, Hiroaki
    Fujii, Takahiro
    Tsunoda, Chihiro
    Saraya, Tsutomu
    Oono, Yasuhiro
    Kojima, Takashi
    Minashi, Keiko
    Yano, Tomonori
    Kaneko, Kazuhiro
    Ohtsu, Atsushi
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB340 - AB340
  • [26] Wide-Field Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Laterally Spreading Colorectal Lesions: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Bahin, Farzan F.
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Rasouli, Khalid N.
    Lee, Eric Y.
    Williams, Stephen J.
    Bourke, Michael J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB42 - AB43
  • [27] Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Bahin, Farzan F.
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Bourke, Michael J.
    GUT, 2019, 68 (06) : 1130 - 1130
  • [28] Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Bahin, Farzan F.
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Rasouli, Khalid N.
    Mahajan, Hema
    McLeod, Duncan
    Lee, Eric Y. T.
    Williams, Stephen J.
    Bourke, Michael J.
    GUT, 2018, 67 (11) : 1965 - 1973
  • [29] The need for supplementary surgery after endoscopic treatment of colorectal neoplasms: comparing endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection Response
    Maple, John T.
    Banerjee, Subhas
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (06) : 1299 - 1300
  • [30] Cost analysis and outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in an outpatient setting
    Maselli, Roberta
    Galtieri, Piera Alessia
    Di Leo, Milena
    Ferrara, Elisa Chiara
    Anderloni, Andrea
    Carrara, Silvia
    Vanni, Elena
    Mangiavillano, Benedetto
    Genco, Alfredo
    Al Awadhi, Sameer
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Hassan, Cesare
    Repici, Alessandro
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2019, 51 (03) : 391 - 396