Risk assessment methods for process safety, process security and resilience in the chemical process industry: A thorough literature review

被引:8
|
作者
Rahim, Muhammad Shah Ab [1 ,2 ]
Reniers, Genserik [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Ming [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Bajpai, Shailendra [7 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Safety & Secur Sci Sect, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
[2] Minist Human Resources, Govt Adm Ctr, Dept Occupat Safety & Hlth Malaysia, Putrajaya 62530, Malaysia
[3] Univ Antwerp, Fac Appl Econ, Antwerp Res Grp Safety & Secur ARGoSS, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[4] CEDON, KU Leuven, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Inst Future Energy, Ctr Hydrogen Energy, Johor Baharu 81310, Malaysia
[6] Univ Tasmania, Australia Maritime Coll, Natl Ctr Maritime Engn & Hydrodynam, Launceston, Tas, Australia
[7] Dept Chem Engn, Dr BR Ambedkar Natl Inst Technol, Jalandhar, Punjab, India
关键词
Chemical process industry; Process safety; Process security; Resilience; Risk assessment; Sociotechnical systems; RESONANCE ANALYSIS METHOD; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; PROTECTION ANALYSIS; HUMAN-PERFORMANCE; PROCESS SYSTEM; HAZOP; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; EVENTS; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105274
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This paper presents a systematic literature review of risk assessment methods in the chemical process industry (CPI), focusing on process safety, process security, and resilience. We analyzed peer-reviewed articles from 2000 to 2022 using the PRISMA methodology and identified twelve predominant methods. Our findings reveal a shift towards dynamic, systemic-based assessments like the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) and System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP). These methods are particularly effective at capturing the complexities of sociotechnical systems in the CPI. However, a significant observation from our review is the limited emphasis on the resilience paradigm within many existing methods when addressing both process safety and process security risks, which is crucial for preventing and recovering from disruptions. Given the evolving challenges in system safety and security threats, there is an urgent need for holistic methods that integrate process safety, process security, and resilience. Our review highlights the opportunity for further research to better prepare the industry for future challenges, ensuring safer, more secure, reliable, and resilient operations.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Review of Multiscale Methods for Process Monitoring, With an Emphasis on Applications in Chemical Process Systems
    Nawaz, Muhammad
    Maulud, Abdulhalim Shah
    Zabiri, Haslinda
    Suleman, Humbul
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 49708 - 49724
  • [42] Safety risk assessment of chemical production process based on local and global objectives
    Shao R.
    Pan H.
    Huang J.
    Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2022, 79
  • [43] Human factors assessment technique for the chemical process industry
    Kariuki, Simon Gitahi
    Vadillo, Elena Mayor
    Loewe, Katharina
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 30 (10) : 1319 - 1327
  • [44] Parsing the chemical risk assessment process for the laboratory
    Stuart, Ralph
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [45] Quantitative Risk Assessment for Chemical Process Industries
    Li Qiujin
    Xia Xin
    Li Zhuxia
    Zhang Shengzhu
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK AND RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2010, : 91 - +
  • [46] A bibliometric review of process safety and risk analysis
    Amin, Md Tanjin
    Khan, Faisal
    Amyotte, Paul
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 126 : 366 - 381
  • [47] University industry collaboration process: a systematic review of literature
    Passos, Joana Baleeiro
    Enrique, Daisy Valle
    Dutra, Camila Costa
    ten Caten, Carla Schwengber
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03) : 479 - 506
  • [48] Sales and operations planning in the process industry: A literature review
    Noroozi, Sayeh
    Wikner, Joakim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 188 : 139 - 155
  • [49] IMPROVING RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR PROCESS PLANT
    COX, RA
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1982, 6 (03) : 249 - 260
  • [50] APPLICATION OF RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN THE CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRY
    Hussin, N. E.
    Kidam, K.
    Jalani, Jihan J.
    Johari, A.
    Hashim, H.
    Hassim, Mimi H.
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 75 (06): : 127 - 135