A Dissection of the Inter-Model Spread of the Aerosol Direct Radiative Effect in CMIP6 Models

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Qiurun [1 ]
Huang, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
aerosol direct radiative effect; CMIP6; inter-model differences; radiative transfer; aerosol-surface multi-scattering; aerosol optical depth; ATMOSPHERE MODEL; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1029/2023GL105112
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The all-sky Aerosol Direct Radiative Effect (ADRE) varies considerably among global climate models (GCMs), which results from differences in aerosol and atmospheric states and ADRE sensitivity to aerosol-related radiative processes. This study uses a regression method to analyze the inter-model spread of ADRE among the GCMs of the Sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIP6). The key state variables examined include scattering and absorbing aerosol optical depth, surface albedo, and shortwave cloud radiative effect. We find that differences in state variables and radiative sensitivity explain 67% and 17%, respectively, of the global ADRE anomaly. The ADRE anomaly in different models is dominated by different factors, which sometimes leads to compensating effects. For the global mean ADRE anomaly, aerosol optical depth differences dominate in CNRM-ESM2-1 and GFDL-ESM4 models, while ADRE sensitivity variations to aerosol-only scattering effect dominate in HadGEM3-GC31-LL, MPI-ESM-1-2-HAM, and MRI-ESM2-0 models. Aerosols scatter and absorb solar radiation, impacting the Earth's climate. Global climate models differ in their quantification of this effect. The differences in quantification arise from different state variables, including the aerosol properties and atmospheric conditions. Additionally, the radiative sensitivity of aerosol effect to aerosol-related physical processes varies with models. In this study, we identify the primary causes of the differences in aerosol radiative effect among climate models and quantify their respective impacts by using a regression method. We find that besides the aerosol optical depth, whose influence on aerosol radiative effect is well recognized, the radiative sensitivity of aerosol and surface interactions significantly contributes to the aerosol radiative effect differences in the latest climate models. A regression model is used to dissect the inter-model spread of the all-sky Aerosol Direct Radiative Effect (ADRE) in Sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects ModelsThe model explains 86% of ADRE inter-model spread, with variances in state-variable and radiative sensitivity contributing 67% and 17% eachDifferences in aerosol optical depth and ADRE sensitivity to aerosol-surface interactions drive the spatial variance in global ADRE spread
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anthropogenic aerosol impacts on Pacific Coast precipitation in CMIP6 models
    Allen, Robert J.
    Zhao, Xueying
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH-CLIMATE, 2022, 1 (01):
  • [32] Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6
    Forster, Piers M.
    Richardson, Thomas
    Maycock, Amanda C.
    Smith, Christopher J.
    Samset, Bjorn H.
    Myhre, Gunnar
    Andrews, Timothy
    Pincus, Robert
    Schulz, Michael
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (20) : 12460 - 12475
  • [33] Aerosol characteristics in CMIP6 models' global simulations and their evaluation with the satellite measurements
    Bharath, Jaisankar
    Kumar, Tumuluru Venkata Lakshmi
    Salgueiro, Vanda
    Costa, Maria Joao
    Mall, Rajesh Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01) : 217 - 236
  • [34] The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6
    Pincus, Robert
    Forster, Piers M.
    Stevens, Bjorn
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 9 (09) : 3447 - 3460
  • [35] CMIP6 Models Underestimate the Holton-Tan Effect
    Elsbury, Dillon
    Peings, Yannick
    Magnusdottir, Gudrun
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (24)
  • [36] Trends in AOD, Clouds, and Cloud Radiative Effects in Satellite Data and CMIP5 and CMIP6 Model Simulations Over Aerosol Source Regions
    Cherian, Ribu
    Quaas, Johannes
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (09)
  • [37] Historical Changes of Black Carbon in Snow and Its Radiative Forcing in CMIP6 Models
    Chen, Yang
    Li, Xuejing
    Xing, Yuxuan
    Yan, Shirui
    Wu, Dongyou
    Shi, Tenglong
    Cui, Jiecan
    Zhang, Xueying
    Niu, Xiaoying
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (11)
  • [38] Historical Changes and Reasons for Model Differences in Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing in CMIP6
    Fiedler S.
    van Noije T.
    Smith C.J.
    Boucher O.
    Dufresne J.-L.
    Kirkevåg A.
    Olivié D.
    Pinto R.
    Reerink T.
    Sima A.
    Schulz M.
    Geophysical Research Letters, 2023, 50 (15)
  • [39] Publisher Correction: The trend and spatial spread of multisectoral climate extremes in CMIP6 models
    Oluwafemi E. Adeyeri
    Wen Zhou
    Xuan Wang
    Ruhua Zhang
    Patrick Laux
    Kazeem A. Ishola
    Muhammad Usman
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [40] Compensation Between Cloud Feedback and Aerosol-Cloud Interaction in CMIP6 Models
    Wang, Chenggong
    Soden, Brian J.
    Yang, Wenchang
    Vecchi, Gabriel A.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (04)