An evaluation of detailed animal characteristics influencing the lactation production efficiency of spring-calving, pasture-based dairy cattle

被引:3
|
作者
Evers, S. H. [1 ,2 ]
Delaby, L. [3 ]
Pierce, K. M. [2 ]
McCarthy, B. [1 ]
Coffey, E. L. [1 ]
Horan, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Teagasc Moorepk, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Fermoy P61C996, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
[3] INRAE, Inst Agro Physiol Environm & Genet Anim & Syst El, F-35590 St Gilles, France
关键词
feed efficiency; animal intake; dairy cow; DRY-MATTER INTAKE; BODY CONDITION SCORE; RESIDUAL FEED-INTAKE; MILK-PRODUCTION; STOCKING RATE; ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS; ENERGY-BALANCE; HOLSTEIN; COWS; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2022-21815
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Selection for feed efficiency, the ratio of output (e.g., milk yield) to feed intake, has traditionally been limited on commercial dairy farms by the necessity for detailed individual animal intake and performance data within large animal populations. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the effects of individual animal characteristics (animal breed, genetic potential, milk production, body weight (BW), daily total dry matter intake (TDMI), and energy balance) on a cost-effective production efficiency parameter calculated as the annual fat and protein (milk solids) production per unit of mid-lactation BW (MSperBWlact). A total of 1,788 individual animal intake records measured at various stages of lactation (early, mid, and late lactation) from 207 Holstein-Friesian and 200 Jersey x HolsteinFriesian cows were used. The derived efficiency traits included daily kilograms of milk solids produced per 100 kg of BW (dMSperBW(int)) and daily kilograms of milk solids produced per kilogram of TDMI (dMSperTDMI). The TDMI per 100 kg of BW was also calculated (TDMI/BWint) at each stage of lactation. Animals were subsequently either ranked as the top 25% (Heff) or bottom 25% (Leff) based on their lactation production efficiency (MSperBW(lact)). Dairy cow breed significantly affected animal characteristics over the entire lactation and during specific periods of intake measurements. Jersey crossbred animals produced more milk, based on a lower TDMI, and achieved an increased intake per kilogram of BW. Similarly, Heff produced more milk over longer lactations, weighed less, were older, and achieved a higher TDMI compared with the Leff animals. Both Jersey x Holstein-Friesian and Heff cows achieved superior production efficiency due to lower maintenance energy requirements, and consequentially increased milk solids production per kilogram of BW and per kilogram of TDMI at all stages of lactation. Indeed, within breed, Heff animals weighed 20 kg less and produced 15% more milk solids over the total lactation than Leff. In addition, Heff achieved increased daily milk solids yield (+0.16 kg) and milk solids yield per kilogram of TDMI (+ 0.23 kg/kg DM) during intake measurement periods. Moreover, the strong and consistently positive correlations between MSperBW(lact) and detailed production efficiency traits (dMSperBW(int), dMSperTDMI) reported here demonstrate that MSperBW(lact) is a robust measure that can be applied within commercial grazing dairy systems to increase the selection intensity for highly efficient animals.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1109
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effect of 3 autumn pasture management strategies applied to 2 farm system intensities on the productivity of spring-calving, pasture-based dairy systems
    Evers, S. H.
    Delaby, L.
    Fleming, C.
    Pierce, K. M.
    Horan, B.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (06) : 6803 - 6819
  • [12] Effects of grass pasture and concentrate-based feeding systems for spring-calving dairy cows in early spring on performance during lactation
    Kennedy, E
    O'Donovan, M
    Murphy, JP
    Delaby, L
    O'Mara, F
    GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (03) : 310 - 318
  • [13] Effects of increased grazing intensity during the early and late grazing periods on the welfare of spring-calving, pasture-based dairy cows
    Crossley, R. E.
    Bokkers, E. A. M.
    O'Driscoll, K.
    Kennedy, E.
    Conneely, M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (09) : 6427 - 6443
  • [14] Production, reproduction, and health of Holstein, Jersey, and crossbred cattle in a seasonal calving pasture-based dairy.
    Mullen, K. A. E.
    Washburn, S. P.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 179 - 179
  • [15] Risk factors associated with indicators of dairy cow welfare during the housing period in Irish, spring-calving, hybrid pasture-based systems
    Crossley, R. E.
    Bokkers, E. A. M.
    Browne, N.
    Sugrue, K.
    Kennedy, E.
    Conneely, M.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2022, 208
  • [16] Effects of climate and farm management practices on bovine digital dermatitis in spring-calving pasture-based dairy farms in Taranaki, New Zealand
    Yang, D. A.
    Laven, R. A.
    Chesterton, R. N.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2019, 247 : 75 - 80
  • [17] Evaluation of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in seasonal calving pasture-based dairy production systems
    Herlihy, M. M.
    Berry, D. P.
    Crowe, M. A.
    Diskin, M. G.
    Butler, S. T.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (09) : 4488 - 4501
  • [18] Intake profile, milk production, and energy balance of early-lactation spring-calving Holstein Friesian and Jersey x Holstein Friesian dairy cows in high-utilization pasture-based systems
    Walsh, S.
    Delaby, L.
    Kennedy, M.
    Galvin, N.
    McKay, Z. C.
    Egan, M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (10) : 8058 - 8071
  • [19] Evaluation of lactation models in pasture-based dairy ewes in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Salamon, Dragica
    Batinic, Vinko
    Ivankovic, Stanko
    Antunac, Neven
    Dzidic, Alen
    MLJEKARSTVO, 2020, 70 (04): : 275 - 283
  • [20] Effects of concentrate supplementation and genotype on milk production and nitrogen utilisation efficiency in late-lactation, spring-calving grazing dairy cows
    Doran, M. J.
    Mulligan, F. J.
    Lynch, M. B.
    Fahey, A. G.
    Rajauria, G.
    Brady, E. L.
    Pierce, K. M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2022, 261