Assessing the progress and spatial patterns of sustainable eco-environmental development based on the 2030 Agenda for SDGs in China

被引:3
|
作者
Wei, Dongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wanting [1 ]
Yang, Wentao [3 ]
Chen, Hao [4 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ Forestry & Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Nat Resources Affairs Ctr, Hunan Key Lab Remote Sensing Monitoring Ecol Envir, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Natl local Joint Engn Lab Geospatial Informat Tech, 1 Taoyuan Rd, Xiangtan, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Local Sustainable Dev Goals, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Eco-environment; sustainable development; 2030; agenda; spatial statistics; spatial patterns; POLLUTION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2022.2155265
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The eco-environment is fundamental for human survival and development. To gain insight into Chinese eco-environmental challenges, a scientific and quantifying assessment of sustainable eco-environmental development (SED) is essential and can guide policy development and implementation. However, systematic methods for assessing progress towards achieving SED are lacking based on the 2030 Agenda for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Therefore, we developed a systematic method to quantify SED progress at the provincial level in China. In the proposed method, the SED indicator framework was developed to align with the global indicator framework (GIF), adopting clear statistical definitions for each indicator and the criteria of data selection at provincial levels in China. A four-level method of identifying the upper and lower bounds of the indicator values was proposed to normalise them to a standard scale of 0-100. The SED index and three composite indices were aggregated by the arithmetic means of the individual scores for assessing overall SED progress. A spatial autocorrelation analysis was used to explore the spatial patterns of the SED index scores. The results showed that all provinces except Shandong and Hebei had relatively good performances in achieving SED. Most provinces performed better in terms of the water area eco-environment than they do in terms of the air and terrestrial eco-environments. In addition, some provinces showed a positive spatial autocorrelation pattern on the SED index scores, and the high-value (low-value) aggregation regions were mainly concentrated in Western (East) China. These results provide a richer understanding of the challenges for SED faced by each province in China.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 401
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spatial analysis of China's eco-environmental quality: 1990-2010
    Sun Dongqi
    Zhang Jingxiang
    Hu Yi
    Jiang Jinliang
    Zhou Liang
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 23 (04) : 695 - 709
  • [22] Exploration on the coordinated development of urbanization and the eco-environmental system in central China
    Zheng, Han
    Khan, Yousaf Ali
    Abbas, Syed Zaheer
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 204
  • [23] An integrated sustainable development approach to modeling the eco-environmental effects from urbanization
    Liu, Yaobin
    Yao, Chengsheng
    Wang, Guixin
    Bao, Shuming
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2011, 11 (06) : 1599 - 1608
  • [24] Assessment of coastal eco-environmental sustainable development under multiple pressures: A case study of Jiaozhou Bay, China
    Wan, Liu
    Wang, Xiao Hua
    Wu, Wen
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 363
  • [25] Eco-environmental spatial characteristics of Fildes Peninsula based on TuPu models
    PANG Xiaoping 1
    2 Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping
    Advances in Polar Science, 2012, 23 (03) : 155 - 162
  • [26] The impact of eco-environmental regulation on green energy efficiency in China-Based on spatial economic analysis
    Wu, Mingran
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 34 (04) : 971 - 988
  • [27] Progress report of research on eco-environmental evolution, control and adjustment for and land in Western China
    Pan, XL
    Gao, W
    Ma, YJ
    Zhang, J
    Lu, QF
    Lv, GH
    Li, WQ
    Shi, QD
    ECOSYSTEMS' DYNAMICS, AGRICULTURAL REMOTE SENSING AND MODELING, AND SITE-SPECIFIC AGRICULTURE, 2003, 5153 : 245 - 263
  • [28] Assessing regional progress toward the sustainable development goals (SDGs): Whither the Caribbean?
    Russell, Suzana N.
    Rao-Graham, Lila
    Mcnaughton, Maurice
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [29] Is the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) index an adequate framework to measure the progress of the 2030 Agenda?
    Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, Jose
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Castro-Fresno, Daniel
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 26 (06) : 663 - 671
  • [30] Mechanism of Urban Spatial Morphology and Eco-Environmental Risk: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China
    Yang, Yijia
    Feng, Zhaoyu
    Zhu, Xuexin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 19 (02)