Research on the impact of fiscal environmental protection expenditure on agricultural carbon emissions

被引:2
|
作者
Wu, Saijun [1 ]
Chen, Xueqing [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Inst Technol, Business Sch, Hengyang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
fiscal environmental protection expenditure; agricultural carbon emissions; policy research; China; greenhouse effect; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; REGULATIONS; ADOPTION; BENEFIT; WATER; SOIL;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2023.1252787
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China's agricultural and rural greenhouse gas emissions account for about 15% of its total emissions. Studying how to reduce China's agricultural carbon emissions (ACEs) is of great strategic significance. Based on the panel data of 31 provinces (cities) in China from 2007 to 2020, this paper empirically tests the impact of fiscal environmental protection expenditure (FEPE) on ACEs. The results reveal that: FEPE has significant negative impacts on ACEs; FEPE has a heterogeneous impact on ACEs in different regions, which shows that it has a significant impact on the eastern and central regions and provinces with relatively "high" carbon emissions, while it has no significant impact on the western regions and provinces with relatively "low" carbon emissions; Further the results of mechanism analysis show that the impact of FEPE on ACEs is mainly manifested in its inhibiting effect on agricultural diesel, fertilizer and film use of carbon emissions. In light of these findings, it is imperative for the government to ensure steady and substantial investments in environmental protection. Moreover, implementing region-specific measures is essential to effectively curbing ACEs. The findings of this study offer invaluable insights that can guide the formulation of policies aimed at effectively reducing ACEs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of environmental fiscal reforms on carbon emissions of EURO-4 countries: CS-NARDL approach
    Mehta D.
    Derbeneva V.
    International Journal of Thermofluids, 2024, 21
  • [22] Driving effect of government environmental protection expenditure on green technology from the perspective of fiscal transparency
    Chao Zhou
    Min Li
    Yunting Zhao
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12 (1):
  • [23] Impact of structure and organization of smallholders on agricultural carbon emissions
    Yi, Yujie
    Gu, Chuan
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [24] The Path to Green Development: The Impact of a Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme on Enterprises' Environmental Protection Investments
    Lv, Shigong
    Lv, Yanying
    Gao, Da
    Liu, Lulu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [25] Carbon emissions, environmental distortions, and impact on growth
    Choudhury, Tonmoy
    Kayani, Umar Nawaz
    Gul, Azeem
    Haider, Syed Arslan
    Ahmad, Sareer
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 126
  • [26] The impact of environmental innovation on carbon dioxide emissions
    Toebelmann, Daniel
    Wendler, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 244
  • [27] Corporate Expenditure on Environmental Protection
    Haller, Stefanie A.
    Murphy, Liam
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 51 (02): : 277 - 296
  • [28] Corporate Expenditure on Environmental Protection
    Stefanie A. Haller
    Liam Murphy
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2012, 51 : 277 - 296
  • [29] The impact of fiscal support for agricultural expenditure on rural residents' consumption: from a perspective of level and structure
    Hu, Yuanhong
    Huang, Feifei
    Liu, Pengling
    Zhang, Shuyu
    KYBERNETES, 2025, 54 (03) : 1877 - 1903
  • [30] Does fiscal expenditure matter for agricultural development? Examining the impact of technological progress on food production
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    Akram, Waqar
    Usman, Muhammad
    Nasereldin, Yasir A.
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2024, 28 (04) : 1774 - 1802