Electron beam weld penetration depth prediction improved by beam characterisation

被引:1
|
作者
Yin, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Kennedy, Andrew [1 ]
Mitchell, Tim [3 ]
Sieczkiewicz, Norbert [1 ,2 ]
Jefimovs, Vitalijs [3 ]
Tian, Yingtao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Engn, Lancaster LA1 4YW, Lancs, England
[2] Natl Struct Integr Res Ctr NSIRC, Granta Pk,Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6AL, Cambs, England
[3] TWI Ltd, Granta Pk,Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6AL, Cambs, England
关键词
Electron beam welding; Electron beam probing; Artificial neural network; Penetration depth prediction; POWER-DENSITY DISTRIBUTION; OPTIMIZATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-022-10682-6
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Predicting the penetration depth during electron beam welding (EBW) is important, but the accuracy of current predictive models is highly varied, depending on the type and number of data used. This paper develops and compares several penetration depth prediction models for EBW and uniquely compares the influence of the number and type of data used, as well as the measurement and modelling methods. Although accelerating voltage, beam current and welding speed data are essential modelling inputs, additional data for beam focal position and beam shape, measured using a novel 4-slit beam probing method, greatly improve the accuracy of predictions for models based on an empirical equation, a second-order regression and an artificial neural network (ANN). Optimised models predict weld depths that deviate, on average, by less than 5% from measured depths, are valid for very broad linear electron beam power density ranges (86-324 J/mm) and are close to the estimated 4% inherent variability in the process and its measurement. Within this linear electron beam power density range, the ANN yields accurate and reliable depth predictions, demanding as few as 36 welding trials, decreasing the number required for models that do not consider beam focal position and shape, for the same targeted accuracy, by more than 60%. Adding large volumes of virtual data generated by less reliable analytical or regression models did not improve the predictive capability for the ANN developed in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 415
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of Electron Beam Welding Penetration Depth Using Machine Learning-Enhanced Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling
    Yin, Yi
    Tian, Yingtao
    Ding, Jialuo
    Mitchell, Tim
    Qin, Jian
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (21)
  • [32] EFFECT OF BEAM PARAMETERS ON PENETRATION IN ELECTRON-BEAM WELDING
    DUMONTE, P
    SAYEGH, G
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1974, 121 (03) : C107 - C107
  • [33] PENETRATION VARIATIONS IN ELECTRON BEAM WELDING
    HICKEN, GK
    BOOCO, WG
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1968, 115 (03) : C76 - &
  • [34] ELECTRON-BEAM PENETRATION IN GAAS
    MARTINELLI, RU
    WANG, CC
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1973, 44 (07) : 3350 - 3351
  • [35] Characterization of a Radiofluorogenic Polymer for Low-Energy Electron Beam Penetration Depth Visualization
    Skowyra, Magdalena Maria
    Ankjaergaard, Christina
    Yu, Liyun
    Lindvold, Lars Rene
    Skov, Anne Ladegaard
    Miller, Arne
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [36] ELECTRON BEAM WELD THICK TITANIUM PARTS
    MCGREGOR, WP
    NELSON, FC
    MACHINERY, 1968, 74 (12): : 80 - &
  • [38] Prediction of electron beam weld quality from weld bead surface using clustering and support vector regression
    Jaypuria, Sanjib
    Bondada, Venkatasainath
    Gupta, Santosh Kumar
    Pratihar, Dilip Kumar
    Chakrabarti, Debalay
    Jha, M. N.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 211
  • [39] Online control of penetration depth in laser beam welding
    Kaierle, S
    Beersiek, J
    Kreutz, EW
    Poprawe, R
    Gunnewig, J
    Rake, H
    IECON '98 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 1694 - 1698
  • [40] Penetration depth of laser Doppler flowmetry beam in teeth
    Polat, S
    Er, K
    Polat, NT
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2005, 100 (01): : 125 - 129