Ethical considerations for telemedical delivery of fertility care: an Ethics Committee opinion

被引:0
|
作者
Klipstein, Sigal [1 ]
Anderson, Deborah [1 ]
Azziz, Ricardo [1 ]
Arora, Kavita Shah [1 ]
Bakare, Tolulope [1 ]
Cameron, Katherine [1 ]
Crockin, Susan [1 ]
Farrell, Ruth [1 ]
Ginsburg, Elizabeth [1 ]
Hammack-Aviran, Catherine [1 ]
Katz-Jaffe, Mandy [1 ]
Kawwass, Jennifer [1 ]
Martinez, Edward [1 ]
Morris, Joshua [1 ]
Racowsky, Catherine [1 ]
Rebar, Robert [1 ]
Reshef, Eli [1 ]
Samplaski, Mary [1 ]
Shannon, Chevis N. [1 ]
Taylor, Hugh [1 ]
Tipton, Sean [1 ]
Westphal, Lynn [1 ]
Zweifel, Julianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Soc Reprod Med, Washington, DC 20003 USA
关键词
Ethics; assisted reproduction; telehealth; telemedicine; digital healthcare;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Telemedicine has the potential to increase access to and decrease the cost of care. However, it also alters the nature of the physicianpatient relationship and the interaction of patients with the healthcare system, which may limit access to care in some circumstances. Regardless of the modality of care delivery, the basic tenets of medical ethics and the obligations of physicians to their patients still hold. (Fertil Steril (R) 2024;121:434-8. (c) 2024 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 438
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [43] Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion
    Klipstein, Sigal
    Hammack-Aviran, Catherine
    Racowsky, Catherine
    Shannon, Chevis
    Shalowitz, David
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth
    Kawwass, Jennifer
    Davis, Joseph
    Zweifel, Julianne
    Cameron, Katherine
    Westphal, Lynn
    Katz-Jaffe, Mandy
    Samplaski, Mary
    Schlegel, Peter
    Azziz, Ricardo
    Rebar, Robert
    Farrell, Ruth
    Tipton, Sean
    Crockin, Susan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (02) : 319 - 325
  • [44] Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion
    Daar, Judith
    Benward, Jean
    Collins, Lee
    Davis, Joseph
    Francis, Leslie
    Gates, Elena
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth
    Klipstein, Sigal
    Koenig, Barbara
    La Barbera, Andrew
    McCullough, Laurence
    Reindollar, Richard
    Sauer, Mark
    Sokol, Rebecca
    Tipton, Sean
    Westphal, Lynn
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (07) : E15 - E19
  • [45] Medical, ethical, and legal considerations in fertility preservation
    Shah, Divya K.
    Goldman, Edward
    Fisseha, Senait
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 115 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [46] ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN FERTILITY PRESERVATION FOR TRANSGENDER YOUTH
    Chen, Diane
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 58 (10): : S82 - S82
  • [47] Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients: Ethical Considerations
    Bower, Bethanne
    Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND CANCER IN ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS, 2012, 732 : 187 - 196
  • [48] Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen der telemedizinischen VersorgungLegal considerations of telemedical care
    Hendrik Schneider
    Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie, 2017, 28 (3) : 303 - 306
  • [49] Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist
    Ning, Yilin
    Teixayavong, Salinelat
    Shang, Yuqing
    Savulescu, Julian
    Nagaraj, Vaishaanth
    Miao, Di
    Mertens, Mayli
    Ting, Daniel Shu Wei
    Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling
    Liu, Mingxuan
    Cao, Jiuwen
    Dunn, Michael
    Vaughan, Roger
    Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
    Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu
    Topol, Eric J.
    Liu, Nan
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 6 (11): : e848 - e856
  • [50] New Places and Ethical Spaces: Philosophical Considerations for Health Care Ethics Outside of the Hospital
    Barina, Rachelle
    HEC FORUM, 2015, 27 (02) : 93 - 106