Corporate venture capital and interfirm rivalry: A competitive dynamics perspective

被引:6
|
作者
Chen, Tianxu [1 ]
Chen, Jianhong [2 ]
Miller, Danny [3 ]
Le Breton-Miller, Isabelle [3 ]
Chen, Ming-Jer [4 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, John Chambers Coll Business & Econ, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Peter T Paul Coll Business & Econ, Durham, NH USA
[3] HEC Montreal 3000, Chemin Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Virginia, Darden Sch Business, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
competitive dynamics; corporate investor; corporate venture capital; entrepreneurship; inter-firm rivalry; VALUE CREATION; FIRMS; INVESTMENT; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; CONSEQUENCES; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; US; DIVERSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/sej.1444
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research Summary This study views corporate venture capital (CVC) investment as a form of inter-firm rivalry. Adopting a competitive dynamics perspective, we argue that when a focal corporate investor invests in an entrepreneurial venture, that investment sends important competitive signals to its rivals, thereby increasing their likelihood of initiating a matching response. We theorize how three factors characterizing such investment-the amount of funding, industry relatedness between the corporate investor and the entrepreneurial venture, and the reputation of the corporate investor-can influence rivals' awareness of competitive threat, their motivation to respond, and therefore their likelihood of launching a matching counterattack. Our results demonstrate substantial support for our theoretical model. Managerial Summary This study views CVC investment as a form of competitive interaction, arguing that when a corporate investor participates in an investment round, it sends a competitive signal to its rival, motivating the latter to respond by also investing in CVC. Because of this counteraction, the competitive advantages of firms' CVC strategies may be temporary as rivals catch up and nullify the benefits of a CVC initiative. Thus, when planning strategy, CVC managers need to take potential rival counteractions into account and carefully assess the competitive implications of their CVC strategy, perhaps by avoiding harmful counteractions through initiatives more subtle in execution and orientation, and thus "under the radar" of rivals.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 236
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Venture capital, internationalization strategy and corporate innovation
    Zheng, Xiyue
    Wang, Fusheng
    Zhang, Dongchao
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2024, 39 (11) : 2403 - 2419
  • [32] Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation
    Wadhwa, Anu
    Phelps, Corey
    Kotha, Suresh
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2016, 31 (01) : 95 - 112
  • [33] Steer Clear of Corporate Venture Capital Pitfalls
    Strebulaev, Ilya A.
    Wang, Amanda
    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 65 (03)
  • [34] VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTING FOR CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
    WINTERS, TE
    MURFIN, DL
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 1988, 3 (03) : 207 - 222
  • [35] Corporate venture capital: The role of governance factors
    Anokhin, Sergey
    Peck, Simon
    Wincent, Joakim
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (11) : 4744 - 4749
  • [36] Corporate venture capital, disclosure, and financial reporting
    Hamm, Sophia J. W.
    Jung, Michael J.
    Park, Min
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2021, 29 (06) : 541 - 566
  • [37] Voluntary disclosure of corporate venture capital investments
    Mohamed, Abdulkadir
    Schwienbacher, Armin
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2016, 68 : 69 - 83
  • [38] The impact of corporate venture capital involvement in syndicates
    Kang, Shinhyung
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2019, 57 (01) : 131 - 151
  • [39] WHEN CORPORATE VENTURE CAPITAL DOESNT WORK
    HARDYMON, GF
    DENINO, MJ
    SALTER, MS
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1983, 61 (03) : 114 - 120
  • [40] What is the Real Role of Corporate Venture Capital?
    Lantz, Jean-Sebastien
    Sahut, Jean-Michel
    Teulon, Frederic
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2011, 16 (04): : 367 - 382