Trade potential in European Union manufacturing

被引:0
|
作者
Chatzilazarou, Lazaros Antonios [1 ]
Dadakas, Dimitrios [2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Dept Econ, London, England
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Econ, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Structural gravity; Trade potential; Manufacturing; EU; PPML; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; GRAVITY EQUATION; DETERMINANTS; COSTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/JES-06-2023-0292
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study deals with changes in European Union's (EU's) trade potential in Machinery (HS 84-85) and Transportation (HS86-89) products.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a Structural Gravity model, Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimation together with panel data for the years 2002-2018 and a two-step procedure that employs predicted values of bilateral trade to compare potential to actual trade.FindingsResults for Machinery products suggest a potential to expand trade with existing Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) in the American continent, and countries of the IGAD region in Africa. In Transportation, a high trade potential with RTAs is found in the Americas, Africa and the Middle East. Policy suggestions concentrate on opportunities for enhancing trade relations through trade liberalization and agreement proliferation.Originality/valueThere are no studies to date, that examine "collective" measure of EU trade potential, that treats the EU as a single country. Changes in existing opportunities to expand trade, common for EU members, are of special interest for policy formulation, especially after the recent turmoil presented by the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the Greek Economic Crisis (GEC). Treating the EU as a single entity, is necessary for the formulation of an effective, common, EU trade policy. This study concentrates on the manufacturing sector to examine existing opportunities for the EU to expand trade, after the GFC and the GEC. This article deals with Machinery (HS 84 and 85) and Transportation (HS 86 through 89) products as they comprise a significant part of total EU exports, reaching 41% of total exports in 2016. Finally, this study offers a unique illustration of results through trade potential heat maps.
引用
收藏
页码:1144 / 1163
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Restructuring European Union trade with Central and Eastern European countries
    Fidrmuc J.
    Atlantic Economic Journal, 2000, 28 (1) : 83 - 92
  • [42] For whose benefit is trade in medicines in the European Union?
    Costa-Font, Joan
    Kanavos, Panos
    TRIMESTRE ECONOMICO, 2009, 76 (302): : 331 - 347
  • [43] Digital Trade Enablers and Barriers in the European Union
    Kersan-Skabic, Ines
    MONTENEGRIN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2021, 17 (04) : 99 - 109
  • [44] EUROPEAN UNION: SECOND GENERATION TRADE AGREEMENTS
    Zagashvili, Vladislav S.
    MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2020, 64 (07): : 26 - 33
  • [45] Trade and the location of industries in the OECD and European Union
    Storper, M
    Chen, YC
    De Paolis, F
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2002, 2 (01) : 73 - 107
  • [46] Vulnerability of European Union Economies in Agro Trade
    Civin, Lubomir
    Smutka, Lubos
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [47] Trade Policy and Political Legitimacy in the European Union
    Sophie Meunier
    Comparative European Politics, 2003, 1 (1) : 67 - 90
  • [48] International trade and economic law and the European Union
    Herrmann, C
    COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2003, 40 (04): : 1012 - 1014
  • [49] ON THE WAY TO THE INCREASE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION TRADE COMPETITIVENESS
    Fojtikova, Lenka
    Vahalik, Bohdan
    Stanickova, Michaela
    INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2015: CURRENT ISSUES OF WORLD ECONOMY AND POLITICS, 2015, : 266 - 276
  • [50] Trade agreements and sugar policy in the European Union
    Thiesen, E
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 1997, 113 (7-8): : 180 - 182