A review of how decision support tools address resource recovery in sanitation systems

被引:4
|
作者
Ddiba, Daniel [1 ,4 ]
Andersson, Kim [2 ]
Dickin, Sarah [2 ]
Ekener, Elisabeth [1 ]
Finnveden, Goran [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn, Teknikringen 10B, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Environm Inst, Linnegatan 87D,Box 24218, S-10451 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol Environm Sustainabil, Belvaux, Luxembourg
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Dag Hammarskjoldsvag 14B, S-75237 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Circular economy; Resource recovery; Decision support tools; Biowaste; Sanitation systems; Sanitation economy; WASTE-WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118365
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Globally, there is increasing interest in recovering resources from sanitation systems. However, the process of planning and implementing circular sanitation is complex and can necessitate software-based tools to support decision-making. In this paper, we review 24 decision support software tools used for sanitation planning, to generate insights into how they address resource recovery across the sanitation chain. The findings reveal that the tools can address many planning issues around resource recovery in sanitation including analysis of material flows, integrating resource recovery technologies and products in the design of sanitation systems, and assessing the sustainability implications of resource recovery. The results and recommendations presented here can guide users in the choice of different tools depending on, for example, what kind of tool features and functions the user is interested in as well as the elements of the planning process and the sanitation service chain that are in focus. However, some issues are not adequately covered and need improvements in the available tools including quantifying the demand for and value of resource recovery products, addressing retrofitting of existing sanitation infrastructure for resource recovery and assessing social impacts of resource recovery from a life cycle perspective. While there is scope to develop new tools or to modify existing ones to cover these gaps, communication efforts are needed to create awareness about existing tools, their functions and how they address resource recovery. It is also important to further integrate the available tools into infrastructure planning and programming processes by e.g. customizing to relevant planning regimes and procedures, to move them beyond research and pilots into practice, and hopefully contribute towards more circular sanitation systems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Decision Support Systems Used in Transplantation: Are They Tools for Success or an Unnecessary Gadget? A Systematic Review
    Wingfield, Laura R.
    Salaun, Achille
    Khan, Aparajita
    Webb, Helena
    Zhu, Tingting
    Knight, Simon
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (01) : 72 - 99
  • [32] A Review of Waste Management Decision Support Tools and Their Ability to Assess Circular Biowaste Management Systems
    Vea, Eldbjorg Blikra
    Martinez-Sanchez, Veronica
    Thomsen, Marianne
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [33] USING RISK ANALYSIS TOOLS TO CREATE DECISION RULES FOR DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
    Skorokhodov, Dmitry A.
    Stepanov, Ilya V.
    Turusov, Sergey N.
    Nikitin, Nikolay V.
    MARINE INTELLECTUAL TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 3 (03): : 114 - 120
  • [34] Comparative analysis of sanitation systems for resource recovery: Influence of configurations and single technology components
    Spuhler, Dorothee
    Scheidegger, Andreas
    Maurer, Max
    WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 186
  • [35] A review of sanitation technologies to achieve multiple sustainable development goals that promote resource recovery
    Orner, Kevin D.
    Mihelcic, James R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 4 (01) : 16 - 32
  • [36] The use of decision support systems to address spatial variability, uncertainty, and risk
    Knowlton, RG
    Peterson, DM
    Zhang, HB
    SPATIAL METHODS FOR SOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC PROBLEMS-SCIENCE, POLICY, AND STANDARDIZATION, 2003, 1420 : 109 - 121
  • [37] Decision support tools for product customisation: an in-depth review
    Powell, Carter
    Yang, Sheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01) : 62 - 97
  • [38] Review of decision support tools to operationalize the ecosystem services concept
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Siren, Elina
    Brunner, Sibyl Hanna
    Weibel, Bettina
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 26 : 306 - 315
  • [39] Delivering environmental decision support systems: software tools and techniques
    Rizzoli, AE
    Young, WJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 1997, 12 (2-3) : 237 - 249
  • [40] DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS - TRANSLATING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES INTO USEFUL TOOLS
    KEEN, PGW
    SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1980, 21 (03): : 33 - 44