Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comprehensive contrastive analysis with propensity score matching

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Chenggang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Peng [1 ]
Yu, Jiaxian [1 ]
Jiang, Qi [1 ]
Shen, Qian [1 ]
Mao, Gan [1 ]
Kargbo, Abu Bakarr [1 ]
Liu, Weizhen [1 ]
Zeng, Xiangyu [1 ]
Yin, Yuping [1 ]
Tao, Kaixiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Wuhan 430022, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Open surgery; Surgical oncology; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; OPEN DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; D2; GASTRECTOMY; SURGERY; MORBIDITY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CLASSIFICATION; MORTALITY; RATIO;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-023-03221-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is increasingly applied in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). However, there is no study to comprehensively evaluate the clinicopathological, prognostic, and laboratory data such as nutrition, immune, inflammation-associated indexes, and tumor markers between LG and open gastrectomy (OG) for LAGC following NC.Methods The clinicopathological, prognostic, and laboratory data of LAGC patients with clinical stage of cT2-4aN1-3M0 who underwent gastrectomy after NC were retrospectively collected. The effects of LG and OG were compared after propensity score matching (PSM).Results This study enrolled 148 cases, of which 110 cases were included after PSM. The LG group had a shorter length of incision (P < 0.001) and was superior to OG group in terms of blood loss (P < 0.001), postoperative first flatus time (P < 0.001), and postoperative first liquid diet time (P = 0.004). No significant difference was found in postoperative complications (P = 0.482). Laboratory results showed that LG group had less reduced red blood cells (P = 0.039), hemoglobin (P = 0.018), prealbumin (P = 0.010) in 3 days after surgery, and less reduced albumin in 1 day (P = 0.029), 3 days (P = 0.015), and 7 days (P = 0.035) after surgery than the OG group. The systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic inflammatory response index were not significantly different between the two groups. As for oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences in postoperative tumor markers of CEA (P = 0.791), CA199 (P = 0.499), and CA724 (P = 0.378). The 5-year relapse-free survival rates (P = 0.446) were 46.9% and 43.3% in the LG and OG groups, with the 5-year overall survival rates (P = 0.742) being 46.7% and 52.1%, respectively; the differences were not statistically significant. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor size >= 4 cm (P = 0.021) and the absence of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.012) were independent risk factors for overall survival.Conclusions LG has faster gastrointestinal recovery, better postoperative nutritional status, and comparable oncological outcomes than OG, which can serve as an alternative surgical method for LAGC patients after NC.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis
    Inokuchi, Mikito
    Nakagawa, Masatoshi
    Tanioka, Toshiro
    Okuno, Keisuke
    Gokita, Kentaro
    Kojima, Kazuyuki
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (02): : 735 - 742
  • [22] Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis
    Mikito Inokuchi
    Masatoshi Nakagawa
    Toshiro Tanioka
    Keisuke Okuno
    Kentaro Gokita
    Kazuyuki Kojima
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 735 - 742
  • [23] Open versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of survival in a western population—on behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer
    Pietro Maria Lombardi
    D. Bernasconi
    G.L. Baiocchi
    M. Berselli
    A. Biondi
    C. Castoro
    M. Catarci
    M. Degiuli
    U. Fumagalli Romario
    S. Giacopuzzi
    F. Marchesi
    D. Marrelli
    M. Mazzola
    S. Molfino
    S. Olmi
    S. Rausei
    F. Rosa
    R. Rosati
    F. Roviello
    S. Santi
    L. Solaini
    F. Staderini
    J. Viganò
    G. Ferrari
    Gastric Cancer, 2022, 25 : 1105 - 1116
  • [24] mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Ding, Miaomiao
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Hu, Huabin
    Cai, Yue
    Ling, Jiayu
    Wu, Zehua
    Xie, Xiaoyu
    Li, Jianxia
    Li, Weiwei
    Deng, Yanhong
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2022, 21 (01) : E12 - E20
  • [25] Long-term oncologic result of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Wu, Si-Yuan
    Ho, Meng-Hsing
    Chang, Hao-Ming
    Hsu, Kuo-Feng
    Yu, Jyh-Cherng
    Chan, De-Chuan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [26] Long-term oncologic result of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Si-Yuan Wu
    Meng-Hsing Ho
    Hao-Ming Chang
    Kuo-Feng Hsu
    Jyh-Cherng Yu
    De-Chuan Chan
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 19
  • [27] Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: safety and short-term oncologic results
    Li, Ziyu
    Shan, Fei
    Wang, Yinkui
    Li, Shuangxi
    Jia, Yongning
    Zhang, Lianhai
    Yin, Daoxin
    Ji, Jianfu
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (10): : 4265 - 4271
  • [28] Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: safety and short-term oncologic results
    Ziyu Li
    Fei Shan
    Yinkui Wang
    Shuangxi Li
    Yongning Jia
    Lianhai Zhang
    Daoxin Yin
    Jiafu Ji
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 4265 - 4271
  • [29] Open versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of survival in a western population-on behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer
    Lombardi, Pietro Maria
    Bernasconi, D.
    Baiocchi, G. L.
    Berselli, M.
    Biondi, A.
    Castoro, C.
    Catarci, M.
    Degiuli, M.
    Romario, U. Fumagalli
    Giacopuzzi, S.
    Marchesi, F.
    Marrelli, D.
    Mazzola, M.
    Molfino, S.
    Olmi, S.
    Rausei, S.
    Rosa, F.
    Rosati, R.
    Roviello, F.
    Santi, S.
    Solaini, L.
    Staderini, F.
    Vigano, J.
    Ferrari, G.
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2022, 25 (06) : 1105 - 1116
  • [30] Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matched analysis
    Yao, Qing
    Sun, Qian-Nan
    Wang, Dao-Rong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)