The impact of corporate social responsibility types on happiness management: a stakeholder theory perspective

被引:20
|
作者
Mu, Hong-Lei [1 ]
Xu, Jiang [1 ]
Chen, Sijing [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Happiness management; Stakeholder theory; Job satisfaction; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; JOB-SATISFACTION; EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION; MEDIATING ROLE; UNIT-LEVEL; CSR; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; RESOURCES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1108/MD-02-2023-0267
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThe main purposes of this research are: first of all, to re-classify the types of corporate social responsibility (CSR) into primary stakeholder-oriented CSR and secondary stakeholder-oriented CSR from the perspective of stakeholders and, second, to investigate empirically how and which types of CSR can better impact employees' job satisfaction and happiness management.Design/methodology/approachAn online self-administered questionnaire was adopted to test the conceptual model. Questionnaires were sent to Chinese employees and restrict the data to those whose companies had experience implementing CSR. The study employed the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique for data analysis using SmartPLS 4.0 software.FindingsFor factors of happiness management, both primary stakeholder-oriented CSR and secondary stakeholder-oriented CSR had significant and positive effects on happiness management. In addition, both primary and secondary stakeholder-oriented CSR positively and significantly affected job satisfaction, with primary stakeholder-oriented CSR way larger than secondary stakeholder-oriented CSR. Job satisfaction, in turn, was positively and significantly associated with happiness management. The results showed that the control variables of gender and education background had significant effects on happiness management.Practical implicationsFirst, the results provide useful empirical evidence in support of the feasibility that firms could develop competitive and sustainable development strategies by paying more attention to CSR practices. In terms of the primary stakeholder-oriented CSR, managers are recommended to put employees' benefits as a priority and invest in the to offer a healthy and safe working environment or employee support programs. In terms of the secondary stakeholder-oriented CSR, managers are suggested to denote parts of earnings to charity and to people in need. Second, in order to create job satisfaction, firms should put a stronger emphasis on CSR practices. When considering job satisfaction, managers should treat their employees in a socially responsible way and fulfill their demands and rights and place this at the core of their CSR activities.Originality/valueFirst, this study makes a contribution to the existing literature by classifying the four important CSR practices into two types from the perspective of stakeholder theory. By incorporating a series of CSR practices and the stakeholder theory, this study provides a comprehensive and reasonable CSR classification, which has not been considered by prior research. Second, this study adds to the literature by defining the construct of happiness management explicitly along with identifying the dimensions of happiness management. Third, to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is one of the first studies exploring the relationship between CSR and happiness management. Finally, this study is among the first to investigate the correlation between job satisfaction and happiness management.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 613
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identification of the Impact of Stakeholder Management on Company Structures Developing Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies
    Roberto Volpentesta, Jorge
    Chahin, Toms
    Fabian Alcain, Marcelo
    Rodolfo Nievas, Gustavo
    Eduardo Spinelli, Hector
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD EMPRESA, 2014, 16 (26): : 65 - 94
  • [22] Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective
    McWilliams, A
    Siegel, D
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (01): : 117 - 127
  • [23] The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management
    Dmytriyev, Sergiy D.
    Freeman, R. Edward
    Horisch, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2021, 58 (06) : 1441 - 1470
  • [24] A knowledge management perspective of corporate social responsibility
    Preuss, Lutz
    Cordoba-Pachon, Jose-Rodrigo
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2009, 9 (04): : 517 - +
  • [25] Factor analysis of corporate environmental responsibility: From the stakeholder theory perspective
    Wang H.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2010, 12 (4) : 481 - 490
  • [26] Driving Corporate Social Responsibility in the Malawian Mining Industry: A Stakeholder Perspective
    Mzembe, Andrew Ngawenja
    Meaton, Julia
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 21 (04) : 189 - 201
  • [27] Mediating role of eWOM's in green behavior interaction and corporate social responsibility: a stakeholder theory perspective
    Saqib, Zulkaif Ahmed
    Ikram, Muhammad
    Qin, Luo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2025,
  • [28] The Extreme-capitalist Face of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Stakeholder Theory
    Kilic, Tolga
    Kalkan, Faruk
    REVISTA DE CERCETARE SI INTERVENTIE SOCIALA, 2017, 57 : 202 - 215
  • [29] Study on Corporate Social Responsibility Evaluation System Based on Stakeholder Theory
    Ma, Jun
    Deng, Liming
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PHOTONICS, 3D-IMAGING, AND VISUALIZATION, 2011, 8205
  • [30] DETERMINANTS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE - AN APPLICATION OF STAKEHOLDER THEORY
    ROBERTS, RW
    ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1992, 17 (06) : 595 - 612