Mixed Methods Community-Engaged Evaluation: Integrating Interventionist and Action Research Frameworks to Understand a Community-Building Violence Prevention Program

被引:1
|
作者
Banyard, Victoria L. [1 ]
Edwards, Katie M. [2 ]
Rizzo, Andrew J. [3 ]
Segura-Montagut, Anna [1 ]
Greenberg, Patricia [4 ]
Kearns, Megan C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Social Work, Ctr Res Ending Violence, 123 Church St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Nebraska Ctr Res Children Youth Families & Sch Li, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[3] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Psychol, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Piscataway, NJ USA
[5] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
interventionist research; sexual violence; prevention; multi-phase mixed methods; BYSTANDER INTERVENTION; SEXUAL VIOLENCE; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1177/15586898221108013
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
While mixed methods research can enhance studies of intervention outcomes and projects where research itself transforms communities through participatory approaches, methodologists need explicit examples. As the field of interpersonal violence prevention increasingly embraces community-level prevention strategies, it may benefit from research methods that mirror community-building prevention processes. A multiphase mixed methods study with sequential and convergent components assessed the feasibility, and impact of a prevention program to change social norms and increase collective efficacy in towns. Joint display analysis created a nuanced picture of the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of the program. This article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by bridging discussions of "interventionist" studies with models of community-based participatory mixed methods research into a combined community-engaged method.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 372
页数:23
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [31] Evaluating the impact of engaging older adults and service providers as research partners in the co-design of a community mobility-promoting program: a mixed methods developmental evaluation study
    MacNeil M.
    Abelson J.
    Moore C.
    Lindsay S.
    Adams J.
    Alshaikhahmed A.
    Jain K.
    Petrie P.
    Ganann R.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 9 (1)