Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes After Transferring More Than One Embryo in Patients With Preimplantation Genetic Testing

被引:2
|
作者
Gerber, Rachel S. [1 ]
Kappy, Michelle
Gingold, Julian
Wu, Haotian
Lieman, Harry J.
Singh, Manvinder
Pollack, Staci E.
Jindal, Sangita
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Reprod Med Associates New York, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2024年 / 143卷 / 01期
关键词
ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LIVE BIRTH; SINGLE; ANEUPLOIDY;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000005443
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Transferring more than one embryo that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies shows improvement in the live-birth rate, but nearly half of pregnancies resulted in multiples, with increased neonatal morbidity. OBJECTIVE:To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes after single embryo transfer (SET) compared with multiple embryo transfer (MET) from frozen-thawed transfer cycles of embryos that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A).METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study from the SART CORS (Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System) national database. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from the SART CORS database for all autologous and donor egg frozen-thawed transfer cycles of embryos that underwent PGT-A between 2014 and 2016, after excluding cycles that used frozen oocytes, fresh embryo transfer, and transfers of embryos from more than one stimulation cycle. Multivariable linear and log-binomial regression models were used to estimate the relative and absolute difference in live-birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight between SET compared with MET.RESULTS:In total, 15,638 autologous egg transfer cycles and 944 donor egg transfer cycles were analyzed. Although the live-birth rate was higher with MET compared with SET in the autologous oocyte cycles (64.7% vs 53.2%, relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95% CI, 1.20-1.28), the multiple pregnancy rate was markedly greater (46.2% vs 1.4%, RR 32.56, 95% CI, 26.55-39.92). Donor oocyte cycles showed similar trends with an increased live-birth rate (62.0% vs 49.7%, RR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.11-1.46) and multiple pregnancy rate (54.0% vs 0.8%) seen with MET compared with SET. Preterm delivery rates and rates of low birth weight were significantly higher in MET compared with SET in both autologous and donor oocyte cycles and were also higher in the subanalysis of singleton deliveries that resulted from MET compared with SET.CONCLUSION:Despite some improvement in live-birth rate, nearly half of the pregnancies that resulted from MET of embryos that underwent PGT-A were multiples. Compared with SET, MET is associated with significantly higher rates of neonatal morbidity, including preterm delivery and low birth weight. The transfer of more than one embryo that underwent PGT-A should continue to be strongly discouraged, and patients should be counseled on the significant potential for adverse outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 100
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis: cohort study and meta-analysis
    Hasson, Joseph
    Limoni, Dana
    Malcov, Mira
    Frumkin, Tsvia
    Amir, Hadar
    Shavit, Tal
    Bay, Bjorn
    Many, Ariel
    Almog, Benjamin
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2017, 35 (02) : 208 - 218
  • [22] Impact of blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on maternal and neonatal outcomes following single frozen embryo transfer cycles
    He, Tingting
    Shi, Wenhao
    Xue, Xia
    Shi, Juanzi
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [23] Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with preimplantation genetic testing in IVF twin pregnancies
    Gulersen, Moti
    Peyser, Alexandra
    Ferraro, Amanda
    Goldman, Randi
    Mullin, Christine
    Li, Xueying
    Krantz, David
    Bornstein, Eran
    Rochelson, Burton
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S555 - S556
  • [24] PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING (PGT) WAS NOT ASSOCIATED TO ADVERSE MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOMES.
    Cozzolino, Mauro
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan A.
    Pellicer, Antonio
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E426 - E427
  • [25] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer
    Boerwinkle, Caroline H.
    Tolcher, Mary C.
    Hoff, Heather S.
    Aagaard, Kjersti M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S545 - S545
  • [26] A Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Donor Egg Single Embryo Transfers With and Without Preimplantation Genetic Testing
    Alexis K. Masbou
    Jenna B. Friedenthal
    David H. McCulloh
    Caroline McCaffrey
    M. Elizabeth Fino
    James A. Grifo
    Frederick Licciardi
    Reproductive Sciences, 2019, 26 : 1661 - 1665
  • [27] A Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Donor Egg Single Embryo Transfers With and Without Preimplantation Genetic Testing
    Masbou, Alexis K.
    Friedenthal, Jenna B.
    McCulloh, David H.
    McCaffrey, Caroline
    Fino, M. Elizabeth
    Grifo, James A.
    Licciardi, Frederick
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 26 (12) : 1661 - 1665
  • [28] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy after one fetal demise
    Kim, H.
    Park, S.
    Lee, M.
    Choi, B.
    Kim, H.
    Park, J.
    Oh, K.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 184 - 184
  • [29] Perspectives of preimplantation genetic testing patients in Belgium on the ethics of polygenic embryo screening
    Siermann, Maria
    Vermeesch, Joris R.
    Raivio, Taneli
    Vanhie, Arne
    Peeraer, Karen
    Tsuiko, Olga
    Borry, Pascal
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 49 (03)
  • [30] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients with low embryo numbers: benefit or harm?
    Arnold M. Mahesan
    Paul T. Chang
    Ruth Ronn
    Anthea B. M. Paul
    Jim Meriano
    Robert F. Casper
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 2027 - 2033