Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes After Transferring More Than One Embryo in Patients With Preimplantation Genetic Testing

被引:2
|
作者
Gerber, Rachel S. [1 ]
Kappy, Michelle
Gingold, Julian
Wu, Haotian
Lieman, Harry J.
Singh, Manvinder
Pollack, Staci E.
Jindal, Sangita
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Reprod Med Associates New York, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2024年 / 143卷 / 01期
关键词
ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LIVE BIRTH; SINGLE; ANEUPLOIDY;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000005443
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Transferring more than one embryo that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies shows improvement in the live-birth rate, but nearly half of pregnancies resulted in multiples, with increased neonatal morbidity. OBJECTIVE:To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes after single embryo transfer (SET) compared with multiple embryo transfer (MET) from frozen-thawed transfer cycles of embryos that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A).METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study from the SART CORS (Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System) national database. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from the SART CORS database for all autologous and donor egg frozen-thawed transfer cycles of embryos that underwent PGT-A between 2014 and 2016, after excluding cycles that used frozen oocytes, fresh embryo transfer, and transfers of embryos from more than one stimulation cycle. Multivariable linear and log-binomial regression models were used to estimate the relative and absolute difference in live-birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight between SET compared with MET.RESULTS:In total, 15,638 autologous egg transfer cycles and 944 donor egg transfer cycles were analyzed. Although the live-birth rate was higher with MET compared with SET in the autologous oocyte cycles (64.7% vs 53.2%, relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95% CI, 1.20-1.28), the multiple pregnancy rate was markedly greater (46.2% vs 1.4%, RR 32.56, 95% CI, 26.55-39.92). Donor oocyte cycles showed similar trends with an increased live-birth rate (62.0% vs 49.7%, RR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.11-1.46) and multiple pregnancy rate (54.0% vs 0.8%) seen with MET compared with SET. Preterm delivery rates and rates of low birth weight were significantly higher in MET compared with SET in both autologous and donor oocyte cycles and were also higher in the subanalysis of singleton deliveries that resulted from MET compared with SET.CONCLUSION:Despite some improvement in live-birth rate, nearly half of the pregnancies that resulted from MET of embryos that underwent PGT-A were multiples. Compared with SET, MET is associated with significantly higher rates of neonatal morbidity, including preterm delivery and low birth weight. The transfer of more than one embryo that underwent PGT-A should continue to be strongly discouraged, and patients should be counseled on the significant potential for adverse outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 100
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Obstetric, neonatal, and child health outcomes following embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing
    Alteri, Alessandra
    Cermisoni, Greta Chiara
    Pozzoni, Mirko
    Gaeta, Gerarda
    Cavoretto, Paolo Ivo
    Vigano, Paola
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2023, 29 (03) : 291 - 306
  • [2] No benefit of transferring more than one embryo even without using preimplantation genetic screening
    Nanassy, L.
    Teglas, G.
    Vereczkey, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 235 - 235
  • [3] Neonatal and clinical outcomes after transfer of a mosaic embryo identified by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies
    Yakovlev, Pavel
    Vyatkina, Svetlana
    Polyakov, Alex
    Pavlova, Marina
    Volkomorov, Victor
    Yakovlev, Maksim
    Filimonov, Sergey
    Kazaryn, Liya
    Aizikovich, Asia
    Kornilov, Nikolay
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (01) : 88 - 100
  • [4] ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING AND ADVERSE OBSTETRIC AND NEONATAL OUTCOMES.
    Speedy, Sedona E.
    Mumm, Margaret M.
    Premkumar, Ashish
    Boots, Christina E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : E388 - E389
  • [5] Transferring more than one embryo simultaneously is justifiable in most patients
    Gleicher, Norbert
    Orvieto, Raoul
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 44 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [6] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is not related to adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies
    Cozzolino, Mauro
    Nardini Cecchino, Gustavo
    Garcia Velasco, Juan Antonio
    Pellicer, Nuria
    Galliano, Daniela
    Pellicer, Antonio
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 (08) : 1621 - 1627
  • [7] Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing
    Gulersen, Moti
    Peyser, Alexandra
    Ferraro, Amanda
    Goldman, Randi
    Mullin, Christine
    Li, Xueying
    Krantz, David
    Bornstein, Eran
    Rochelson, Burton
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2021, 41 (07) : 835 - 842
  • [8] Impact of trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis
    Mao, Di
    Xu, Jian
    Sun, Ling
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (02) : 199 - 212.e5
  • [9] Impact of preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hou, Wenhui
    Shi, Gaohui
    Ma, Yuanlin
    Liu, Yongxiang
    Lu, Manman
    Fan, Xiuli
    Sun, Yingpu
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (04) : 990 - 1000
  • [10] Preimplantation genetic testing for more than one genetic condition: clinical and ethical considerations and dilemmas
    van der Schoot, V.
    Dondorp, W.
    Dreesen, J. C. F. M.
    Coonen, E.
    Paulussen, A. D. C.
    de Wert, G.
    de Die-Smulders, C. E. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 (06) : 1146 - 1154