Patient-reported outcome measures in adult HIV care: A rapid scoping review of targeted outcomes and instruments used

被引:2
|
作者
Engler, Kim [1 ]
Avallone, Francesco [2 ]
Cadri, Abdul [2 ]
Lebouche, Bertrand [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Res Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Family Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Royal Victoria Hosp, Chron Viral Illness Serv, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
clinical practice; HIV; measurement; mental health; patient-reported outcomes; screening; substance use; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; UNHEALTHY ALCOHOL-USE; ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; HEALTH-CARE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; INFECTED INDIVIDUALS; DEPRESSION TREATMENT; BRIEF INTERVENTION; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; NEUROCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1111/hiv.13599
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: There is international interest in the integration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine HIV care, but little work has synthesized the content of published initiatives. We conducted a rapid scoping review primarily to identify their selected patient-reported outcomes and respective instruments. Methods: Four databases were searched on 4 May 2022 (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO) for relevant English language documents published from 2005 onwards. Dual review of at least 20% of records, full texts and data extraction was performed. Outcomes and instruments were classified with an adapted 14-domain taxonomy. Instruments with evidence of validation were described. Results: Of 13 062 records generated for review, we retained a final sample of 94 documents, referring to 60 distinct initiatives led mostly in the USA (n = 29; 48% of initiatives), Europe (n = 16; 27%) and Africa (n = 9; 15%). The measured patient-reported outcome domains were: mental health (n = 42; 70%), substance use (n = 23; 38%), self-management (n = 16; 27%), symptoms (n = 12; 20%), sexual/reproductive health (n = 12; 20%), physical health (n = 9; 15%), treatment (n= 8; 13%), cognition (n = 7; 12%), quality of life (n = 7; 12%), violence/abuse (n = 6; 10%), stigma (n = 6; 10%), socioeconomic issues (n = 5; 8%), social support (n = 3; 5%) and body/facial appearance (n = 1; 2%). Initiatives measured 2.6 outcome domains, on average (range = 1-11). In total, 62 distinct validated PROMs were identified, with 53 initiatives (88%) employing at least one (M = 2.2). Overwhelmingly, the most used instrument was any version of the Patient Health Questionnaire to measure symptoms of depression, employed by over a third (26; 43%) of initiatives. Conclusion: Published PROM initiatives in HIV care have spanned 19 countries and disproportionately target mental health and substance use.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 674
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-reported outcome measures in third molar surgery: a scoping review
    O'Sullivan, Laura
    Riordain, Richeal Ni
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (09): : 1145 - 1150
  • [22] Patient-reported outcome measures in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol
    Poulsen, Ninna Rysholt
    Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen
    Sovso, Morten Breinholt
    Leutscher, Peter Derek Christian
    Pedersen, Mona Kyndi
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (11) : 3102 - 3112
  • [23] Guidelines for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Jung, Andres
    Challoumas, Dimitris
    Pagels, Larissa
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Braun, Tobias
    Luedtke, Kerstin
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (06) : 363 - 373
  • [24] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures used following hip or knee arthroplasty: a scoping review
    Karimijashni, Motahareh
    Abbasalipour, Shokoofih
    Westby, Marie
    Ramsay, Tim
    Beaule, Paul E.
    Poitras, Stephane
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [25] A Review of HIV-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Engler, Kim
    Lessard, David
    Lebouche, Bertrand
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2017, 10 (02): : 187 - 202
  • [26] A Review of HIV-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Kim Engler
    David Lessard
    Bertrand Lebouché
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2017, 10 : 187 - 202
  • [27] A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care
    Hanh Nguyen
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Sundaresan, Puma
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [28] Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Proms)
    Weldring, Theresa
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2013, 6 : 61 - 68
  • [29] Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments Used for Measurement of Adherence to Inhaled Corticosteroids in Adults with Asthma: A Systematic Scoping Review
    Gagne, Myriam E.
    Boulet, Louis-Philippe
    Perez, Norma
    Moisan, Jocelyne
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 160 - 161
  • [30] Patient-reported outcomes in breast oncology: a review of validated outcome instruments
    Kanatas, Anastasios
    Velikova, Galina
    Roe, Brenda
    Horgan, Kieran
    Ghazali, Naseem
    Shaw, Richard J.
    Rogers, Simon N.
    TUMORI, 2012, 98 (06) : 678 - 688