The Property Right to Voice

被引:0
|
作者
Margalit, Avital [1 ]
Stern, Shai [2 ]
机构
[1] Sapir Acad Coll, Ashqelon, Israel
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Ramat Gan, Israel
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE | 2024年 / 37卷 / 01期
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Democratic participation; Freedom of speech; Property rights; Private law theory; FREE SPEECH; LAW; COMPENSATION; JUSTICE; TAKINGS; NIMBY;
D O I
10.1017/cjlj.2023.13
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Should property owners have a unique right to express their opinion just because they own property? While current law recognizes owners' rights to express their voices in certain instances, it does not provide comprehensive and coherent answers to this question. This article provides an analytical framework for recognizing the owners' right to voice as an independent property entitlement within the owners' property bundle of rights and delineates its boundaries. Yet even when the owners' voice is property-dependent, there is a difference between voice that facilitates the realization of another property entitlement (such as the right to exclude, use, or trade) and voice that is constitutive to ownership in and of itself. Only the latter instances justify recognition of the owners' right to a voice as an independent property entitlement. By examining different branches of both tangible and intellectual property law, such as inheritance law, eminent domain, homeowners' association law, zoning law, and copyright law, this article demonstrates the usefulness of the proposed analytical framework in explaining certain parts of the current law and suggests modifications of other parts.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 197
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE RIGHT BRAIN GETS A VOICE AND A SPINE
    COOK, WA
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 1991, 31 (05) : 7 - 8
  • [32] "Private Property as This" - Interpretation of Hegel's Right to Property
    不详
    HEGEL-STUDIEN, 2014, : 47 - 133
  • [33] RIGHT ON TIME: FIRST POSSESSION IN PROPERTY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
    Oliar, Dotan
    Stern, James Y.
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2019, 99 (02) : 395 - 458
  • [34] RIGHT TO PROPERTY-IS IT FUNDAMENTAL
    SARKAR, RCS
    SHARAN, P
    SUDA, JP
    MAHAJANI, U
    MATHUR, RN
    ANAND, PL
    SETALVAD, MC
    RUTHNASWAMY, M
    INDIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1971, 5 (02): : 177 - 204
  • [35] The Property Right in a Sports Telecast
    Mayo, Louis H.
    VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1949, 35 (02) : 246 - 263
  • [36] THE SOCIETY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY
    Vacaru, Nadia-Elena
    Ciobanu, Alexandru-Iulian
    SGEM 2015, BOOK 3: ANTHROPOLOGY, ARCHAEOLOGY, HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY, 2015, : 205 - 212
  • [37] THE RIGHT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY: A JUSTIFICATION
    Kekes, John
    SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY, 2010, 27 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [38] PROPERTY RIGHT PARADIGM - COMMENT
    HUTTER, M
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 1975, 188 (06): : 552 - 556
  • [39] Grotius on Property and the Right of Necessity
    Klimchuk, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, 2018, 56 (02) : 239 - 260
  • [40] A property right to medical care
    Earnest, Mark
    Matthew, Dayna Bowen
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2008, 29 (01) : 65 - 80