The 2022 energy crisis: Fuel poverty and the impact of policy interventions in Australia's National Electricity Market

被引:26
|
作者
Simshauser, Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Ctr Appl Energy Econ, Nathan, Australia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Energy Policy Res Grp, Cambridge, England
关键词
Electricity markets; Energy policy; Fuel poverty; FEED-IN TARIFFS; NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSES; INCOME; AFFORDABILITY; QUEENSLAND; PRICES; POOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106660
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The war in Ukraine and associated 2022 energy crisis had far-reaching effects, with seaborne prices for coal and gas reaching multiples of their historic averages. While Europe was the epicentre, countries as far away as Australia were impacted. Governments across multiple jurisdictions have since orchestrated very material energy subsidies for households to reduce the adverse effects, with fiscal estimates across EU member states ranging from 0.5 to 7% of GDP. As a major energy exporter, the Australian Government took a different policy pathway by targeting the source of electricity tariff increases, viz. imposing price caps of $125/t and $12/GJ for coal and gas, respectively. Some state governments in Australia also revised their household energy hardship policies. This article analyses the level of fuel poverty before-and after-the array of Commonwealth and State policy in-terventions. Commonwealth policy had the effect of moderating forecast electricity tariff increases from 35% to 16.5%, which benefits all customers. However, State Government customer hardship policy remains vitally important and makes the dominant contribution in reducing fuel poverty.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of China's Differential Electricity Pricing policy on fossil fuel consumption
    Zhao, Lin
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF ECONOMICS, 2023, 18 (01): : 97 - 119
  • [42] Least cost, utility scale abatement from Australia's NEM (National Electricity Market). Part 2: Scenarios and policy implications
    Brear, M. J.
    Jeppesen, M.
    Chattopadhyay, D.
    Manzie, C.
    Alpcan, T.
    Dargaville, R.
    ENERGY, 2016, 101 : 621 - 628
  • [43] Decarbonising Australia's National Electricity Market and the role of firm, low-carbon technologies
    Davis, Dominic
    Brear, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 373
  • [44] The Coordinated Development Path of Renewable Energy and National Economy in China Considering Risks of Electricity Market and Energy Policy
    Xiao, Yunpeng
    Wang, Xifan
    Wang, Xiuli
    Wu, Zechen
    Liu, Wei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 13 (05) : 2566 - 2575
  • [45] ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRICITY MARKET LIBERALIZATION IMPACT ON SUCCESS IN ACHIEVING EU ENERGY POLICY TARGETS IN LITHUANIA
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Cibinskiene, Akvile
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (01):
  • [46] On dividend policy and market valuations of Australia?s listed electricity utilities: Regulated vs. merchant
    Simshauser, Paul
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 77 : 696 - 715
  • [47] Open grid model of Australia’s National Electricity Market allowing backtesting against historic data
    Aleksis Xenophon
    David Hill
    Scientific Data, 5
  • [48] Renewable entry costs, project finance and the role of revenue quality in Australia?s National Electricity Market
    Gohdes, Nicholas
    Simshauser, Paul
    Wilson, Clevo
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 114
  • [49] Renewable entry costs, project finance and the role of revenue quality in Australia's National Electricity Market
    Gohdes, Nicholas
    Simshauser, Paul
    Wilson, Clevo
    Energy Economics, 2022, 114
  • [50] Coal generator revenues and the rise of renewable generation: Evidence from Australia's national electricity market
    Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna
    Manchester, Julia
    Ancev, Tihomir
    ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 178