Development and validation of a multivariable risk factor questionnaire to detect oesophageal cancer in 2-week wait patients

被引:1
|
作者
Ho, Kai Man Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Rosenfeld, Avi [3 ]
Hogan, Aine [1 ]
McBain, Hazel [1 ]
Duku, Margaret [1 ]
Wolfson, Paul B. D. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, Ashley [1 ]
Cheung, Sharon M. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Hennelly, Laura [1 ]
Macabodbod, Lester [1 ]
Graham, David G. [4 ]
Sehgal, Vinay [4 ]
Banerjee, Amitava [5 ,6 ]
Lovat, Laurence B. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, Charles Bell House,43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TY, England
[2] UCL, Wellcome EPSRC Ctr Intervent & Surg Sci WEISS, Charles Bell House,43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TY, England
[3] Jerusalem Coll Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Havaad Haleumi 21, IL-91160 Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Serv, 235 Euston Rd, London NW1 2BU, England
[5] UCL, Inst Hlth Informat, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, England
[6] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, St Bartholomews Hosp, Dept Cardiol, London EC1A 7BE, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
COVID-19; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LONELINESS; DEPRESSION; MALIGNANCY; MORTALITY; SYMPTOMS; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102087
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Oesophageal cancer is associated with poor health outcomes. Upper GI (UGI) endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis but is associated with patient discomfort and low yield for cancer. We used a machine learning approach to create a model which predicted oeso-phageal cancer based on questionnaire responses.Methods: We used data from 2 separate prospective cross-sectional studies: the Saliva to Predict rIsk of disease using Transcriptomics and epigenetics (SPIT) study and predicting RIsk of diSease using detailed Questionnaires (RISQ) study. We recruited patients from National Health Service (NHS) suspected cancer pathways as well as patients with known cancer. We identified patient characteristics and questionnaire responses which were most associated with the development of oesophageal cancer. Using the SPIT dataset, we trained seven different machine learning mod-els, selecting the best area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) to create our final model. We further applied a cost function to maximise cancer detection. We then independently vali-dated the model using the RISQ dataset.Results: 807 patients were included in model training and testing, split in a 70:30 ratio. 294 patients were included in model validation. The best model during training was regularised logis-tic regression using 17 features (median AUC: 0.81, interquartile range (IQR): 0.69-0.85). For testing and validation datasets, the model achieved an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.61-0.81) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96) respectively. At a set cut off, our model achieved a sensitivity of 97.6% and specificity of 59.1%. We additionally piloted the model in 12 patients with gastric cancer; 9/12 (75%) of patients were correctly classified.Conclusions: We have developed and validated a risk stratification tool using a questionnaire approach. This could aid prioritising patients at high risk of having oesophageal cancer for endos-copy. Our tool could help address endoscopic backlogs caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A NEW LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL 2-WEEK WAIT 'DIRECT TO TEST' PATHWAY RESULTS IN EARLIER DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER
    Humphries, A.
    Clarke, J.
    Bhatnagar, G.
    Jenkins, I.
    Burling, D.
    Thomas-Gibson, S.
    GUT, 2013, 62 : A262 - A262
  • [22] WHAT IS THE YIELD OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER FROM INVESTIGATION OF "2-WEEK WAIT" REFERRALS WITH IRON DEFICIENCY ANAEMIA?
    Lovett, K.
    Logan, R. F.
    GUT, 2010, 59 : A59 - A59
  • [23] The 2-week wait referral system does not improve 5-year colorectal cancer survival
    Zafar, A.
    Mak, T.
    Whinnie, S.
    Chapman, M. A. S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (04) : E177 - E180
  • [24] Implementing the 2-week wait rule for cancer referral in the UK: general practitioners' views and practices.
    Dodds, W
    Morgan, M
    Wolfe, C
    Raju, KS
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2004, 13 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [25] Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of utilization of the 2-week wait skin cancer pathway
    Ross, Hannah
    Kukuswadia, Shane
    Azurdia, Richard
    West, Elizabeth
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 187 : 120 - 120
  • [26] The increasing burden of the 2-week wait colorectal cancer pathway in a single centre: the impact of faecal immunochemical tests
    Farkas, N.
    O'Brien, J. W.
    Palyvos, L.
    Maclean, W.
    Benton, S.
    Rockall, T.
    Jourdan, I
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2024, 106 (04) : 338 - 343
  • [27] Referral letters for 2-week wait suspected colorectal cancer do not allow a 'straight-to-test' pathway
    Aljarabah, M. M.
    Borley, N. R.
    Goodman, A. J.
    Wheeler, J. M. D.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2009, 91 (02) : 106 - 109
  • [28] The 2-week wait service: a UK tertiary colorectal centre's experience in the early identification of colorectal cancer
    Patel, Rikesh K.
    Sayers, Adele E.
    Seedat, Shahid
    Altayeb, Talal
    Hunter, Iain A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 26 (12) : 1408 - 1414
  • [29] Referral letters for 2-week wait suspected breast cancer do not allow a 'straight-to-test' pathway
    Pal, A.
    Pal, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 99 - 99
  • [30] CANCER AND ADENOMA DETECTION RATE IN 2-WEEK WAIT COLONOSCOPY AND CT COLONOGRAPHY-TERTIARY CENTRE EXPERIENCE
    Chaudhary, Sardar
    Pancholi, Jay
    Ivan, Catalin
    Verma, Ratan
    Elabassy, Mosheir
    Robinson, Richard J.
    Stephenson, James A.
    GUT, 2018, 67 : A23 - A23