Global warming potential comparison between green and conventional roofs in cold climate using life cycle assessment

被引:4
|
作者
Pique, Laurie [1 ]
Blanchet, Pierre [2 ]
Breton, Charles [3 ]
机构
[1] Dept Wood Sci, Ind Res Chaire Ecoresponsible Wood Construciton, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[2] NSERC Ind Res Chair Sustainable Wood Construct, Programs Wood & Biobased Mat Engn, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Laval Univ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Cold climate; Environmental benefits; Environmental costs; Green roof; Life cycle assessment; Simapro (c); PERFORMANCE; CARBON; IMPACT; SEQUESTRATION; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138314
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Buildings are major contributors to climate change because of the greenhouse gas emissions released during their life cycle. Among building systems, green roofs are known for their potential environmental benefits. Many studies have focused on the environmental impacts of green roofs without considering their ability to sequester carbon. Furthermore, this environmental benefit is not well characterized in the cold climate conditions of the province of Quebec, Canada. The aim of this study was to identify the decoupling point between the environmental costs and the environmental benefits of green roofs compared to a conventional roof in a renewable energy mix, namely hydropower, and a cold climate context, namely subarctic climate. Few articles have modeled a comparative LCA taking into account a subarctic climate. Four roof assemblies were compared: extensive, semi-intensive and intensive green roofs, and one conventional roof. First, a cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis was conducted in Simapro (c) to assess the environmental impacts of the different roof assemblies. Then, a dynamic life cycle analysis was performed to quantify the environmental benefits. At this stage, the rate of carbon sequestration by plants planted on the three types of green roofs was taken into consideration, a factor not considered in many articles. The results indicate that the global warming potential of conventional roof, extensive, semi-intensive and intensive green roofs were 3328.54 kg CO2 eq, 3113.15 kg CO2 eq, 3147.45 kg CO2 eq and 3432.05 kg CO2 eq, respectively, over 45 years. Considering environmental benefits, the global warming potential of extensive, semi-intensive and intensive green roofs were reduced to 3051.5 kg CO2 eq, 3007.5 kg CO2 eq and 3292.1 kg CO2 eq, respectively. These results suggest that for a cold climate, the environmental benefits of green roofs are greater than the environmental costs of semi-intensive and intensive green roofs after 14 and 35 years of installation, respectively. For the extensive roof, it shows a carbon benefit for all 45 years. The highlights of this study are that green roofs have significant intrinsic impacts due to the materials they require. Another point is that carbon sequestration is negligible in reducing CO2 emissions in cold climates. A final point is that green roofs with a lifespan of less than 45 years increase their carbon impact.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle assessment of salmon cold chains: comparison between chilling and superchilling technologies
    Hoang, H. M.
    Brown, T.
    Indergard, E.
    Leducq, D.
    Alvarez, G.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 126 : 363 - 372
  • [32] Multi-scale assessment of global warming mitigation potential of anaerobic digestion for food waste management in the United States: A comparison of Life Cycle Assessment approaches
    Karaiskakis, Alexandros N.
    Hernandez, Borja
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 203
  • [33] Modeling Global Warming Potential, Variable Costs, and Water Use of Young Plant Production System Components Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Ingram, Dewayne L.
    Hall, Charles R.
    Knight, Joshua
    HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (10) : 1356 - 1361
  • [34] Environmental performance analysis of railway infrastructure using life cycle assessment: Selecting pavement projects based on global warming potential impacts
    Ribeiro, Filipe Batista
    Do Nascimento, Filipe Almeida Correa
    Da Sliva, Marcelino Aurelio Viera
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [35] A comparison of solar and conventional pavements via life cycle assessment
    Hu, Hengwu
    Vizzari, Domenico
    Zha, Xudong
    Mantalovas, Konstantinos
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 119
  • [36] A life cycle assessment comparison of rapeseed biodiesel and conventional diesel
    Stow, M.
    McManus, M. C.
    Bannister, C.
    SUSTAINABLE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES: DRIVING THE GREEN AGENDA, 2012, : 23 - 33
  • [37] Modeling cumulative effects in life cycle assessment: The case of fertilizer in wheat production contributing to the global warming potential
    Laratte, Bertrand
    Guillaume, Bertrand
    Kim, Junbeum
    Birregah, Babiga
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 481 : 588 - 595
  • [38] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND SECURITY ACT OF 2007: ETHANOL - GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EMISSIONS
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Hsu, David D.
    Inman, Daniel
    Aden, Andy
    Mann, Margaret K.
    ES2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, VOL 1, 2009, : 857 - 861
  • [39] Understanding the global warming potential of circular design strategies: Life cycle assessment of a design-for-disassembly building
    Roberts, Matthew
    Allen, Stephen
    Clarke, Joanna
    Searle, Justin
    Coley, David
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 37 : 331 - 343
  • [40] Quantifying the global warming potential of low carbon concrete mixes: Comparison of existing life cycle analysis tools
    Witte, Andrew
    Garg, Nishant
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2024, 20