Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation ablation: different recovery courses among cryoballoon, laser balloon, and radiofrequency ablation

被引:1
|
作者
Shigeta, Takatoshi [1 ]
Miyazaki, Shinsuke [1 ]
Isonaga, Yuhei [2 ]
Arai, Hirofumi [3 ]
Miwa, Naoyuki [4 ]
Hayashi, Yosuke [5 ]
Kakehashi, Shota [6 ]
Inaba, Osamu [2 ]
Hachiya, Hitoshi [4 ]
Yamauchi, Yasuteru [3 ]
Nitta, Junichi [5 ]
Tada, Hiroshi [6 ]
Goya, Masahiko [1 ]
Sasano, Tetsuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 1-5-45 Yushima,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138510, Japan
[2] Japanese Red Cross Saitama Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Saitama, Japan
[3] Japan Red Cross Yokohama City Bay Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Yokohama, Japan
[4] Tsuchiura Kyodo Gen Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan
[5] Sakakibara Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Univ Fukui, Fac Med Sci, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Fukui, Japan
关键词
Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Phrenic nerve injury; Cryoballoon; Laser balloon; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; CRYOABLATION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-023-02365-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundPhrenic nerve injury (PNI) is one of the common complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, which often recovers spontaneously. However, the course of its recovery has not been examined fully, especially in regard to the different ablation methods. We sought to compare the recovery course of PNI in cryoballoon, laser balloon, and radiofrequency ablation.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study analyzed 355 patients who suffered from PNI during AF ablation. PNI occurred during cryoballoon ablation (CB group) and laser balloon ablation (LB group) for a pulmonary vein isolation in 288 and 20 patients, and radiofrequency ablation for a superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (RF-SVC group) in 47 patients, respectivelyResultsThere was a significant difference in the estimated probability of PNI recovery after the procedure between the methods (p = 0.01). PNI recovered significantly earlier in the CB group, especially within 24 h and 3 months post-procedure (the percentage of the recovery within 24 h and 3 months: 49.7% and 71.5% in the CB group, 15.0% and 22.2% in the LB group, and 23.4% and 41.9% in the RF-SVC group, respectively). Persistent PNI after 12 months was observed in only seven patients in the CB group, one in the LB group, and four in the RF-SVC group, respectively.ConclusionPNI rarely persists over 12 months after AF ablation; however, there is a difference in the timing of its recovery. PNI recovers quicker with cryoballoon ablation than with laser balloon ablation or radiofrequency ablation of the SVC.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pulmonary veins reconnection pattern differences after failed radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Antoun, I.
    Sihdu, B.
    Mavilakandy, A.
    Merzaka, L.
    Stafford, P.
    Sandilands, A.
    Somani, R.
    Ng, G. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 526 - 526
  • [32] Phrenic nerve paralysis during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: A comparison between the first- and second-generation balloon
    Casado-Arroyo, Ruben
    Chierchia, Gian-Battista
    Conte, Giulio
    Levinstein, Moises
    Sieira, Juan
    Rodriguez-Manero, Moises
    di Giovanni, Giacomo
    Baltogiannis, Yannis
    Wauters, Kristel
    de Asmundis, Carlo
    Sarkozy, Andrea
    Brugada, Pedro
    HEART RHYTHM, 2013, 10 (09) : 1318 - 1324
  • [33] Clinical feasibility of pulmonary vein orifice pacing for the prediction of phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Sano, Makoto
    Urushida, Tsuyoshi
    Matsukura, Gaku
    Sakakibara, Tomoaki
    Suwa, Kenichiro
    Naruse, Yoshihisa
    Ohtani, Hayato
    Saotome, Masao
    Maekawa, Yuichiro
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (08) : 1200 - 1206
  • [34] Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation -: Characterization and outcome in a multicenter study
    Sacher, F
    Monahan, KH
    Thomas, SP
    Davidson, N
    Adragao, P
    Sanders, P
    Hocini, M
    Takahashi, Y
    Rotter, M
    Rostock, T
    Hsu, LF
    Clémenty, J
    Haïssaguerre, M
    Ross, DL
    Packer, DL
    Jaïs, P
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (12) : 2498 - 2503
  • [35] The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
    Ang, Richard
    Domenichini, Giulia
    Finlay, Malcolm C.
    Schilling, Richard J.
    Hunter, Ross J.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (09)
  • [36] The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
    Richard Ang
    Giulia Domenichini
    Malcolm C. Finlay
    Richard J. Schilling
    Ross J. Hunter
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2015, 17
  • [37] Esophagogastric complications in radiofrequency and cryoballoon catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Oikawa, Jun
    Fukaya, Hidehira
    Wada, Takuya
    Kishihara, Jun
    Sato, Tetsuro
    Matsuura, Gen
    Nakamura, Hironori
    Ishizue, Naruya
    Katada, Chikatoshi
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Niwano, Shinichi
    Kusano, Chika
    Ako, Junya
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (06) : 1160 - 1166
  • [38] Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
    Wasserlauf, Jeremiah
    Pelchovitz, Daniel J.
    Rhyner, John
    Verma, Nishant
    Bohn, Martha
    Li, Zhi
    Arora, Rishi
    Chicos, Alexandru B.
    Goldberger, Jeffrey J.
    Kim, Susan S.
    Lin, Albert C.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    Passman, Rod S.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (04): : 483 - 489
  • [39] Radiofrequency current or cryoballoon for ablation of atrial fibrillation? Hot or cold?
    Reissmann, B.
    Kuck, K. -H.
    Metzner, A.
    HERZ, 2017, 42 (04) : 352 - 356
  • [40] Right ureteral injury after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Hoestje, S. M.
    Bertsch, J. R.
    Lakkireddy, D. R.
    Holzbelerlein, J. M.
    UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (04) : 948.e5 - 948.e6