Current Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction and the Implications of Impending Changes to Insurance Reimbursement

被引:3
|
作者
Fijany, Arman J. [1 ]
Friedlich, Nicole [2 ]
Olsson, Sofia E. [2 ]
Bishay, Anthony E. [3 ]
Pekarev, Maxim [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Texas Christian Univ, Anne Burnett Mar Sch Med, Ft Worth, TX USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Neurosurg, Sch Med, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
socioeconomic disparities; insurance reimbursement; s-codes; diep flap; autologous breast reconstruction;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.43855
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In 2019, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) combined all autologous breast flap procedures under one billing code, effective from December 31, 2024. This change will result in equal insurance reimbursement rates for popular flap options, such as transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, which were previously billed separately using S-codes based on complexity. Methods This study aimed to analyze insurance code changes for autologous breast reconstruction flap procedures. Data were collected from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' annual plastic surgery statistics reports, including specific insurance codes and case volumes from 2007 to 2020. A comprehensive analysis was conducted to assess recent trends in flap utilization rates, documenting any modifications or additions to the existing codes and their implementation years. Results The study analyzed billing codes and case volumes for autologous breast reconstruction procedures, with a focus on the DIEP flap and other alternatives. Non-autologous breast reconstruction procedures showed consistently higher case volumes compared to autologous procedures from 2007 to 2020. Notably, the popularity of the DIEP flap surpassed that of other flap options after 2011. Conclusion The removal of S-codes for autologous breast reconstruction by CMS and the subsequent potential decrease in insurance coverage for the DIEP flap may lead to a decrease in its utilization and a shift toward more invasive options, like the TRAM flap. This change could result in financial burdens for patients and widen socioeconomic disparities in breast reconstruction, limiting access to preferred reconstructive methods and impacting patient autonomy and overall well-being.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current trends in the integration and reimbursement of complementary and alternative medicine by managed care, insurance carriers, and hospital providers
    Pelletier, KR
    Marie, A
    Krasner, M
    Haskell, WL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1997, 12 (02) : 112 - 122
  • [22] The Insurance Landscape for Implant- and Autologous-based Breast Reconstruction in the United States
    Boyd, Louisa C.
    Greenfield, Jason A.
    Ainapurapu, Sravya S.
    Skladman, Rachel
    Skolnick, Gary
    Sundaramoorthi, Durai
    Sacks, Justin M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (02) : E4818
  • [23] Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Tissue: Current Operative Standards and New Techniques
    Fansa, H.
    Giunta, R. E.
    HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2008, 40 (04) : 217 - 218
  • [24] Trends in immediate breast reconstruction across insurance groups after enactment of breast cancer legislation
    Yang, Rachel L.
    Newman, Andrew S.
    Lin, Ines C.
    Reinke, Caroline E.
    Karakousis, Giorgos C.
    Czerniecki, Brian J.
    Wu, Liza C.
    Kelz, Rachel R.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (13) : 2462 - 2468
  • [25] Dermal Autografts in Breast Reconstruction A Review of Past and Current Trends
    Davis, Claire
    Boyd, Carter
    Andino, David A. Mateo de Acosta
    Kumbla, Pallavi A.
    Sanchez, Ruston J.
    Kurapati, Srikanth
    King, Timothy W.
    de la Torre, Jorge, I
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (05) : 618 - 622
  • [26] Current Trends in Breast Reconstruction following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
    Hu, Vivian J.
    McCleary, Sean P.
    Smullin, Carolyn P.
    Morales, Ricardo Rosales
    Da Lio, Andrew L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (04) : E4277
  • [27] Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer patients in China
    Chen, Y.
    Chen, J.
    Chen, J.
    Yang, B.
    Li, L.
    Huang, X.
    Shao, Z.
    Shen, Z.
    Wu, J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [28] Actigraphy to Evaluate Changes in Physical Activity After Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Glassman, Gabriella E.
    Makhoul, Alan T.
    Zhang, Michael
    Johnson, Shepard P.
    Perdikis, Galen
    Drolet, Brian C.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (6S) : S610 - S614
  • [29] Dimensional changes in reconstructed nipples: autologous versus prosthetic breast reconstruction
    Yang, Chae Eun
    Park, Kwang Hyun
    Lew, Dae Hyun
    Roh, Tai Suk
    Lee, Dong Won
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 96 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [30] Autologous fat grafting in breast reconstruction: implications for follow-up and surveillance
    Hanson, Summer E.
    Kapur, Sahil K.
    Hwang, Rosa F.
    Dryden, Mark S.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (01) : 487 - 493