A New Function for Frequency Analysis in the Risk Assessment of Offshore Oil-Related Platforms

被引:0
|
作者
Kaneko, Fujio [1 ]
Yuzui, Tomohiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Maritime Res Inst, Marine Risk Assessment Dept, Tokyo, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF SHIP RESEARCH | 2023年 / 67卷 / 02期
关键词
platform; earthquake; oil spill; leak hole; risk assessment; POWER-LAW DISTRIBUTIONS;
D O I
10.5957/JOSR.04210009
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Risk assessment of offshore oil-related platforms such as the floating production storage and offloading system (FPSO) is extremely important. In earthquakes prone to target sea areas, earthquakes should be considered as one of the important external forces that cause severe damage. In such risk assessments, for estimating the appearance frequency of seismic energy, the complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) of seismic energy of a considered area is usually based on the Gutenberg-Richter law. Furthermore, it is important to estimate the CCDF of the leak hole diameter when estimating the damage caused by an oil spill accident in an offshore oil-related platform. Some ship classification societies recommend using a formula based on the power law distribution as used in those processes. However, the power law distribution has a drawback in that, i.e., it is essentially impossible to accurately estimate the CCDF over the entire domain of the random variables. The authors have developed an enhanced power law distribution function that eliminates such defects in the power law distribution function and some practical methods for estimating its parameters. In this study, the developed function is applied to the CCDFs of the seismic energy and leak hole diameter. The results demonstrate that the function fits the existing data with sufficient accuracy. Therefore, the new function introduced here can be well used in the frequency analysis of the risk assessment of offshore oil-related platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 119
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seabirds at risk around offshore oil platforms in the North-west Atlantic
    Wiese, FK
    Montevecchi, WA
    Davoren, GK
    Huettmann, F
    Diamond, AW
    Linke, J
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2001, 42 (12) : 1285 - 1290
  • [22] RISK ASSESSMENT OF OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES IN THE NETHERLANDS
    HENRIQUEZ, LR
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 1994, 29 (6-12) : 317 - 322
  • [23] OPERATIONAL SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT IN OFFSHORE OIL WELLS
    Jaculli, Marcelo A.
    Colombo, Danilo
    Mendes, Jose Ricardo P.
    Marculino, Cinara F. G.
    Costa, Beethoven G. dos S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2019, VOL 8, 2019,
  • [24] Fuzzy risk assessment of oil and gas offshore wells
    Lavasani, S. M. Miri
    Yang, Z.
    Finlay, J.
    Wang, J.
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2011, 89 (05) : 277 - 294
  • [25] SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS FOR OCEAN OIL PLATFORMS
    Chang Xiangdong
    ChinaOceanEngineering, 1989, (04) : 399 - 409
  • [26] Reliability assessment of offshore wind farms for floating oil and gas platforms cleaner production
    Almeida, Gustavo Q.
    Borges, Carmen L. T.
    Chicco, Gianfranco
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2025,
  • [27] A new risk assessment model for offshore engineering
    Li, Yan-Cang
    Suo, Juan-Juan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2006, : 4197 - +
  • [28] Collapse Analysis of Offshore Platforms Using Constrained New Waves
    Kimiaei, Mehrdad
    Edgarth, Daud W.
    33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2014, VOL 4B, 2014,
  • [29] Employee risk perception related to offshore oil platform movements
    Rundmo, T
    Sjoberg, L
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 1996, 24 (03) : 211 - 227
  • [30] Assessment of offshore platforms under subsidence - Part II: Analysis and results
    Jha, AK
    Kiciman, OK
    Gebara, JM
    Stahl, B
    Dahl-Stamnes, KH
    JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (04): : 267 - 273