Widening participation - recruitment methods in mental health randomised controlled trials: a qualitative study

被引:5
|
作者
Iflaifel, Mais [1 ]
Hall, Charlotte L. [2 ,3 ]
Green, Heidi R. [4 ,5 ]
Willis, Andrew [6 ]
Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan [7 ]
Juszczak, Edmund [1 ]
Townsend, Mark [8 ]
Martin, Jennifer [2 ,3 ]
Sprange, Kirsty [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Sch Med, NIHR MindTech MedTech Cooperat, Innovat Pk,Triumph Rd, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Innovat Pk,Triumph Rd, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Previously Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[5] COUCH Hlth, Manchester, England
[6] Univ Leicester, Ctr Ethn Hlth Res, Leicester Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, England
[7] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
[8] NIHR Evaluat Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr NE, Southampton, England
关键词
Mental health; Recruitment; Randomised controlled trials; Thematic analysis; Stigma; Digital divide; Diversity; Inclusivity; INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS; DATA SATURATION; FOCUS GROUPS; BARRIERS; INTERNET; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-02032-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBarriers to mental health research participation are well documented including distrust of services and research; and stigma surrounding mental health. They can contribute to a lack of diversity amongst participants in mental health research, which threatens the generalisability of knowledge. Given the recent widespread use of the internet in medical research, this study aimed to explore the perspectives of key partners on the use of online (e.g. social media) and offline (e.g. in-person) recruitment as an approach to improving diversity in mental health randomised controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsFace-to-face and online interviews/focus groups with researchers working in mental health and Patient and Public Involvement partners in the United Kingdom. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis.ResultsThree focus groups and three interviews were conducted with a total N = 23 participants. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) recruitment reach; (2) Demographic factors that affect selection of recruitment method; (3) safety of technology, and; (4) practical challenges. Five main factors were identified that affect the choice of recruitment method: age, complexity of mental health problem and stigma, cultural and ethnicity differences and digital divide. The use of online methods was considered more accessible to people who may feel stigmatised by their mental health condition and with a benefit of reaching a wider population. However, a common view amongst participants was that online methods require closer data monitoring for quality of responders, are not fully secure and less trustworthy compared to offline methods that enable participants to build relationships with health providers. Funding, staff time and experience, organisational support, and technical issues such as spam or phishing emails were highlighted as practical challenges facing online recruitment. All participants agreed that using a hybrid approach tailored to the population under study is paramount.ConclusionsThis study highlighted the importance of offering a flexible and multifaceted recruitment approach by integrating online with offline methods to support inclusivity and widening participation in mental health research. The findings will be used to develop considerations for researchers designing RCTs to improve recruitment in mental health research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Recruitment difficulties in randomised controlled trials
    Puffer, S
    Torgerson, DJ
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 24 : 214S - 215S
  • [12] Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
    Houghton, Catherine
    Dowling, Maura
    Meskell, Pauline
    Hunter, Andrew
    Gardner, Heidi
    Conway, Aislinn
    Treweek, Shaun
    Sutcli, Katy
    Noyes, Jane
    Devane, Declan
    Nicholas, Jane R.
    Biesty, Linda M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (10):
  • [13] Is mental health services research in need of randomised controlled trials?
    Kallert, TW
    PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, 2005, 32 (08) : 375 - 377
  • [14] Patient preference randomised controlled trials in mental health research
    Howard, L
    Thornicroft, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 188 : 303 - 304
  • [15] Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials
    Gray, S
    Price, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (03) : 323 - 324
  • [16] Recruitment methods for sarcopenia trials - lessons from the LACE randomised controlled trial
    Band, Margaret
    Hume, Cheryl
    Pilvynte, Kristina
    Aitchison, Marcus
    Smith, Karen
    Avenell, Alison
    Kemp, Paul
    Donnan, Peter
    Hapca, Adrian
    Struthers, Allan
    Sumukadas, Deepa
    George, Jacob
    Witham, Miles
    TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [17] Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study
    Lewin, Simon
    Glenton, Claire
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 732 - 734
  • [18] Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study
    Campbell, M. K.
    Snowdon, C.
    Francis, D.
    Elbourne, D.
    McDonald, A. M.
    Knight, R.
    Entwistle, V.
    Garcia, J.
    Roberts, I.
    Grant, A.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2007, 11 (48)
  • [19] Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials
    Treweek, Shaun
    Pitkethly, Marie
    Cook, Jonathan
    Kjeldstrom, Monica
    Taskila, Taina
    Johansen, Marit
    Sullivan, Frank
    Wilson, Sue
    Jackson, Catherine
    Jones, Ritu
    Mitchell, Elizabeth
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (04):
  • [20] Embedding qualitative research in randomised controlled trials to improve recruitment: findings from two recruitment optimisation studies of orthopaedic surgical trials
    Arabella Scantlebury
    Catriona McDaid
    Stephen Brealey
    Elizabeth Cook
    Hemant Sharma
    Arun Ranganathan
    Joy Adamson
    Trials, 22