Widening participation - recruitment methods in mental health randomised controlled trials: a qualitative study

被引:5
|
作者
Iflaifel, Mais [1 ]
Hall, Charlotte L. [2 ,3 ]
Green, Heidi R. [4 ,5 ]
Willis, Andrew [6 ]
Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan [7 ]
Juszczak, Edmund [1 ]
Townsend, Mark [8 ]
Martin, Jennifer [2 ,3 ]
Sprange, Kirsty [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Sch Med, NIHR MindTech MedTech Cooperat, Innovat Pk,Triumph Rd, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, NIHR Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Innovat Pk,Triumph Rd, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Previously Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[5] COUCH Hlth, Manchester, England
[6] Univ Leicester, Ctr Ethn Hlth Res, Leicester Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, England
[7] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
[8] NIHR Evaluat Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr NE, Southampton, England
关键词
Mental health; Recruitment; Randomised controlled trials; Thematic analysis; Stigma; Digital divide; Diversity; Inclusivity; INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS; DATA SATURATION; FOCUS GROUPS; BARRIERS; INTERNET; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-02032-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBarriers to mental health research participation are well documented including distrust of services and research; and stigma surrounding mental health. They can contribute to a lack of diversity amongst participants in mental health research, which threatens the generalisability of knowledge. Given the recent widespread use of the internet in medical research, this study aimed to explore the perspectives of key partners on the use of online (e.g. social media) and offline (e.g. in-person) recruitment as an approach to improving diversity in mental health randomised controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsFace-to-face and online interviews/focus groups with researchers working in mental health and Patient and Public Involvement partners in the United Kingdom. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis.ResultsThree focus groups and three interviews were conducted with a total N = 23 participants. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) recruitment reach; (2) Demographic factors that affect selection of recruitment method; (3) safety of technology, and; (4) practical challenges. Five main factors were identified that affect the choice of recruitment method: age, complexity of mental health problem and stigma, cultural and ethnicity differences and digital divide. The use of online methods was considered more accessible to people who may feel stigmatised by their mental health condition and with a benefit of reaching a wider population. However, a common view amongst participants was that online methods require closer data monitoring for quality of responders, are not fully secure and less trustworthy compared to offline methods that enable participants to build relationships with health providers. Funding, staff time and experience, organisational support, and technical issues such as spam or phishing emails were highlighted as practical challenges facing online recruitment. All participants agreed that using a hybrid approach tailored to the population under study is paramount.ConclusionsThis study highlighted the importance of offering a flexible and multifaceted recruitment approach by integrating online with offline methods to support inclusivity and widening participation in mental health research. The findings will be used to develop considerations for researchers designing RCTs to improve recruitment in mental health research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Widening participation – recruitment methods in mental health randomised controlled trials: a qualitative study
    Mais Iflaifel
    Charlotte L Hall
    Heidi R Green
    Andrew Willis
    Stefan Rennick-Egglestone
    Edmund Juszczak
    Mark Townsend
    Jennifer Martin
    Kirsty Sprange
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23
  • [2] Processes in recruitment to randomised controlled trials of medicines for children (RECRUIT): a qualitative study
    Shilling, V.
    Williamson, P. R.
    Hickey, H.
    Sowden, E.
    Smyth, R. L.
    Young, B.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 15 (15) : 1 - +
  • [4] Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches
    Elliott, Daisy
    Husbands, Samantha
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Holmberg, Lars
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 789 - 798
  • [5] Barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials: A qualitative perspective
    Team, Victoria
    Bugeja, Lyndal
    Weller, Carolina D.
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (06) : 929 - 942
  • [6] Mixing your methods: The use of qualitative methods in randomised controlled trials
    White, P.
    Keogh, K.
    Smith, S.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2008, 23 : 271 - 272
  • [7] Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: A review of randomised controlled trials
    Watson J.M.
    Torgerson D.J.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)
  • [8] Health care professional recruitment of patients and family carers to palliative care randomised controlled trials: A qualitative multiple case study
    Dunleavy, Lesley
    Preston, Nancy
    Walshe, Catherine
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 37 (10) : 1540 - 1553
  • [9] Using qualitative research methods to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials: the Quartet study
    de Salis, Isabel
    Tomlin, Zelda
    Toerien, Merran
    Donovan, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 : 92 - 96
  • [10] Recruitment in randomised controlled trials: a conundrum
    Rikken, J.
    Casteleijn, R.
    Van der Weide, M.
    Duijnhoven, R.
    Goddijn, M.
    Mol, B. W.
    Van der veen, F.
    Van Wely, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39