Design criteria for upstream raised tailings facilities

被引:1
|
作者
Wates, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] John Wates Consulting, POB 1634, ZA-2128 Rivonia, South Africa
关键词
tailings; upstreaming; risk; ALARP; deposition;
D O I
10.17159/2309-8775/2023/v65n2a2
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
For more than 100 years upstreaming has been the dominant raising method for tailings storage facilities in Southern Africa. However, there is a growing view worldwide that upstreaming is inherently less safe than centreline or downstream raising of tailings storage facilities. Considering that more than 90% of the 250 plus operational tailings storing facilities in Southern Africa are upstream raised and cannot economically be converted to, or replaced by, downstream raised facilities, the arguments for and against upstreaming were examined in this study. It was found that no compelling reason exists to ban upstreaming in Southern Africa, provided that failure mechanisms are thoroughly considered to prevent serious design omissions. The ALARP (as low as reasonably practicable) approach is introduced as a practical method to deal with the risk of failure, and its hierarchical application is illustrated.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 16
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design of logistic criteria to establish healthcare facilities in vulnerable regions in Mexico
    Perez-Balboa, Irene-Crisely
    Caballero-Morales, Santiago-Omar
    Sanchez-Partida, Diana
    Cano-Olivos, Patricia
    ACTA LOGISTICA, 2023, 10 (02): : 251 - 265
  • [32] Characterization of pore pressure conditions in upstream tailings dams
    Martin, TE
    TAILINGS AND MINE WASTE '99, 1999, : 303 - 313
  • [33] HUMAN ENERGY EXPENDITURES AS CRITERIA FOR THE DESIGN OF HOUSEHOLD-STORAGE FACILITIES
    MCCRACKEN, EC
    RICHARDSON, M
    JOURNAL OF HOME ECONOMICS, 1959, 51 (03): : 198 - 206
  • [34] Some considerations in the stability analysis of upstream tailings dams
    Martin, TE
    McRoberts, EC
    TAILINGS AND MINE WASTE '99, 1999, : 287 - 302
  • [35] GUIDE TO PRINCIPAL DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NUCLEAR FUEL REPROCESSING FACILITIES.
    Anon
    American National Standards Institute, Standards, 1973, (N101, 3):
  • [36] Design, construction and management of tailings storage facilities for surface disposal in China: case studies of failures
    Wei, Zuoan
    Yin, Guangzhi
    Wang, J. G.
    Wan, Ling
    Li, Guangzhi
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2013, 31 (01) : 106 - 112
  • [37] CRITERIA FOR STUDIO FACILITIES
    HANSEN, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE AUDIO ENGINEERING SOCIETY, 1975, 23 (10): : 840 - 840
  • [38] Options for Management and Closure of Tailings Storage Facilities
    Pritchard, Jodie
    Jensen, Trina
    Welsh, David
    E&MJ-ENGINEERING AND MINING JOURNAL, 2010, 211 (02): : 72 - +
  • [39] Case for auditing and certification of tailings management facilities
    Cale, Stewart
    Cambridge, Mike
    Industry and Environment, 2000, 23 (SPEC. ISS.): : 71 - 73
  • [40] A risk assessment tool for tailings storage facilities
    Chovan, Karen M.
    Julien, Michel R.
    Ingabire, Edouardine-Pascale
    James, Michael
    Masengo, Edouard
    Lepine, Thomas
    Lavoie, Pascal
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 58 (12) : 1898 - 1914